'When the media reached there, the girls are safer': TV boss re Nalsar students

Four female Nalsar Hyderabad students were filmed outside a pub with the footage later edited by local television media into allegedly defamatory broadcasts. A week on, the girls have launched online protest campaigns against voyeuristic journalism, and garnered mainstream media support.

Newslaundry summarised the events so far and spoke to the bureau chief of ABN Andhra Jyoti – one of the involved channels.

Newslaundry: What was the story you had in mind?

Shivaprasad: Of course, the pub was running after 10 o clock. Everything that happened was against the law.

Newslaundry: How was it against the law?

Shivaprasad: It is wrong for them to drink and stand outside. Why should they stand outside? Nothing personal against the girls, but you shouldn’t stand on the road at midnight dressed like that. Our main concern is for safety of the girls.

Newslaundry: Then where should they stand?

Shivaprasad: They should not stand like that. They should go straight into the cab and go home.

Newslaundry: So, you think it was a highly unsafe situation?

Shivaprasad: When the media reached there, the girls are safer, if the media is not there, then it’s a problem.

Comments

Torch Them 19 Apr 2013, 15:27
+8 -1
Fucking chauvinist pigs.
abc 19 Apr 2013, 16:58
+11 -1
As evident from the reporting and interivews with politicians, the root cause of this is regional politics. The whole notion of people from North India "polluting" Andhra culture. That is why they picked on a Marwari and Bengali girl and a college like Nalsar, instead of a local college where natives do much worse things. A similar thing is happening at NLSIU. I wish Nalsar goes to court. If they do not, then the media channel will win.
lolz 20 Apr 2013, 06:07
+3 -9
better be aware when you comment. pre-judging with half-baked knowledge is dangerous. worse things, as you claim, were always brought to the fore by the media.

by the way, some one's called them as fucking chauvinist pigs, could you please explain how ?
Mousehunt 5 Jun 2013, 18:12
+1 -0
Let me explain - morons who think it's OK for men to piss on every public road in public view, for guys to pass remarks on girls, and of course to drive over others after drinks, but for girls to be seen outside a pub is hellish violation of some medieval tradition, that is chauvinism of the worst kind in a civilized society. But then hey, since when we we become part of civilization - thats what you are thinking,is'nt it?
SPok 19 Apr 2013, 20:10
+11 -1
What shit. Don't stand outside? Please provide teleportation device, Mr. Shivaprasad.
lolz 20 Apr 2013, 06:09
+2 -2
scantly clad ? dude, you're in india. wake up to the reality. i find nothing amiss with what the reporting, although I do buy into the contention that the whole drama was overstated.
haha 20 Apr 2013, 12:41
+7 -1
If the whole drama was overstated, then that is something amiss with the reporting Einstein.
lolz 20 Apr 2013, 13:31
+2 -11
overstating in the indian media is heavily common mr. newton.

put ur brains to work. look to the prevailing psyche of indian; in particular; the media of andhra.

a saying goes thus: in rome, be like a roman.

now, tailor it to the situation.

i hope, i crystallize my self.
haha 21 Apr 2013, 06:37
+16 -3
just because something is common doesn't mean its right genius. I didn't say it wasn't common, just that somthing was amiss. Lies and shouting is also heavily common in Indian media, and reporting scandalous half-truths for TRPs is especially common in the regional media. That definitely does not mean that nothing is amiss.

Also, the fact that these girls don't want to live by the prevailing psyche of the andhra regional news media doesn't make them wrong. By that logic, you'll say that if you're a guy living in certain parts of north India you must sexually harass girls (after eating chinese fast food).

Please understand that these girls are the victim of a crime. It is illegal to record people against their will in such circumstances, which is what they've been saying at a later stage. What you're saying is exactly the same as saying that a rape victim asked for it because of the clothes she wore.

And the saying is, when in rome, do as the romans do.

And I'm really curious, how does one crystallize themself? I always thought it involved boiling in hot water and then cooling in the fridge. If yes, why do you hope you do that?
amiss 20 Apr 2013, 12:50
+8 -2
Why were the cameras rolling when the people being recorded repeatedly asked for them to stop. There was no public interest in the story that required an overriding of individual privacy. Doesn't the fact that the media channels openly admitted that they had no interest in discovering the cause of the original problem bother you? Isn't that what the media is supposed to do?

And the fact that they chose to then distort the truth through the editing as well as blatant falsehoods in the covering commentary also disturbs me.

Good on these kids for sticking it to this news channel. Unfortunately, it doesn't look lithe they've learnt their lesson yet. Hopefully they will soon.
without malice 21 Apr 2013, 05:35
+5 -8
Has anyone watched the videos, if not please do before commenting. I wonder why the students reacted in such an aggressive manner, with so much expletive usage. I also wonder why they covered their faces. Theres nothing wrong in going to a pub if one is above drinking age and IMHO if they had not reacted so violently the TV channels would have not had anything worth reporting. Pretty obvious they played into the hands of the film crew.
wtf? 21 Apr 2013, 06:29
+7 -1
They were indignant because a random person (and then a news channel) was recording them without their consent. They were, therefore, yelling at the guy and demanding that he hand over the cell phone. Then the genius reporter started, so they covered their faces. I agree entirely that there's nothing wrong with going to a pub if you're above the legal drinking age, but that is sort of their point. There's also nothing wrong with waiting for your cab outside a pub, and nobody should have been recording that. When you're a woman in India, I think it's absolutely fine to react with outrage at being recorded against your will. Just because someone is aggressive doesn't mean they're wrong.
Dhwani 1 May 2013, 06:25
+2 -0
If someone comes up to, thrusts a camera up my nose, does not let me leave, than I would shout! Same the girls did! Have you watched the girl's side of story? And we have no right to expect people to behave in a certain way that we expect to. When faced in a similar situation, you could react differently, I could react differently, does not make either one of us wrong!
And if someone tries to take a video of me, without my consent, even in my own house, my first reaction would be to either cover the camera lens or cover my face.
Ram 4 May 2013, 12:42
+1 -0
If you are mobbed by rouge cameraman filming you without their consent, and chasing them...! How do you expect them to react..!
Mousehunt 5 Jun 2013, 18:15
+0 -0
So you believe TV channels are like predators? If you cover your face, they have a right to show you on TV with a made up story?
fin 21 Apr 2013, 06:25
+10 -12
I agree with #5. The students were using F words and showing middle fingers on camerat. Their behaviour did not suggest they were sober. We LI should give the other side of the story also. We all know that there have been disciplinary problems in Nalsar. Are the students angels?
Dhwani 1 May 2013, 06:26
+2 -1
Just because they were using abusive language, does not make them wrong and the intrusion of privacy of media right
Dhwani 1 May 2013, 06:17
+2 -0
Is the situation in India so horrible, that girls cant go out without an escort or media? is India really different from Taliban?
Mousehunt 5 Jun 2013, 18:17
+0 -0
No, the Taliban follow up with actions, indian men dont have as much courage, so they live by vicarious acts and words, thats all.
Feminist Bigot 14 Jan 2014, 17:25
+0 -0
Its funny how you feminist appeasers equate and generalise all men like in your stupid comment showing misandry but cry MISOGYNY at a drop of a hat