First moot organisers conference to decide on ‘near perfect’ moot formats & harmonisation on 24 March

[[NLIU Bhopal]], in association with Surana & Surana International Attorneys is hosting a unique conference for moot organisers in India, which will attempt to debate, rationalise and standardise the various moot formats being followed in the country and come out with a single, unified moot format for the benefit of the mooting community.

The conference is scheduled to kick off at NLIU Bhopal on 24 March 2012.

The proposed event is the brainchild of Bishen Jeswant, student convenor of NLIU Bhopal’s moot court committee.

Jeswant told Legally India that he rued the non-existence of a standard mooting format in India today.

“Through this event we intend to formulate, after intense discussions, a near perfect model that ensures that the best teams win. Once all the moot organisers arrive at a consensus on the standard model, they can sign a resolution and share the standard moot format with other moot organisers.” Jeswant stated that he was targeting around 20 law school moot organisers for participation at the conference.

MPL 3 Quicklinks:

MPL 3: Cleverer, shinier, more polished
MPL 3: Cleverer, shinier, more polished

Formatting

The conference note explains that most Indian moots follow either the ‘two wins’ or the ‘cumulative score’ format for deciding the eight quarter-finalists in a competition.

Under the ‘two wins’ format, the teams which win both their preliminary rounds break into the quarters. If less than eight teams manage to win both the prelim rounds, the teams with a single win, in order of their prelim scores, break in to the quarters.

Jeswant explained that even though this format seems straightforward and simple, it does not ensure that the top eight teams break into the quarters. “If the best team in the competition faces the second best team in the competition in one of the preliminary rounds, the second best team is likely to be eliminated at this stage itself.”

On the other hand, under the ‘cumulative score’ format, which is followed in few Indian moots, the top eight teams are decided based on the speaker / memo scores in the prelim rounds. “The fact that Indian moot judges have a different scale or range of marking makes this format difficult to survive”, elaborated Jeswant.

Greater good

Apart from reconciling and arriving a standard moot format, the three-day conference will also discuss the viability of arriving at standard marking parameters for judges with a focus on limiting subjectivity in moot judging.

“We also intend to discuss other issues like having a fixed annual mooting calendar based on the academic schedules of various law schools to ensure maximum participation in each moot,” said Jeswant.

Other items on the agenda include organising regular annual pre-moots to improve India’s performance at prominent international moots, organising annual moot camps at each law school by rotation to increase interaction between ex-mooters and current students.

Jeswant stated that while inter law school mud slinging is not uncommon, law schools working together for a common good definitely is. “Moot convenors / organisers have a duty, not only to their own institutions but for mooting in general and this is a fine opportunity for students to come together and improve the already thriving Indian mooting scene.”

The conference is sponsored by Surana & Surana International Attorneys which organises around 10 moots in India every year, including the India qualifying rounds of prestigious international moots like Jessup and Stetson.

Legally India is media partner of the event.

Convenor additions:

Invitation and notes

  • The Convenor and Co-Convenor (or the 2 seniormost members, by whatever designation known) of each University’s Moot Court Association (or Moot Committee by whatever name known) are invited. If the Convener/Co-Convener are unable to attend the Conference, another representative(s) may be nominated to represent the University.
  • Accommodation will be provided to 2 members from each University (23rd evening to 26th morning)
  • All meals will be provided to all the members at the Conference
  • Pick up and Drop facility to and from the station/airport will be provided.
  • Each University is encourage to make a presentation (using a ppt if you so wish) elaborating their ideas and views. Kindly note that the presentation is purely optional.
  • An All Star Moot Round involving experienced champion mooters from the past is also planned.
  • Certificates and mementos acknowledging their role in this event will be awarded to all participants of the Conference.

Registration

The process of registration is very simple. The Convener/Co Convener (or their nominated representatives) have to simply send an email to conveying their intention to participate in the Conference. Subsequently, the travel plans should be sent it as soon as possible. We recommend you book your tickets well in advance to avoid last minute hassles.

Comments and further ideas are invited below.

[[Mooting Premier League 3 season standings]]

For more information please refer to the [[MPL 3 rulebook]].

Comments

@ Bishen and Bhopal 2 Feb 2012, 09:50
+1 -0
'Two wins' is better than'cumulative score' because judges in different courtrooms mark differently. If there are many teams, then two wins should form a shortlist, between who cumulative score may be considered, although two wins is usually able to decide the outcome in most moots which follow the format. The judges vary considerably in their marking and some may mark an average speaker at 65% while some judge may think the best mooter he has seen deserves 75%. Some judges mark as high as 98%!
Lawyer 2 Feb 2012, 10:33
+2 -0
Improve the judging at Jessup and Stetson Nationals. Get ex-Jessup and Stetson international round mooters to judge the rounds (there are so many of them in India. Please. It's long, long overdue. Everyone who has participated at Jessup and Stetson nationals, no matter how badly or how well they've done, knows in their heart that the judging is awful.
Dom 2 Feb 2012, 13:58
+0 -0
Agreed. and thank you !!
Solution 3 Feb 2012, 05:56
+1 -0
Get lawschool alumni who have been mooters to judge.
abc 8 Feb 2012, 10:21
+0 -0
I concur. Surana should organise a conference on how NOT to organise a moot
Le 2 Feb 2012, 13:15
+0 -0
at least someone is thinking rationally, LI should also chip in the seminar as online partner
Ex student, ex mooter 2 Feb 2012, 14:02
+4 -0
Get Surana out of the picture for better mooting in India. They may be giving some sponsorship, but they have no sense when it comes to judging (either oral or memorial).
This is not a case of sour grapes, I have participated and done well at previous Surana moots.
Also involve those who have participated at international moots that are considered to be among the better-organised.
asd 2 Feb 2012, 16:07
+0 -0
this is pathetic .... mooting needs to stay in place ..... stop making such a bug fusss
Thanks 2 Feb 2012, 18:42
+0 -0
Thanks for your concern. This conference was intended to change mooting's "place".

Grow up dude. And accept that every system is in some way broken, and needs changes. Great initiative Bishen.
NLIU 2 Feb 2012, 16:31
+0 -0
It is important that Surana is part of the event for the simple reason that they host around 10 moots every year. In fact, Mr.Ravichandran will be at the Conference and he is open to criticism.. the format and other items on the agenda which will be discussed by the convener, will eventually be applicable even to Surana Competitions.. so there could possible be an improvement in those events in the future..
NLIU 2 Feb 2012, 16:34
+0 -0
@ #1: We don't need to decide on one of the two existing formats.. the points is to find a way in which we can do away with the faults in both formats.. In fact, we do have couple of solutions, all of which will be discussed in detail at the Conference..
No.1 3 Feb 2012, 05:58
+0 -0
Sure! I was just being provocative. Heh. Good stuff this.
Rational Apple 2 Feb 2012, 17:36
+0 -0
Thank goodness someone has taken the initiative of cleaning up the randomness every moot offers in the name of a "format" which the "organizers reserve the right to amend/modify" any time during the competition!
Dom 2 Feb 2012, 19:41
+0 -0
Kian please stop adding Bhopal after NLIU in each sentence. Almost everyone knows Bhopal's NLU is called NLIU. States have been wise enough to give unique names to their respective NLUs.
kianganz 2 Feb 2012, 19:56
+2 -0
It's actually a house style point that by default, any NLS that we mention gets the location added when it is first mentioned in a story. This is useful for newcomers who might not know that NLIU is in Bhopal. Second of all, there are a bunch of acronyms these days with all the new NLSes. And NLU for example is common to at least Jodhpur and Delhi now.

And if that point applies, we should never say Nalsar Hyderabad, or NUJS Kolkata, since those are fairly unique...1

Why does it bother you so much to have NLIU mentioned in conjunction with Bhopal?

Best
Kian
Please! 3 Feb 2012, 06:18
+0 -0
It bothers Dom because he is an [...]. He's possibly downed a bottle of Dom and blabberring incoherent nonsense. Keep up the good work.
concerned 4 Feb 2012, 18:55
+0 -0
Hi Kian,
Great to see you here. Would you please consider taking some time out and discussing the MPL moots?
Please! 3 Feb 2012, 06:00
+0 -0
Let LI do their job. Not everyone knows every lawschool - LI caters to lawyers who may not even know the various lawschools. And some state NLU students "hold themselves out" as NLU, although the NLU is in Jodhpur.
Indian mooter 2 Feb 2012, 21:47
+1 -0
The theme of the conference is quite novel. We do need to rethink the existing moot systems and come out with a standard moot policy in India. Considering the growing number of law schools and allied moot court competitions in the country, the conference should be a watershed for a transparent and rational mooting system in India.