NUJS seizes MPL lead from NLU Delhi post Commonwealth Moot; GNLU, NLU-J perform at Paris ICC

Mooting Premier League 2010-11 - MPL2
Mooting Premier League 2010-11 - MPL2
[[NUJS Kolkata]] reached the semifinals and won the best speaker award as the Indian representative at the [[Commonwealth Moot Court Competition|Commonwealth Moot]] to pull in 12 crucial points from the Tier 4 National Challenger moot, overtaking [[NLU Delhi]] at the top of the MPL 2 standings by four points.

The 12th Commonwealth Moot was held as a part of the 17th Commonwealth Law Conference which took place at Hyderabad from 5th to 9th February. After initial selections in various regions, twelve commonwealth teams vied in the international rounds with the team from Sri Lanka emerging victorious after beating Nigeria in the finals. India and Canada were the semifinalists in the moot. Australia, South Africa, Bangladesh, Trinidad and Tobago and Uganda were among the other teams that participated in the moot. The moot problem was based on public international law.

MPL 2 Quicklinks:

The young team of NUJS consisted of first year Payoshi Roy, who won the best orator award along with Nayantara Ranganathan and Puneeth Ganapathy of the second year. Roy told Legally India that her first moot was a lot of fun. “The judges were looking for some understanding and jurisprudence behind the law you knew and not how much law you knew”, she said. She added that the teams from Nigeria, South Africa and Sri Lanka were really good.

Santhaan Krishnan, an organizer of the Moot confirmed the results and said that they had roped in personalities who attended the conference to judge the moot. He also said that the next Commonwealth Moot will be held at Cape Town.

Paris ICC Mediation

Meanwhile, [[GNLU Gandhinagar|Gujarat National Law University]] picked up the ‘Special Award for the Team Which Best Acknowledged Cultural Differences’ at the 6th [[ICC International Commercial Mediation Moot Court Competition, Paris|ICC Mediation Moot]] in Paris.

[[NLU Jodhpur]] reached the quarterfinals of the competition. GNLU gains three points for the honourable mention in this Tier 5 international moot, where no points are available under the rules for making it to the last eight.

Five Indian teams including [[NLSIU Bangalore]], [[NLIU Bhopal]] and [[School of Excellence in Law (SOEL) Chennai|SOEL Chennai]] contested with a record-breaking 53 other teams from 26 different countries. Organisers Mathilde Vital Durand and Hannah Tümpel confirmed the results and said that India has always been a country well-represented in the cmpetition since its creation. The GNLU team consisted of Tuhin Sharma, Mansi Tewari, Prateeti Gaur and Tarang Shashishekhar and the NLU Jodhpur team consisted of Aditya Gupte, Varsha Nair, Saumya Sharma and coach Srinivas Vishven.

GNLU’s Gaur said that they faced teams from Serbia, Lebanon, Israel and Switzerland in the preliminary rounds. “The art of listening carefully before speaking paid off. We listened to what the other party had to say and then answered. It requires some patience and you have to be cordial and polite. Even in tough situations we were polite”. She hopes that mediation would really find its launching pad in India because of the world becoming smaller and the many international commercial prospects in India.

With the [[Bar Council of India International Law Moot Court Competition|BCI Moot]], [[DM Harish Memorial Government Law College International Moot Court Competition|DM Harish Moot]] and four other moots lined up this weekend, the MPL Standings are set to get ruffled.

[[Mooting Premier League 2 season standings]]

PosLaw schoolPtsDetails
1NUJS Kolkata75[Commonwealth International Rounds] (Best Speaker, Semifinalist); Jessup North (Runners-up, Best Memorandum); Oxford-Media India Round (Winner); Commonwealth India Rounds (Winners; Best Memo); Nalsar B.R. Sawhny Moot (Best Memo, Best Speaker, Semi-finalist)
2NLU Delhi71Jessup North (Winner, Best Speaker); KK Luthra (Runners up); HNLU Moot (Winner, Best Speaker, Best Researcher) Nalsar B.R. Sawhny Moot (Semi finalist) Henry Dunant (Runners up)
3NLSIU Bangalore58Jessup South (Best Speaker, Semifinalist); KK Luthra (Semi finalist); Oxford-Media India Round (Runners up, Best speaker); Stetson South India (Semi-finalist), Nani Palkhiwala (Best Speaker), Rizvi Moot (Winners)
4Nalsar Hyderabad56Jessup South (Runners up);NLIU-Juris Corp (Best speaker); Stetson South India (Winner), Nani Palkhiwala (Winners), Surana Int\‘l Minority (Semifinalist); Surana Tiral Advocacy South (Seminfinalist)
5NLIU Bhopal49Stetson North (Semi finalist); HNLU Moot {Semi-finalist) Nani Palkhiwala (Best Researcher), Surana Trial Advocacy North (Winners, Best Speaker), Henry Dunant (Semifinalist, Best Memo), Rizvi Moot (semi-finalist)
6ILS Pune45Jessup South (Winners, Best Memorandum);Stetson South India (Semi-finalist), Surana Trial Advocacy South (Winners)
7RGNUL Patiala36KK Luthra (Best speaker); Stetson North (Semi finalist, best speaker); NLIU-Juris Corp (Semi finalist); Surana Trial Advocacy North (Runners up), Rizvi Moot (best speaker)
8NUALS Kochi35Stetson South India (Runner-up, Best Memo), Nalsar B.R. Sawhny Moot (Runner up) Surana Trial Advocacy North (Best Memo), Surana Int\‘l Minority (Runners up)
9HNLU Raipur34Oxford-Media India Round (Semi finalist); NLIU-Juris Corp (Winner); Henry Dunant (Winners)
10SOEL Chennai30Commonwealth India Rounds (Runners up, Best Speaker); Surana Int\‘l Minority (Winners), Surana Tiral Advocacy South (Runners up, Best Speaker)
11UILS Chandigarh23Stetson North (Runners up); Nani Palkhiwala (Runners Up), Surana Trial Advocacy South (Best Memo)
12Campus Law Centre Delhi20HNLU Moot (Runners up, Best Memorandum) Nalsar B.R. Sawhny Moot (Winner)
12NLU Jodhpur20Oxford-Media India Round (Semi finalist, Best memorandum); NLIU-Juris Corp (Runners up); Maritime International Arbitration Moot, Sydney (The Sarah Derrington Encouragement Award)*
12University School of Law and Legal Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprashta University, Delhi20Stetson North (Winner)
13Army Institute of Law, Mohali19Nani Palkhiwala (Semifinalist), Surana Int\‘l Minority(Best Memo), Rizvi Moot (runner-up, best memo)
14Amity Law School18Jessup North (Semi-finalist); Stetson North (Best memorandum); Commonwealth India Rounds (Semi finalists)
15GNLU Gandhinagar16[ICC Mediation] (Special Award for the Team Which Best Acknowledged Cultural Differences);Commonwealth India Rounds (Semi finalists); John Marshall (Winner, Ambassador Round), Nani Palkhiwala (Semifinalist), Surana Trial Advocacy North (Semifinalist)
16Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad15Henry Dunant (Semifinalist, Best Speaker)
16Law Centre I (LC-I) Delhi University15FDI Moot (Semi-finalist; 2 Honourable Mentions); Surana Trial Advocacy North (Semifinalist), Rizvi Moot (semifinalist)
17Government Law College, Mumbai13Jessup South (Semifinalist);Nani Palkhiwala (Best Memo)
17CNLU Patna13Jessup North (Semi-finalist); NLIU-Juris Corp (Semi finalist, Best Memorandum)
18Bishop Cottons Women’s Christian Law School, Bangalore10Stetson South India (Best Speaker)
18RMNLU Lucknow10Henry Dunant (Best Researcher)
19Seedling School of Law and Governance, Jaipur5Surana Int\‘l Minority (Best Speaker)
20CUSAT Kochi3Surana Int\‘l Minority(Semifinalist)
20Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT, Kharagpur 3HNLU Moot (Semi finalist)
20New Law College, Bharti Vidayapeeth University, Pune3Surana Trial Advocacy South (Semifinalist)

Legend: T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 (total points won in each tier); Pos (Position); W (Wins); R/u (Runner-ups); S/F- Semifinalist; B S (Best speaker); B M/R (Best Memorial/Researcher); HM (Honorable Mention & other equivalent awards); Pts (Points) For more information please refer to the [[MPL 2 rulebook]].

Comments

Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 14:33
+1 -0
great going NUJS!
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 14:33
+1 -0
Good to see NUJS where it belongs.
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 15:42
+1 -0
Congrats NUJS team. This is the third mooting achievement this year for Payoshi, a first year student. Way to go. Also, I hope this answers all those who said last year that NUJS does not allow juniors to moot and repeats senior mooters.
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 16:42
+1 -1
Very proud you all. The trend that the mooting scene in NUJS has a talented younger crop is very encouraging. This should inspire the juniors in all places. Congratulations NUJS! Keep it up!
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 17:07
+1 -0
Congratulations Team NUJS!! Well done.
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 18:44
+0 -0
the gap between top two aren't big, it's only a matter of time when its bridged. NALSAR is yet to pull out the rabbit from its hat, and when that happens a new order shall be established.
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 19:13
+0 -0
NUJS fans have invaded the blog.
Anonymous guest 9 Feb 2011, 21:28
+0 -0
IMHO it would be convenient if pages providing news snippets on MPL2 also had a link on the final MPL1 standing, it would ease comparison of changes in winning pattern etc. and help foster 'healthier' debate and discussions.
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 00:44
+0 -0
what matters is the final standing at the end. there some big moots ahead...anything can happen. remember NUJS that KKR was at the top of IPL after their first few matches but later finished at the bottom :-)
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 01:20
+0 -0
@9, KKR and NUJS analogy is something that has been used too often and for no apparent reason. the first time it was used on an LI comment, NUJS replied with the ELSA world championship and the third NLS arbitration win in the following week. there are big moots ahead. nujs has always scored more from big moots than the smaller ones. looking forward to seeing NUJS finish at the top with the largest possible margin
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 03:10
+0 -0
http://www.legallyindia.com/20100610948/Mooting/mpl-2009-10-nalsar-ites-are-best-indian-mooters-share-rs-15-lakh-prizes-with-7-runners-up

http://www.legallyindia.com/201008231223/Mooting/mooting-premier-league-mpl-alternative-winners-nlsiu-and-nujs-and-welcome-to-mpl-2


Check out these two links, I dont think performance of NUJS was that bad last year. It was not at the bottom If the link is not wrong. Just Check it out. It was at the third position.
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 03:13
+0 -0
I think you are Nalsarite
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 07:55
+0 -0
@12: Genius!
Anonymous guest 10 Feb 2011, 17:13
+0 -0
@Kian, please decide on the inclusion of the Fiat Justitia moot at the earliest. The moot is scheduled for the end of the month and it will be unfair to make an addition after the results become known. I think it must be added as the three moot problems set by V. Niranjan are extremely challenging and as the moot, last year (as Govind Swaminathan Moot) saw very good judging.
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 05:14
+0 -0
I dont know about judging at GLC Chennai. But I have read the problem and someone's memorials, it requires lot of research and stamina to hold it for 40 days, with a fear in mind that your memorials for the next rounds may not be used. And I heard that 24 participating teams are participating. If problem, participation and judging all are good, I would say it needs to be included in Tier 4 being the national challenger.
Yeah please, whether tier 4 or tier 5, whether yes or no? please clarify before the competition starts, and results are public.
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 20:52
+0 -0
BAD JUDGING AND SHEER LUCK HELP A LOT TO NUJS.......
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 22:48
+0 -0
and ur comment is based on?
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 22:49
+0 -0
@16, I thought NUJS team was the only Indian team in the Commonwealth International round. So how the hell would you have this piece of cool inside information?
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 23:29
+0 -0
I agree with 16. NUJS has always thrived on "bad judging and sheer luck". I am sure about the luck part because i have seen carrying some sort of talisman to one of the international moot. besides my granny always warned me about "BUUNGAAL KA KALA JAADU". about bad judging, i guess there should a provision for review petition even for moot court judgements.
Anonymous guest 11 Feb 2011, 23:51
+0 -0
@16. There should be basis on what you are commenting. Your comment is quite absurd.

@19. Dude. Please come out of your old thoughts and live like a matured person in a real world. It is not only about NUJS, there are people who cannot accept win of other colleges and provide absurd comment.

And you take on Bengal is very immature. It has institutions which are considered to be one of the best in India, IIM, St. Xavier, IIT Kgp, NUJS.
Anonymous guest 12 Feb 2011, 07:52
+0 -0
I think Mr. 16 has a very valid point. and all of us at some point of time have observed NUJS winning big moots out of no where, if not sheer luck what else can fetch them such victories.
and bad judgement comes as no surprise, people from bengal have been using mind controlling techniques for ages. Its quite possible that these students from bengal use such techniques to doctor the end result. if my sources are to be believed, P.C. Sarkar offers an annual lecture on "Law & Presentation". No wonder these guys always appear in shiny clothes with their eyes lined with kohl.
Peace out
Anonymous guest 12 Feb 2011, 08:32
+0 -0
Agreeing with #16 and #21. A lot of my friends tell me that they have withnessed actual hyptnotism being practised by NUJS mooters in court rooms. Every student has to attend as Law and Presentation class. And those who manage to pass, get selected for moot courts. Also since all NUJS kids are ''Bengalis'', they are just lucky.
Anonymous guest 12 Feb 2011, 14:42
+0 -0
@21.Wow!Let me clear the facts

1. NUJS is the only Indian team to win Vienna Moot ( Remember only Indian Team , that too in its 3rd year ).

2. Runners-up in the Commonwealth Moot in the same year.

3. Stenson International Evironment Moot Court Competition, 2005.

4. ELSA WTO Moot, 2006

5. Semi-Finalist, Manfred , 2009 ( dont remember the year )

Dude, grow up and check the fact before commenting. These are only International Moots.

@22. Buddy, Hardly 10% in each batch are Bengali . And I do not how does that make sense.


Grow up Guys. I dont know why people like are not able accept defeat of your college and make absurd comment . And I think you are one of those who could not get into a good law college. That is why showing your frustation
Anonymous guest 12 Feb 2011, 16:51
+0 -0
23 -

you're an embarrassment. can you not recognise obvious sarcasm?