Revealed: 8,000+ applied for LSAT (cum Jindal GLS) admissions, up from 350 in 2009 • Coaching centre ads were key to growth

LSAT applicants growth year-by-year
LSAT applicants growth year-by-year

The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) India - used as an admission test for 52 Indian law schools but primarily having acted as a feeder for JGLS Sonepat - has seen 8,268 applicants this year, according to an internal email sent by JGLS VC Prof Raj Kumar (full email published below).

Since its inception, LSAT (and JGLS) have zealously guarded the number of LSAT test takers, despite several requests from us for disclosure, but according to Kumar’s email, circulated within the school, a copy of which was leaked to us:

I am most delighted to inform you that the Jindal Global Law School applications process for its UG programmes is completed. With a profound sense of happiness and satisfaction, I wish to report to you that we have 8268 paid LSAT registrations for admissions to the JGLS in 2019. This has resulted in an impressive and unprecedented 20.5% increase since the last year.

After receiving a copy of the email, we reached out to Kumar for comment, and he confirmed that only 350 had taken the LSAT in 2009.

The new, larger, number is, of course, still way shy of the 60,000-odd who sat the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) this year (or even the 20,000 who appeared for the competing NLU Delhi All India Entrance Test (AILET)).

But all told, it’s not a bad effort for a test that has had to prove itself against its competitors and currently charges Rs 3,800 per pop, with a big pool of applicants being important for a law school wishing to attract strong candidates (even if LSAT India toppers who also perform well in the CLAT or AILET are nowhere near guaranteed to join JGLS).

Kumar said that while lots of other Indian law schools accepted LSAT results (52 according to LSAT’s website), JGLS was “100%… the only law school in that list which takes LSAT as exclusive exam” (at least for the 600 seats of its 5-year course; for the 3-year LLB course and 1-year LLM, JGLS also accepts Delhi University LLB/LLM entrance test and CLAT-PG scores, he said).

In 2011, we had reported that the LSAT was accepted by 25 colleges, up from only four in 2010.

Marketing an exam

The growth is in part a testament to solid marketing, not just from LSAT but also JGLS.

Disclosure: Both JGLS and LSAT have been occasional advertisers with Legally India over the past years.

As Kumar pointed out in his email, JGLS had been “strategically tying up with all the noticeable players in the state of Bihar, Career Launcher, CLAT Path, and CLAT Possible and interacting with all the students inside the coaching institutes covering over 700 students in the span of 3 days”.

“This was a very significant strategic initiative,” he wrote about the programme headed up by admissions head Prof Anand Prakash Mishra.

We asked Kumar what exactly this entailed, and he explained: “They [the coaching centres] let us in, and we pay for advertisements, we put our information in their printed materials. They have their booklets and printed materials, you pay for advertisement and outreach.”

LSAT itself (administered by Pearson Vue in India, under licence from the US’ venerable Law School Admission Council (LSAC)) would have also run advertisement campaigns with coaching centres, Kumar said.

Similar strategies were used in other states, according to the email:

  • in UP: campaigns with “market leader” CLAT Possible;
  • in Tamil Nadu: “three market leaders in the coaching industry” Sriram Law Academy, Co-draft Academy of Law and Career Launcher, as well as Kumar addressing the Loyola College Convocation in Chennai of 12,000 students and parents);
  • in Rajasthan: a tie-up with the CLAT prep coaching centre,
  • in Madhya Pradesh: a tie-up with LegalEdge, Career Launcher and School of Skills Vidhigya in Indore, to conduct an open house and classroom sessions.

Regional breakdowns

LSAT India admissions break-down by region
LSAT India admissions break-down by region

Kumar’s email also highlighted that while the Chennai test centre was the fastest growing (40% year-on-year).

Nevertheless, North Indian states still made up around 50% of LSAT takers, with the largest number of LSAT takers from:

  • Uttar Pradesh (15.1% of total applicants, with 30% year-on-year growth)
  • Delhi (13.7%)
  • Haryana (9.6%)

Maharashtra was next up at 8.5%, followed by Rajasthan and (now) Tamil Nadu.

JGLS full email celebrating LSAT growth and stats

Comments

Guest 29 May 2019, 17:13
+20 -0
I wish JGLS well because they throw the red carpet to NLU alumni wishing to join as faculty, whereas NLUs treat their own alumni faculty like crap.
Guest 29 May 2019, 17:15
+12 -2
Jindal is doing well as placements are improving.
Guest 29 May 2019, 17:57
+15 -2
These coaching centre people are responsible for over hyping NLUD and MNLU.
Observer 30 May 2019, 07:31
+5 -4
Guest see by yourself by visiting nlud, u will find teaching methods and teachers better than other nlu. Quality of students is equally good as nls and nalsar. Don't spread rumors
Guest 30 May 2019, 07:43
+5 -2
If teaching methods and teachers are 'better' at NLUD than other NLUs, how are their graduates only 'as good as' those of NLSIU, NALSAR, NUJS etc.? They should be far better, no? Otherwise what's the use of having better teachers, if they cannot produce better graduates?
Observer 30 May 2019, 16:54
+3 -2
No coaching centres r over hyping perticular University but giving a realistic view. If u consider nlud is overhyped, why don't u add nalsar and nls in this list. Lots of comparison already done in this forum abt adhoc faculties in top law university and choice of clat and ailet takers and no need to go in this any further.
Guest 31 May 2019, 02:21
+7 -0
How would coaching centres know what's a realistic view regarding law schools? Do you see these people hanging around campuses or moot court halls or during day zero or LLM scholarships?
Observer 31 May 2019, 08:19
+3 -1
Very correct, with the same anology, it is difficult for anyone to know, coaching centre r overhying a perticular nlu. The broad perception of coaching centres is based on their students and data collected from various sources. No method is full proof. Yes mnlu is perceived to perform better in future
Guest 31 May 2019, 09:56
+3 -0
Most coaching centres don't do any sort of the research that you seem to hint at. Not sure what gave you the impression that they do. And over-hyping includes predicting that a place would do very well even before the first batch graduates from there. Like you are doing with MNLU. The place is yet to get proper good faculty, campus and VC. If location was the only factor required for success, then the hundreds of private law colleges in and around Mumbai would have all been performing excellently.
Guest 29 May 2019, 21:13
+9 -0
Interesting. Almost all university ranks in India are now becoming products of coaching classes.

Makes one wonder if one takes away the students, would ranking of various colleges/universities be maintained, thus showing whether the success of a student is because of his/her intrinsic discipline, work ethos and comprehensive power, or is the university actually training students.
Informer 30 May 2019, 11:34
+9 -3
The ranking given by coaching centres this year is broadly this:

Tier 1
1. NLSIU
2. NLUD (as a result of NIRF, though some still place NALSAR at 2)
3. NALSAR
4. NUJS

Tier 2
5. NLUJ
6. NLIU
7. GNLU
8. MNLU Mumbai (over-ranked IMO)

Tier 3
9. JGLS (if affordable)
10. RGNUL
11 RMLNLU
12. MNLU Nagpur (possibly over-ranked)
13. MNLU Aurangabad (possibly over-ranked)
14. NLUO (possibly under-ranked)

Tier 4
13. HNLU(possibly under-ranked)
14. CNLU

Tier 5
15. All other NLUs all placed at par.
Delhi lawyer 30 May 2019, 14:13
+13 -0
Most of coaching guys are not lawyers but businessmen. They misguide most of students. Create false notions about NLUs and students particularly from small towns follow them blindly. So students go to Vizag or Trichy or Assam or Ranchi leaving good options of undergraduate education at say Delhi university.
Guest 30 May 2019, 16:03
+8 -0
Very true. Met several aspirants this year frantically trying to change their preference order because the LST Centre they had studied at advised them to put NLUO at 2!
Law mentor 30 May 2019, 15:40
+23 -3
Tier 1

NLSIU/NALSAR/NLUD/NUJS/JGLS (if fee not an issue)/NLUJ/NLIU/GNLU

Tier 2

HNLU/RMLNLU/RGNUL/NUALS/ MNLU Mumbai/ SLS Pune/ GLC Mumbai/ ILS Pune/ NLUO/CNLU/Nirma/Christ/ USLLS GGSIU

Tier 3

NUSRL Ranchi/NLU Asam/ DSNLU Vizag/ HPNLU Shimla/ MNLU Nagpur/ MNLU Aurangabad /BHU / AMU/ Allahabad/ Lucknow/ VIPS /UILS PU Chandigarh/SOEL Chennai / Bennett Greater Noida/ UPES /ULC Bangalore /Calcutta University /New Law College Pune

Tier 4

Kurukshetra /MDU / Amity/ VIT Chennai/ ICFAI/ Osmania/ MS Ramaiah/ Lloyd / SRM/Sharda /Galgotia /Lovely etc. etc.

Can anybody make it better??
Dementor 31 May 2019, 02:19
+6 -18
Yes, you. By keeping quiet.
Law mentor 2 Jun 2019, 14:32
+6 -2
You should have rather kept quiet if not interested in it.
yes 31 May 2019, 12:34
+3 -0
I usually get very combative about such subjective rankings, but I have to say this is more or less spot-on. I'd say SOEL and UPES are Tier 3 while Bennett is definitely Tier 4. Lloyd and Sharda should not figure in any rankings. I have my reservations about Kurukshetra too because lately they're just an LLM distributorship.
Guest 31 May 2019, 13:38
+2 -1
Your agreement is based on subjective consideration too. Without revealing methodology, veracity of data and other factors, any ranking is not worth the space it takes to get published.
Law mentor 2 Jun 2019, 14:38
+5 -2
My experience is my criteria. All law schools have students trained by me.
Law mentor 2 Jun 2019, 14:37
+1 -2
Thanks for your inputs. I treat Bennett in tier 3 despite being 2 batches old because having a dean like Vivekanandan and strong faculty appointments unlike other private law school. There is a promise in Bennett law school. Kurukshetra 5 year law college is okay. LLM certainly not of much worth. Llyod, Sharda, Galgotia, Lovely, SRM, Geeta Law College, Mewar Law college etc. can form a separate tier 5.
Guest 31 May 2019, 15:01
+2 -1
Totally wrong ranking. NLUJ, NLIU and GNLU cannot be tier 1. Also, Symbi, GLC etc are much inferior to tier 2/tier 3 NLUs.
Law mentor 2 Jun 2019, 14:41
+2 -2
I disagree. GNLU, NLIU or NLUJ may not be as good as NLS or NALSAR but they are certainly in same league. Their students securing similar jobs, winning same moots, doing equally well. They should not be put in Tier 2.
NALSAR? 31 May 2019, 15:07
+2 -1
Kian, U need to cover this. The issue has been going on for a while now!


https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/nalsar-uni-hyd-summoned-national-bc-commission-over-non-implementation-quota-102724

http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/2019/may/31/nalsar-university-vice-chancellor-asked-to-appear-before-ncbc-on-june-4-1984119.html

https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/ncbc-issues-notice-to-nalsar-for-not-implementing-obc-bc-quota-in-admission-119053001033_1.html

https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/national/542589-nalsar-served-ncbc-notice-for-non-implementation-of-reservation-rules

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/310519/nalsar-university-served-notice-on-backward-classes-quota.html
guest5 2 Jun 2019, 18:22
+2 -0
How is Symbiosis Hyderabad and also Amity Mumbai?
Law mentor 3 Jun 2019, 13:31
+1 -0
Both mediocre. SLS Hyderabad could be a bit better.
Guest 3 Jun 2019, 14:16
+1 -0
It has got a decent director now, who would try to improve upon infra, faculty hire etc. over the next few years.