NUJS, RGNUL win in Stetson moot nationals to represent India in Florida 2015 with Nalsar, NLU-J

MPL 6: Rocking it.
MPL 6: Rocking it.
The team from NUJS Kolkata bested RGNUL Patiala in the finals of the national rounds of Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition.

The team from NUJS Kolkata comprising of Sanchith Shivakumar, Udbhav Tiwari, Savitran Ramesh and Shruti Khetan bested RGNUL, Patiala in the finals of the national rounds of Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition held at The Law School, University Of Jammu from 28 to 30 November 2014.

NUJS and RGNUL will be representing India at the International Finals to be held at Stetson University College of Law from 16 to 18 April 2015.

The moot problem, this year, was based on shark finning and trade restrictions and the forum was International Court of Justice.

Sagnik Das from NLU Jodhpur was awarded the best speaker award in the competition while the best memorial award went to GNLU Gandhinagar.

NLU Jodhpur and NALSAR were the other two semi finalists in the competition, and have also qualified for the Stetson world rounds.

Unlike previous years when there were two separate north India and south India qualifiers, this time there was only one national round.

More moots being updated into the rankings

At A Glance: Law School Wise

Law SchoolAwardScore
NUJS KolkataStetson (Winner) T320
RGNUL Patiala Stetson (Runners Up) T310
GNLU GandhinagarStetson (Best Memorial) T310
NLU JodhpurStetson (Semi Finalists + Best Speaker) T35+10=15
NALSAR HyderabadStetson (Semi Finalists) T35
Law College, University of JammuStetson (Organizer) T32

At A Glance: Moot Wise

MootLaw School
Winners NUJS Kolkata
Runners UpRGNUL Patiala
Best Memorial GNLU Gandhinagar
Best SpeakerSagnik Das, NLU Jodhpur
Semi FinalistsNLU Jodhpur & NALSAR Hyderabad

MPL Season 6 Standings

RankLaw SchoolPointsAwards
1NLU Delhi75Manfred Lachs World (Winner + Best Speaker)+ CLEA (Best Memorial) T5 = 40 + 30 + 5
2NLIU Bhopal58Raj Anand (Best team + Best memorial + Best speaker) + NLIU Juris Corp (organiser) + Amity (Best Memorial) T5 + CLEA (Winners + Best Speaker) T5 + BCI (Semi Finalists) T3= 15 + 8 + 8 + 2 + 5 +15 + 5
3NLU Jodhpur39Henry Dunant (Best team) = 20; Surana IT (Semi Finalist) T4= 4; Stetson (Semi Finalists + Best Speaker) T3 =10+5
4RMLNLU Lucknow36Henry Dunant (runners up + Best Memorial) + Raj Anand (semi finalist) = 10 + 10 + 4 = 24; Surana IT (Semi Finalist + Best Speaker) T4= 4+8
5NLUO Cuttack36Henry Dunant (Best researcher + semi finalist) = 10 + 5 = 15; Amity (Runners Up) T5= 5; Surana IT (Runners Up+ Best Memorial) T4 = 8+ 8
6ILNU Ahmedabad34BR Sawhney (Semi Finalist) T4 = 4 ; BCI (Winner + Best Speaker) T3 =20+10= 30
7NLSIU Bangalore29Raj Anand (runners up) = 8; BR Sawhney (Runners Up + Best Speaker) T4 + CLEA (Runners Up) T5 = 8 +8 + 5= 21
8NUJS Kolkata28CLEA (Semi finalists) T5; BCI (Semi Finalists) T3; Stetson (Winner) T3 = 3 + 5 + 20
9ILS Pune27NLIU Juris Corp (Best team + Best speaker) = 15 + 8 = 23; BR Sawhney (Semi Finalist) T4 = 4
10NALSAR Hyderabad27BR Sawhney (Org)T4 = 2; Amity (Winners) T5= 10; BCI (Runners Up) T3 =10: Stetson (Semi Finalists) T3 = 5
11HNLU Raipur23NLIU Juris Corp (Runners up) = 8; BR Sawhney (Winners) T4 = 15
12RGNUL Patiala18BR Sawhney (Best Memorial) T4; Stetson (Runners Up) T3 = 8 + 10
13KLA15Henry Dunant (Best speaker + semi finalist) = 10 + 5 = 15
14School of Law, Sashtra University15Surana IT (Winners) T4 = 15
15Symbiosis Pune14Raj Anand (semi finalist) + Juris Corp (Best researcher) = 4 + 8 = 12; Surana IT (Organizer) T4= 2
16GNLU Gandhinagar10Stetson (Best Memorial) T3
17NUSRL Ranchi8NLIU Juris Corp (Best memorial) = 8
18NUALS Kochi8Amity (Semi Finalist + Best Speaker) T5 = 3+5 = 8
19CNLU Patna6Amity (Best Researcher) T5 + CLEA (Organizer) = 5+1
20GLC Mumbai3Amity (Semi Finalist) T5 = 3
21BILS Bangalore3CLEA (Semi finalists) T5
22Lloyd Law College2BCI (Organizer) T3 = 2
23Law College, University of Jammu2Stetson (Organizer) T3
23Amity Noida1Amity (Org) T5 = 1

Comments

Guest 7 Dec 2014, 09:16
+2 -1
Please update the lists? High time now. Semifinalists of most T4 moots havent been given points whereas some are. E.g. juriscorp moot
Kaizer 7 Dec 2014, 09:36
+1 -0
I still don't get it how you guys are giving organiser points to colleges TAKING PART in the competition? WTF?
kianganz 7 Dec 2014, 10:06
+2 -1
Thanks, will amend shortly.
Janardhan Pashupati 7 Dec 2014, 09:38
+1 -0
Go Prashant!
Bring forth the complete story 7 Dec 2014, 09:49
+2 -1
Rizvi??
Edit required 7 Dec 2014, 17:43
+4 -0
When you had India - North & South Rounds only the finalists qualified for the International Competition.

However, from the current year onwards, with only a single [u][b]National Round[/b][/u] - having Prelims, Octas, Quarters, Semis & Finals - all four semi-finalists will be representing India.

This is a move back to the pre-2007 position w.r.t both Stetson & Jessup. Therefore, it is NUJS, RGNUL, NLU-J & NALSAR that shall be representing India in the International Competition. Kindly correct the body of the article accordingly.
mooter 7 Dec 2014, 18:56
+2 -0
I beleive that the tiers of jessup and Stetson should not be changed. As far as Stetson is concerned, it is a tier Ii moot. So its national rounds can only be in tier iii or the below tiers. As far as Jessup nationals are concerned, they should not be upgraded to tier ii as the level of competition in moots such as Oxford media, Stetson, Henry is any day better than jessup national rounds. No points to be given to the regional rounds as it only acts as a screening mechanism.
Edit required 8 Dec 2014, 07:50
+0 -0
[quote name="mooter"]I beleive that the tiers of jessup and Stetson should not be changed. As far as Stetson is concerned, it is a tier Ii moot. So its national rounds can only be in tier iii or the below tiers. As far as Jessup nationals are concerned, they should not be upgraded to tier ii as the level of competition in moots such as Oxford media, Stetson, Henry is any day better than jessup national rounds. No points to be given to the regional rounds as it only acts as a screening mechanism.[/quote]

You responded to my post below here by claiming that National Rounds for Stetson & Jessup ought to remain in Tier-III as the International Rounds of one of them are in Tier-II. Agreed.

However, as you may see I started my post below stating that a 'new' category ought to be introduced. Let me clarify it by saying that this category needs to lie between Tier-II & Tier-III.

...

w.r.t screening mechanism defense vis-a-vis Henry Dunant rounds - I would say that the regional rounds still require work on a comprehensive issue and is a complete moot. I wouldn't say its level is below most Tier-V domestic law moots anyways.
Edit required 7 Dec 2014, 17:56
+2 -0
You might also have to consider a new category for scoring of MPL points. This is due to the fact that there has been a material change in the conduct of three important moots making them way tougher than before:

1. Jessup National Rounds
2. Stetson National Rounds, &
3. Henry Dunant Regional & National Rounds

[u][b]The first two [/b][/u]were previously in category III but they were so as separate Regional Rounds. This meant that North Indian & South Indian teams went their separate way and never faced off. From this year on you'll have all the mooting heavyweights in one single pool. Meaning that even getting-out of prelims will be tougher as chances of meetings between stronger teams are higher. For eg:

NLS could previously only meet (am only mentioning prominent ones. Any omission is purely accidental and not supposed to reflect perceived image of any institution) NALSAR, SOEL, GLC, ILS, Symbi, NUALS, Christ etc to qualify. However, now they would have to take on not only these but the heavyweights of the North as well - NLIU, NUJS, NLU-J, RMLNLU, RGNUL, Amity, GNLU, HNLU, Jindal, NLU-D etc.

Thus, for teams that do well at Stetson & Jessup this year on will deserve more points than were awarded under MPL-V scorebook.

[u][b]W.r.t Henry Dunant[/b][/u]: They have also changed to a qualification format for the National Rounds. This means teams first must take part in H.D North or H.D South, and reach a certain stage to be invited for Henry Dunant Nationals.

You have currently given points only to the National Round teams, thus not reflecting the performance of people in the Regional rounds. Maybe the regional can be put at Tier-V and given some acknowledgement in the MPL.

Hopefully you will either make certain changes or revert back with a write-up on MPL scoring explaining why these changes ought not to be made.
Moped 8 Dec 2014, 09:18
+0 -2
NUJS is best. End of story.