Students: NLS admin, new VC process at zero bandwidth; cheap campus broadband blocked YouTube, Netflix

NLS student reverting to watching movies via DVD, yesterday
NLS student reverting to watching movies via DVD, yesterday

In a bid to fix NLSIU Bangalore’s ageing network infrastructure, which had broken down for around two weeks in part of the campus, the administration - still under interim stewardship pending the appointment of Prof Sudhir Krishnaswamy as vice chancellor (VC) - had ‘upgraded’ its internet connections to a new provider.

But as the new internet connection went live early yesterday, students found that video and music streaming services such as Google’s YouTube, Netflix, Amazon Prime and Spotify had also been blocked.

According to campus sources, the administration claimed that this was a security measure, but it’s more likely that they wanted to make sure that data limits on the new but considerably cheaper internet connection they had bought would not be breached.

We have been informed by several sources that the university had opted for a standard consumer-grade broadband connection that has a 10TB (10,000GB) monthly data cap for the entire campus, which would work out to around 20GB per month for each of the more than 500 students on campus, excluding teachers.

Streaming video can take up anything between 700MB to 3GB per hour, depending on the quality, meaning that if each student watched seven hours of high definition (HD) video or 30 hours of standard definition (SD) video per month, the entire school’s quota would run out.

But even without students binge-watching the latest season of Stranger Things or Sacred Games (which, we’re given to understand, is not uncommon amongst today’s youngsters), such bandwidth could also get eaten up with watching lectures or other learning resources on YouTube or other services, on top of plain academic and personal internet use.

Students were understandably far from pleased: you may take far too long to appoint a new VC, but you will never take our internet, the administration should have predicted as a reaction.

We understand that the students complained and the administration later yesterday made the streaming sites accessible again, but not before memes circulated amongst the student body lambasting the administration.

All this happened against the backdrop of a recent controversial Rs 50,000 fee hike we had first reported in June, which for the first time also included students’ being levied internet fees of Rs 12,500 per year.

Even buying a mobile phone internet simcard for every student would have given each student more data for far less money, one student told us.

Major malaise

But the rapid return of Fleabag and Mr Robot (pictured) doesn’t mean that everything is hunky dory now: students are concerned that the administration has been in stasis for the last month-and-a-half, since the effective takeover of NLSIU affairs by acting VC Prof MK Ramesh and registrar Prof Nandimath OV, who are allegedly not accessible to students.

The roll-out of the new internet connection without consulting students, was a case in point.

We have reached out to both for comment via email and phone, with queries regarding the internet and the below.

The more serious complaints include several policy changes instituted by the administration, which have hit the students hard:

  • student associations now have to pay the university from Rs 20,000 to Rs 30,000 just to use university halls to hold events for students, which used to be made available for free, stretching the already “shoestring” budgets of such bodies, according to one student;
  • gift hampers to visiting dignitaries used to be provided by the VC’s office for free; now student bodies are forced to buy such hampers out of their own limited budgets;
  • other costs that used to be covered by the college, such as a college photographer or fees to dignitaries, have also been absorbed by student body budgets in the last month-and-a-half;
  • the VC and registrar are allegedly very unresponsive to emails and are rarely available to speak to students in their offices.

On top of all that, the appointment of Krishnaswamy as VC - cleared by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and selection committee chaired by Supreme Court Justice SA Bobde - appears to have hit unspecified roadblocks within the admin blocks of Nagarbhavi.

No one seems to quite know when his appointment will take effect, if ever.

Comments

Wow. 28 Aug 2019, 11:49
+25 -2
Missing Venkata Rao already? Hahahaha. This was bound to happen. So much for SidC and his gang of faculty-rent-seekers saying "faculty are the bedrock of NLS". Never has been, never will be. They are there to enable and encourage. You need decisive leadership, and those who are not insecure about their own place in the world. For all the things Venkata Rao let slide, he knew how to run an institution. Those that leveraged the opportunity (say with more relaxation about not attending a useless class, and did something better instead like do a Jessup prep round) knowing that RVR's open door policy would always be there for them - would have been utterly stifled. Sure, some people managed to pass easily due to special repeats and such, but there was no dearth of achievement in the middle-or-top rungs. Academic standards were upheld by those who wanted it, and thought beyond the petty confines of small-minded faculty. Student achievements were no worse - any plateau (eg Rhodes scholarships) is only due to the emerging competition from other good law schools. That should be welcomed, rather than trying to paint it as RVR driving anything down.

I mean seriously? Paying the university for renting halls for student conferences? Does the admin not parrot these conferences at Convocation every year? Let the likes of some of these outdated incompetent teachers try to organise one on their own and see the quality of what's on offer. We see how those glorified research centres do on this front.

RVR had the foresight to see the incompetence that was there (and not just at Law School, every NLU has this). But he was also smart enough to give the student body the space to pursue their own excellence. Consilience, Symposium, Trilegal Arbitration Moot, NLS Debate (each at the forefront of any comparable event in India) - these things don't happen if the faculty run them. RVR knew this, and when any committee went to him for anything (mundane infrastructure to giving away awards), he always made it a point to grant any reasonable request.
Recent Alum 28 Aug 2019, 14:33
+8 -4
How is SidC being linked to these petty decisions by the interim administration at NLS? If anything else, his conduct over the past decade exhibits a pattern of everything that is the opposite of 'rent-seeking behaviour', both literally and metaphorically. At NALSAR, he has frequently spent money from his own pocket and given a considerable amount of time to support student-organised lectures and conferences. You also forget that he was one of the driving forces behind the expansion of the NLS Debate in the mid-2000s. He and others did it several years before RVR took over. The origins of well-organised events such as Spiritus, Strawberry Fields, Consilience, the NLS Investment Arbitration Moot and Admit One (Theatre Fest) also pre-date RVRs tenure as well. Some more events have been added over the years. That is good going on part of successive batches of students. The larger point is that the NLUs need competent and motivated faculty members, who can both teach well and publish in credible journals. Student activities will grow on their own strength, and yes, institutional support is of course needed. You are mixing up distinct issues, in a misplaced attempt to defend a populist VC.
Guest 28 Aug 2019, 15:23
+3 -0
Universities need good teachers, that's true. But everyone seems to be asking the teachers to do everything at once. Teaching beyond a certain workload and good, credible research cannot be done at the same time. Most Indian universities don't understand that. The few that do free up teachers having research skills from teaching workload mostly. The people who can do both would need to put in many more hours of work than academics usually do and hence won't be interested to do it at the salary levels Indian universities offer. Hence they'd mostly try to leave for better opportunities abroad. There's almost no objective way of judging teaching abilities by people outside the university, hence I find teachers are being only judged by their publications. That's not always fair. I've had terrific teachers in my law school who used to spend so much time with students that they never got around to publish much and faced career setbacks or disrespect later on for that. I'm not saying even 10-20% teachers are actually even capable of doing good research, but those who can, if they just focus on that to establish their credentials, then the students are the ones who'd lose out, since it would compromise their teaching. At NLUD and Jindal, most teachers who do good research regularly teach very less from what I know. So students get deprived of their expertise in the process.
Wow. 28 Aug 2019, 18:32
+8 -0
Obviously it was a spit-hot-take. To be fair to SidC, he's been at the forefront of the "Sudhir for VC" campaign. Point is, he has defended these faculty members in the past, to attack Venkata Rao. Also true that pre-Venkata Rao events did happen. But no one can deny the ease with which event organisation, infrastructure support and student empowerment has grown by leaps and bounds under Venkata Rao. Current students who were protesting for reform a few months ago now have a completely new beast on their hands. With Venkata Rao, he had his politics and self-interest. But he placated students concerns - mostly good, sometimes bad. But he was still the best of the lot, when compared to the other "old faculty that built law school". Some of them have such a terrible sense of entitlement and little achievement. The current interim admin represents the worst of it. One faculty member is going around law school proudly saying how she no longer has to worry about Venkata Rao overruling her decisions (however unreasonable and incompetent she herself is). This is what Venkata Rao offered respite from, and now that he's gone, every other neckbeard seems to be coming out of the woodwork to mark territory.

The larger point is that NLS needs competent, yet open-minded administrators. Faculty competence is a bonus, but if one had to pick either, the former is a safer bet. Because students can thrive despite faculty shortcomings, but a vindictive or narrow minded administration would be antithetical to student pursuits, interests and excellence.
Recent Alum 28 Aug 2019, 19:18
+1 -2
Wrong Again. An academic institution can only prosper if it has competent teachers who care about the long-term interests of their students. The present interim arrangement at NLS is anomalous, where some characters are unpacking years of pent up frustration, unfortunately on the hapless students. I do not recall SidC defending the senior faculty members at large. And yes, I read his long exchanges with another alum on this forum. He has an older connection with Dr. V.S. Elizabeth since he was her Teaching Assistant in his 5th year, around 2007. I recall this since we were in our first year at the time. He might be grateful to her for her teaching in the past, but he will definitely not put up with the vengeful decisions being made this month. And please remember, he has been at another institution since 2013. So your choice of words (however instinctive it might be) has the effect of wrongly and unfairly conflating him with the petty decisions being reported here. That borders on defamation.
Wow. 29 Aug 2019, 01:53
+2 -0
SidC [...] Some of his criticism is fair, I don't deny it. [...] I am not saying Venkata Rao was perfect. He certainly had his flaws, and most certainly put his own interest in self-perpetuation above all else. My limited point has been that he seems to have taken care to not tank the student interest while doing so. Granted, at its worst, it meant chances of failing a year were lowered. But on average, his open-door policy mitigated a lot of the harms of this "pent-up frustration" of these characters. Since he was always directly accessible, administrative matters were no hassle. Want a classroom opened up? "yes permitted". Want the A&O Hall? "yes permitted". It is a mentality that makes an administrator (even one as politically savvy as him) have the shrewdness and lack of insecurity to trust his students. For every 1 person misusing this, far more made the institution a better place. That is something the likes of these entrenched faculty (those that can't do much for themselves) can't seem to appreciate. Right now, getting a meeting with the acting VC (on any matter, student welfare, personal trouble, extra-curricular interest etc) is an exercise in futility. Maybe that's how most NLU-VCs are, but that's not how law school should be.

Finally, SidC cannot hide behind this "I'm at NALSAR since 2013" line of argument. He has certainly kept himself at the forefront of administrative issues and critique at NLS since then (which is a good thing, more power to him). More alumni should express and engage with these issues. I'm just saying that for the good SidC does, he also wildly misses the boat on others - like when his own bad experience with Venkata Rao colours his every instinct. Maybe now he'll see how much better off Venkata Rao was for law school than putting the likes of [...] in charge.
Guest 28 Aug 2019, 14:14
+7 -0
Students have to pay money to host events at the university auditorium and halls? Did I read that correctly? If true, that's new depths plumbed, really! Budget cuts I can understand, especially given that the student strength is kept low and hence less fees generated, but this is ridiculous!
Let the games begin 28 Aug 2019, 14:42
+6 -0
Apparently the University is asking the Sports Committee to cough up the dough to book rooms in the training centre / learning centre to host the visiting teams for Spiritus. Downright pathetic.
Guest 28 Aug 2019, 15:46
+5 -0
I can confirm that it is indeed true that the administration is deducting money from the SBA budget as cost for letting students use TC rooms, A&O hall, etc.
Allen and Overy hall costs around 15k, Training Centre ground floor hall costs around 10k, Rooms at the training Centre cost around 2k a night. If a committee wants to be exempted from paying the fee, they have to get special approval for the same from their faculty advisor, which the faculty members are reluctant to give. Even when a faculty approved the student request for waiver from paying such fees, the administration rejected the approval on technical grounds (coz the faculty member concerned is not part of the faculty faction currently in power).
Oh 28 Aug 2019, 17:12
+11 -11
Seriously? This becomes a news?

Legally India has become a gossip portal.
Move on 28 Aug 2019, 17:40
+6 -4
@Kian, if only there was such an in depth coverage of other law schools, there'd be a much better state of affairs in those schools, due to awareness of their admin's regimes. This would cause pressure on them through the student community, which we've seen in the recent past are able to get stuff done only when their protests catch attention.

Move beyond the NLS intricacies man.
Why not? 28 Aug 2019, 18:34
+3 -1
I think it's great that Kian covers NLS. Ideally, he should cover other law schools as well to this depth. It keeps admin somewhat accountable, student body leaders more accountable and improves overall transparency across NLUs.
Move On 28 Aug 2019, 20:43
+2 -0
I think what's not great is that he (intentionally OR unintentionally) JUST covers NLS.
Agree with the rest of your statement.
kianganz 29 Aug 2019, 05:11
+8 -3
You guys! :) some thoughts:

1. Generally, yes, we'll probably always cover NLS a little bit more than newer colleges because there's only one NLS: it's the oldest, ranked as one of the best by most rankings, has the most alumni working in law firms and what happens at NLS (or not) matters for the greater ecosystem.

2. Right now, NLS has the most interesting narrative: A changeover in VC, potentially first NLU grad VC at own NLU, and an interim administration that seems to have derailed the appointments and internal processes. Who doesn't want to know what will happen next in that saga?

3. Sometimes other NLUs have more interesting things going on. I.e. Just in the last year or two, there have been similarly interesting and developing stories at NUJS or Rgnul that we've covered extensively, because they illustrate and are relevant to the wider education ecosystem.

We can't cover everything, but there's usually a reason that we cover the colleges we do.
Chacha 28 Aug 2019, 17:39
+1 -0
If NLS faculty could keep out Sudheer for so long, why did justice league failed to buy more time to keep NKC at bay for longer at NUJS?
Nlu 28 Aug 2019, 18:13
+2 -0
Looks like NLS has hired BPCD from NLIU
Internet. Really? 28 Aug 2019, 20:45
+8 -2
Pen drops at NLS - Legally India Headline.
NLUO Protest - No coverage.
kianganz 29 Aug 2019, 05:30
+4 -16
Yes, we missed the NLUO protests, but it was covered so widely in the mainstream media, there was not much of value we could add at the time.
Guest 29 Aug 2019, 20:47
+5 -1
Stop making lame excuses Kian. You also missed out the news about the Law Minister's comment refusing INI status NLUs but granting Eminence status to Jindal. The truth is you were busy and your site is understaffed
Diplomatic Much 29 Aug 2019, 04:15
+5 -0
"unspecified roadblocks"? Hahaha
We all know that the Registrar is eyeing the VC spot and wants to defer Sudhir's appointment to such an extent that he can push for his name once the stringed acting VC leaves.
Rami Malek 29 Aug 2019, 06:24
+1 -1
Bhai meri photo kyon laga di! mein toh DU ka pass out hu!
Guest 29 Aug 2019, 18:11
+3 -0
There are no lows to which this interim admin will not sink. One of their lot had refused the use of the A&O Hall to the RCC last year for conducting interviews because he was organising a "conference" there - but guess which firm it was?


Allen & Overy themselves.