Students petition BCI for help in fight against law school administration after NLIU students’ suspension

Over 500 law students in India have signed an online petition to the Bar Council of India (BCI) to establish an All India Law Students Grievance Redressal Authority (LASGRA) to address student concerns such as a lack of campus amenities and representation in decision making.

Nine NLIU fourth year students were suspended two weeks ago on Sunday, according to an anonymous student’s write-up on Lawctopus, who alleged an administrative vendetta against students’ protest against the law school’s policies.

This and other grievances at other colleges between students and the administration, inspired an online petition supported by Lawctopus and the All India Law Students Association (AILSA), which states:

“Law students in India have wide-ranging serious complaints against the law schools/colleges they are studying in.

“The complaints range from issues like bad mess food and low internet connectivity to allegations that the top-most law school administrators are indulging in mal-practices and infringing the fundamental rights of the students.”

Legally India was not able to reach NLIU’s administration for comment but according to the student report, the authorities said that students were suspended because faculty had complained of misbehaviour and harassment that led to the faculty member’s resignation.

The students had protested on 9 October against the NLIU administration’s blanket ban on bringing private vehicles into campus while the college failed to provide students with alternative transportation. The ban had followed the September deaths of two students in an accident of their private vehicle.

The 9 October protest also targeted the lack of basic campus amenities such as a grocery store or a pharmacy for emergencies, an ill-equipped campus ambulance and insufficient doctor visits, expensive or unavailable food items in the canteen, having to deal with autorickshaw cartels for transportation to and from campus, and restrictive library timings.

The Lawctopus report stated that the student protest was stonewalled by the faculty member who came to negotiate, and NLIU director SS Singh was missing from the negotiations entirely.

In the petition the students have asked for two-pronged grievance redressal mechanism from the BCI: a law school grievance redressal cell (GRC) for complaining to faculty and the vice chancellor, and an All India Law Students Grievance Redressal Authority, which should be regulated by a BCI official for when the GRC “fails to perform”.

In July, NUJS Kolkata faculty and students submitted letters to the college administration running to dozens of pages of grievances, including declining faculty standards and opaque, apparently arbitrary decision-making from the top.

In May, the GNLU Gandhinagar review commission raised the law school’s faculty and administrative staff deficit, the policy of extracting heavy fines from students, lack of effective grievance redressal mechanisms for faculty and students, and examination rules, in a report.

In January, NLSIU Bangalore students negotiated with its administration for extension of unilaterally imposed impractical curfew timings on campus.

In August 2012, RMLNLU Lucknow students cried foul about poor campus placement efforts, lackadaisical administration, a lack of professionalism of the university’s assistant registrar, degradation in faculty quality, and no redressal of student grievances.

Petition at Change.org

Comments

Alice 18 Oct 2013, 12:08
+1 -0
In words of Queen of Hearts... "Off with their head" !
Guest 18 Oct 2013, 14:06
+0 -0
Why papers are missing in NUJS ?
rapper 19 Oct 2013, 03:23
+3 -2
Can we petition LI to give greater coverage to all the NLU scams instead of just doing 1 report every 2 months? I feel LI is brushing these reports under the carpet. These are issues of serious national importance yet all we see on LI are reports of B-grade law firms doing C-grade deals. Perhaps LI is afraid that their website will be blocked in NLUs or upset the establishment?
Go Lawctopus! 19 Oct 2013, 05:31
+4 -1
Lawctopus is the shit
Maybe not? 19 Oct 2013, 09:12
+3 -6
I've received the petition being circulated and have chosen not to sign it. This is because, after having interacted with students in law schools and colleges across the country (both NLUs as well as non NLUs), I strongly feel that the Indian law student community lack the maturity to make use of such an appellate mechanism. It shall lead to a flood of frivolous complaints and allegations which, in turn, would lead to the dismantling of this mechanism if it does see the light of day.

While the issue at hand (i.e. discrimination against women students) is grave and does merit serious consideration, I am sure that once the floodgates are open, the frivolity of the complaints that shall pour in will lead to a greater trust deficit between the administrators and the administered.
RGNUL Se peedit 19 Oct 2013, 16:03
+1 -0
1) blocked social networking websites such as Facebook because one student tried to expose the bad food via a video

2) awful mess food. Lizards insects etc have all been found in it

3) 12,50,000 moot court fees from all 450 students and yet not a single rupee is used on the Intra moot and the teachers are aske to judge resulting in an unfair intra

4) Bad administration, lazy staff except for the library staff which is excellent I believe

5) faculty apparently is so talented that an IPR teacher teaches IPC, IPC teacher teaches interpretation of statutes and contract law, family law teachers tech international law and ADRS teacher teaches company law. We are have such a highly god gifted faculty.FML

6) Library timings till 4 30 only. FMLA

7) Forget students, teachers play politics in between themselves

8) so much stupid bureaucratic nonsense that a bloody file takes 10 months to pass only if you pursue them to the point of absolute necessity
ganja 19 Oct 2013, 18:19
+2 -2
In terms of exposing law school scams, the worst site is Bar & Bench. They have no guts. I would say the hierarchy is:

1. LI
2. Livelaw
3. Lawctopus
4. Bar & Bench
comparison 19 Oct 2013, 20:23
+2 -2
[b]Legallyindia[/b]
Global rank: 98,365
India rank: 11,324

[b]Lawctopus[/b]
Global rank: 2,96,149
India rank: 26,774

[b]Bar and Bench[/b]
Global rank: 3,25,091
India rank: 38,652

It is heartening to note how a student lead entrepreneurial initiative (Lawctopus) has gone ahead of 'staffed' and 'officed' Bar and Bench.

And of course, Legally India remains the leader of the pack.