Students boycott paying hiked fees; NUJS extends deadline

NUJS_Kolkata_th
NUJS_Kolkata_th
NUJS Kolkata has extended the tuition fees payment deadline after students refuse to pay in protest against the fee-hike, which was announced only several weeks before the start of this term.

The National University of Juridicial Sciences Kolkata’s (NUJS) tuition fees, which were doubled by the university in some cases, were originally due on 17 July 2009.

However, the deadline was extended to 10 August for students studying without a loan and to 31 August for those studying on a loan.

Outgoing NUJS student body president Ashish Arun said: “The administration has extended the last date to deposit the fees by a month and still most of us have not paid up.”

NUJS’ Student Juridical Association (SJA) had made a presentation to NUJS’ finance committee, which decided to extend the fee payment deadline and to put the matter before the university’s executive committee.

That committee is due to meet on 29 August and is set to take a final decision on the fee-hike then.

“Let’s see what happens,” said Arun.

A senior staff member of the University, who preferred not to be named, confirmed that the deadline had been postponed. However, he declined to comment until the outcome of the executive committee meeting.

A concern from the University is understood to be that even after the increase in fees, the college’s expenses are set to exceed its income.

The students will argue that the fees should not be increased immediately but should instead be increased gradually.

Legally India reported last month that a student had won an appeal in the Andra Pradesh High Court to allow her to transfer to National Law University Jodhpur, after the fee hike was announced a short time before term and after students had already accepted their place at NUJS.

The five-year course costs for first-year students were increased by 100 per cent, with second to fifth year students seeing a rise in costs of almost 50 per cent.

Comments

Tanuj 25 Aug 2009, 09:21
+0 -0
"Legally India reported last month that a student had won an appeal in the Andra Pradesh High Court to allow her to transfer to National Law University Jodhpur, after the fee hike was announced a short time before term and after students had already accepted their place at NUJS".

The case was a bit more complex than this.

The student had applied to NUJS through the NRI category hoping to make it to NUJS even if her marks were less (NRI's cut off are slightly less than for the general category).

NUJS then had this huge fee hike. The student could no longer pay the amount.

Now comes the tricky part.

CLAT authorities say in their forms that preference for colleges mentioned by the applicants will not be changed. The student now had no option but to join NUJS and pay the fee which she could not pay. She could not go to NALSAR (the second preference) because her rank did not allow her to do so and neither could she move to NLU Jodhpur because of CLAT authority's above mentioned stipulation (no change in preferences).
John 25 Aug 2009, 10:13
+0 -0
Is the delay in paying fees the only visible sign of protest? Any other student activity that will help us make the delay-boycott connection>
hansa 25 Aug 2009, 19:57
+0 -0
NUJS students should not give up their laudable efforts. Its just not fair to them. Parents pay a lot of attention to the colleges their wards will go to, and college fees plays a huge role in this. Many parents wouldn't have enrolled their kids into NUJS, had the fees been this high before. A lot of planning by way of education loans etc goes into a child's college education. Therefore all of a sudden increasing it that too by 50% can weigh heavy on their pockets...the administration should be sensitive to such concerns.
John 26 Aug 2009, 10:19
+0 -0
Also need to reflect on how ethical it is to change the fee once admission process has been completed.
xyz 26 Aug 2009, 12:49
+0 -0
When a student joins any university, he/she would look at what would be the overall expenditure and depending on that would choose the best option available. under those circumstances, it is unjust on the part of the university to hike the fees by such drastic amount. if any hike is to be made it wold be applicable only to the new batch that wishes to enroll in the university as they would still have the option to not enroll. but once a student has enrolled in the university to increase the fees would leave the student with not much option but to pay/ else protest and hope for the best.

The fee hike seems absolutely unjustified considering the limited options that remain
Ashish Arun 26 Aug 2009, 18:48
+0 -0
After the 6th Pay Commission, the salaries have sky rocketed and we have recently recruited three really good Professors. However, the burden for the increased expenditure has unfortunately been passed on the students because there is no other source of funding for the University.

The situation is pathetic here because almost all other law schools get hefty grants from their state government. As far the WB is concerned, the less you talk about the government, the better it is.

Hopefully, the Executive Committee would understand that everyone cannot pay such high fees and will roll back the hike, atleast to some extent.

Please keep the comments flowing in.