SC condemns “contumacious” SCBA; ASG Parasaran, Tankha quit; Clifford Chance scraps partner limbo; India’s law school bubble…

SC strikes down SCBA GBM resolution of 16 Jan 2012 that terminated the SCBA membership of the three members forming the implementation committee set up by SC’s 26 November 2011 judgment in the ‘one bar one vote’ case; Also condemns “contumacious” conduct of SCBA members attending 16 Jan meeting [Order]

2 ASGs follow in ex-solicitor general Gopal Subramanium’s footsteps to quit UPA’s legal team, taking the number of law officers to have quit in the last 10 months to 4. ASG Mohan Parasaran and ASG Vivek Tankha quit after 8 and 3 years, respectively, to move on in their careers [Hindustan Times]

Clifford Chance to scrap the 9-12 month partner improvement period in which partners are warned to improve performance. It will also replace the present 14 day notice of termination period with 3-6 months, in a move to avoid destructive energies from partners “in limbo” [The Lawyer]

India’s law school bubble: Too many law schools, far less employment, even lesser average law grad quality [LSAT Blog]

SC reverses Del HC ruling which held that Copyright Boards are empowered to grant interim compulsory licenses under Section 31 of Copyright Act; Disagrees with HC on board’s implied power, since statute silent [Spicy IP India][Order]

Senior advocate and amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran chin-ups to SC Special Investigation Team’s report citing lack of evidence supporting Narendra Modi’s complicity in Gujarat Riots; Asks for prosecution under IPC 153A [Indian Express]

SC orders govt to phase out subsidy to Haj pilgrims in 10 years, while hearing a Central govt appeal against Bom HC direction that official delegations should accompany Haj pilgrims. SC expanded Centre’s plea of limited grant and looked into the very legality of the Haj subsidy [PTI][Judgment]

Comments

Jal Cooper 8 May 2012, 13:05
+3 -0
Regarding the Law School bubble this is a serious problem in england also. Too many colleges are enticing students to study vocational courses in law (and charging v. high fees) with very little prospect of employment afterwards.
M 8 May 2012, 19:23
+1 -0
Problem is too few jobs, not too many NLUs (remember our population is over a billion). The real issues that are leading to the problem: unequal pay structure in Senior Advocates chambers leading to low job creation in the bar, absence of Indian Judicial Service so no govt jobs, BCI opposing liberalisation, and perhaps most of all the Indian economy in decline. Remember plans for the new NLUs were made when the NDA was in power. We had a healthy growth rate and people thought India will be double digit growth like China. Just see what has happened.
veritas 9 May 2012, 07:17
+0 -0
You are right...The Senior Advocates should realise that law grads trained at these NLUs are certainly better than the ones they used to get to assist them five years back...they are academically more sound and most of them have not picked up law as a last resort to a failing/ less ambitious career....plus these kids spend on between 8-12 lacs on an average in those five years...and most importantly a few well paid juniors under you are not going to hurt your wallet...
Delhi Lawyer 9 May 2012, 09:19
+0 -0
The Senior Advocates practising currently have not passed out from either NLS or any 5 years law schools.