What hunger strike? asks NLU Delhi registrar • Dr Maheshwar Singh says consensus reached

Maheshwar Singh reportedly on hunger strike (photo via B&B)
Maheshwar Singh reportedly on hunger strike (photo via B&B)

On 11 August, Bar & Bench had reported that NLU Delhi political science associate professor Dr Maheshwar Singh had gone on a hunger strike, alleging that his application for professorship three years ago had not been considered fairly without having even been notified of rejection.

We have reached out to Singh who said that the strike ended on Thursday, 11 August, and that the matter was being settled internally.

“There’s been a consensus,” he said, adding: “There’s no ill will between me and the administration.”

Regarding the substance of his allegations, Singh declined to comment further, saying that it was an internal matter and, when asked, he clarified that there had been “absolutely no question” of the university having bullied or threatened him, or seeking to brush the matter under the carpet.

That said, NLU Delhi registrar, prof GS Bajpai, has sent us a message with the following statement: “The university does not have any official information about any such strike; no story is required.”

When we spoke to him on the phone earlier today, Bajpai declined to comment further beyond his statement that no official intimation of Singh’s strike had been received.

According to the Bar & Bench reported, Singh had alleged, based on RTI and FIR filings, that promotions at the university were not conducted fairly and that scrutiny committee head Prof KPS Mahalwar had “been implicated in a similar case where he recommended one of the candidates. As it turned out, the documents provided by the candidate were either false or made up”.

“My contention is that the recommendations of the Mahalwar Committee should be put on hold until the allegations against him are cleared,” Singh had said.

We reached out to Mahalwar last week by email but have received no response.

Reportedly Singh had been asked by the university to approach the courts, which Singh was unwilling to do since courts tended not to interfere in university matters and he did not have the “wherewithal” to go to court.

Comments

Flying Jat 16 Aug 2016, 17:32
+4 -1
Without taking any names, national law schools have had a history of being run in an arbitrary manner. There have been instances of irregularities (favours to the high and mighty) in student admissions considering many law schools for quite sometime had separate entrance tests. It is a pity that some meritorious students missed out on getting into these top law schools due to a few backdoor entrants. Why is it that we have had the same set of people from certain regional lobbies heading law schools? Imagine people heading law schools for two decades?! Do we have no new faces with fresh ideas, quality education and international exposure who could take legal education to newer heights? Take a look at the Vice-Chancellors across national law schools and it would not be very difficult to find connections between them. Students from the national law schools are exceptionally meritorius and this is why they have excelled. But yes, someone needs to raise these issues and plug these loopholes. Favouritism in faculty appointments and promotions is just one example of the irregularities. No one dares to raise these issues as ultimately it all depends on which side of the fence you are standing.