SOEL Chennai victorious over Nuals Kochi at Surana Int’l Minority Rights; And version 2.03 MPL rules

Mooting Premier League 2010-11 - MPL2
Mooting Premier League 2010-11 - MPL2

[[School of Excellence in Law (SOEL) Chennai]] emerged as winners in the [[Surana & Surana International Minority Rights Moot Court Competition]], defeating [[Nuals Kochi]] in the finals.

The moot was organised by Surana & Surana International Attorneys jointly with Maharashtra Cosmopolitan Education Society. The three-day event took place at A.K.K. New Law Academy Pune and saw participation from 33 teams across the country.

Nalsar Hyderabad and School of Legal Studies, CUSAT Kochi were the semi-finalists in the competition. Deepankar Sharma from [[Seedling School of Law and Governance Jaipur]] won the award for the Best Speaker and [[Army Institute of Law Mohali]] grabbed the Best Memorandum award.

“The Moot was good and the students appreciated the quality of the judges,” said S. Ravichandran, head of academic initiatives at Surana & Surana. “Hon’ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph of the Supreme Court was the Chief Guest for the Awards Ceremony.”

Add details on [[Legallypedia]] about the [[Surana & Surana International Minority Rights Moot Court Competition]] and the winning colleges [[School of Excellence in Law (SOEL) Chennai]] and [[Nuals Kochi]].

MPL Moots: Version 2.03

We have made several changes to the and scoring criteria for [[MPL 2|MPL Season 2]].

Version 2.03 of the [[MPL2 competitions|MPL 2 list of moots]] is here! In all likelihood, this is going to be the final list. We have received numerous suggestions from readers and thank all of you for sharing your time and experience to help us finalise the list.

This version has incorporated only very few changes based on overall feedback. We have added three moots in the fifth tier and we have promoted Amity and IICLAM from Tier 5 to Tier 4. New moots in this list since version 2.02 are in bold and promoted moots are in italics.

We were asked to rethink the reasons of keeping Vis Hong Kong in the first tier. Also, many suggested that Stetson North and Red Cross Finals be promoted to the first tier. After much deliberation and feedback, we have decided not to make any changes in those tiers. The moots in the first Tier have international participation of at least more than 60 Teams (Vienna and Jessup have huge participation, Hong Kong has around 80 Teams and in Manfred Lachs, the winners of the three regional rounds compete in the Finals (each regional round sees participation from around 20 teams). On the other hand, one does not see such huge international participation in the Stetson World Finals or the Red Cross Moot. Hence, they have been retained in the second tier.

The list will be frozen very soon, probably next week.

If you disagree with our selection, let us know in the comments below, or the [[MPL2 competitions|Legallypedia MPL2 page]] or the new special MPL Forum (NOW preferred, rather than later when the MPL is almost over!)

Enter your email address below if you want to join the MPL Google Group. This is a discussion group in which vital MPL decisions will be floated and discussed before they are made. On default settings you will receive up to one email digest per day but you can unsubscribe any time.

Google Groups
Google Groups
Subscribe to Mooting Premier League (MPL)
| Email: |
| [Visit this group](http://groups.google.com/group/mooting) |

Provisional [[MPL2 competitions|list of moots]] to be included in [[MPL 2]]:

As you can see it’s bigger and hopefully even better than last year.

Tier 1 – Global Championships

These include the world finals most prestigious moot court competitions in the world and other world contests involving rigorous competition and wide participation- [[Manfred_Lachs_Space_Moot_Court_Competition#World_Finals|Manfred Lachs Space Moot, World Finals]]

  • [[Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot|Philip C. Jessup, Washington]]
  • [[Willem C. Vis (East) International Commercial Arbitration Moot, Hong Kong|Willem C. Vis (East), Hong Kong]]
  • [[Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot, Vienna|Willem C. Vis, Vienna]]

Tier 2 – World Class

These are the widely recognised international mooting events where a substantial number of Indian teams participate. These moots enjoy worldwide reputation among law students.

  • [[International Criminal Court (ICC) Trial Competition The Hague|ICC Trial Moot, The Hague]]
  • [[Manfred_Lachs_Space_Moot_Court_Competition_Sydney_Rounds|Manfred Lachs Space Moot, Sydney rounds]]
  • [[Red Cross International Humanitarian Law Moot|Red Cross Moot]]
  • [[Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition|Stetson World Rounds]]

Tier 3 – Elite Class

These mooting events are the best of the elite national contests and some of them are the gateway to the Global Championships/World-class moots in the above tiers.

  • [[National Moot Court Competition, Bar Council of India Trust|Bar Council of India moot]]
  • [[DM Harish Memorial Government Law College International Moot Court Competition|DM Harish Moot, GLC]]
  • [[Henry Dunant Memorial Moot Court Competition|Henry Dunant Moot (India qualification rounds to Red Cross Moot)]]
  • [[Oxford International Media Law Moot Court Competition|Oxford Media Law Moot]]
  • [[Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot North India Rounds|Philip C. Jessup North India Rounds]]
  • [[Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot South India Rounds|Philip C. Jessup South India Rounds]]
  • [[Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition North India Rounds|Stetson North India Rounds]]
  • [[Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition South India Rounds|Stetson South India Rounds]]

Tier 4 – National Challengers

Most of the contests in this Tier see participation from the top Indian Law Schools. A large number of them have also carved a niche for themselves in the national mooting scene. It also includes the [[ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law]], which is prestigious but only three Indian teams participated in last year’s Asian selection rounds.

  • [[Commonwealth Moot Court Competition|Commonwealth Moot]]
  • [[ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law|ELSA WTO Moot]]
  • [[GNLU International Moot Court Competition|GNLU International Moot]]
  • [[ISRO National Funding Round to Manfred Lachs Space Moot|ISRO Manfred Lachs funding rounds]]
  • [[KK Luthra Memorial Moot Court Competition, CLC New Delhi|KK Luthra Criminal Law Moot, Delhi]]
  • [[KLA Moot Court Competition, Kerala|KLA Moot, Kerala]]
  • [[MM Singhvi Memorial Bar Council of India International Law Moot Court Competition, NLU Jodhpur|MM Singhvi moot, NLU Jodhpur]]
  • [[Nani Palkhiwala Memorial National Tax Moot Court, GLC Mumbai|Nani Palkhiwala Tax Moot, GLC]]
  • [[NLSIU International Arbitration Moot Court|NLS International Arbitration]]
  • [[NUJS Herbert Smith National Corporate Law Moot Court Competition|NUJS Herbert Smith Corporate Moot]]
  • [[Oxford International Media Law Moot Court Competition|Oxford Media Law Moot]] '''National Qualifiers'''
  • [[Surana & Surana National Corporate Law Moot|Surana Corporate Moot]]
  • [[Surana & Surana International Technology Law Moot|Surana International Technology Moot]]
  • [[Amity Moot Court Competition|Amity Moot Court Competition]]
  • [[International Infrastructure and Construction Law Arbitration Moot (IICLAM)|IICLAM Competition]]

Tier 5 - Best of the Rest

A varied tier that includes good domestic competitions that a range of Indian law schools take part, as well as prestigious international competitions that see only little Indian law school participation.

Tier 5: Domestic

  • [[GH Raisoni Law School Moot Court Competition|GH Raisoni Moot]]
  • [[Justice Hidayatullah Memorial National Moot Court Competition|Justice Hidayatullah Memorial Moot]]
  • [[NFCG-Nalsar Moot Court Competition on Corporate Governance|NFCG-Nalsar Moot on Corporate Governance]]
  • [[Nalsar Justice Bodh Raj Sawhney Moot Court Competition|Nalsar BR Sawhney Moot]]
  • [[NLU Antitrust Moot Court Competition, NLU Jodhpur|NLU Antitrust Moot]]
  • [[All India Corporate Law Moot Court Competition, NLU Delhi|NLU Delhi All India Corporate Moot]]
  • [[Pro Bono Enviro National Moot Court Competition, SOEL Chennai|Pro Bono Enviro Moot SOEL Chennai]]
  • [[Rizvi Moot Court Competition|Rizvi Moot]]
  • [[SP Sathe Moot Court Competition, ILS Pune|SP Sathe Moot, ILS Pune]]
  • [[Surana & Surana International Minority Rights Moot]]
  • [[Surana & Surana National Trial Advocacy Moot#North India round|Surana Trial Advocacy Moot, North India round]]
  • [[Surana & Surana National Trial Advocacy#South India round|Surana Trial Advocacy Moot, South India round]]
  • [[ULC Bangalore All India Moot Court Competition|ULC Bangalore Moot]]
  • [[NLIU Tankha Moot Court Competition|NLIU Tankha Moot]]

Tier 5: International

These moots are internationally prestigious but only currently see limited participation, and are therefore counted on par with Tier 5 moots. This recognises that winning such a competition is noteworthy but that it would not be fair to disadvantage colleges that could not afford to attend these. For example, only three Indian teams participated in ELSA Asian rounds last year, ICC Mediation Paris saw only 4 Indian teams, Frankfurt International Arbitration only three Indian teams, Maritime International Arbitration in Sydney only two Indian teams, and Oxford IPR saw only two to three Indian teams last year.

  • [[ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law, Asian rounds|ELSA WTO Asian rounds]]
  • [[ICC International Commercial Mediation Moot Court Competition, Paris|ICC Moot, Paris]]
  • [[Frankfurt International Arbitration Moot Court Competition|Frankfurt International Arbitration Moot]]
  • [[Maritime International Arbitration Moot Court Competition, Sydney|Maritime International Arbitration Moot, Sydney]]
  • [[Oxford International IPR Moot Court Competition|Oxford IPR Moot]]
  • [[Foreign Direct Investment International Moot Competition, California]]
  • [[John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law, Chicago]]

NB: In future if new information comes to light and moots convincingly satisfy the criteria of a lower or higher tier, the moot may be included in that Tier at the absolute discretion of Legally India’s MPL team. New competitions may also be included but only if there are overwhelming reasons.

Scoring criteria

Category/TiersTier 1 - Global ChampionshipsTier 2 - World ClassTier 3 - Elite ClassTier 4 - National ChallengersTier 5 - Best of the Rest (Int’l & Domestic)
Best team40 points30 points20 points15 points10 points
Runners-up35 points25 points15 points10 points7 points
Best Orator / Memorial / Researcher30 points each20 points each10 points each8 points each (correction)5 points each
Semi finalists25 points15 points10 points4 points (correction)5 points
Quarter Finalists20 points (except Lachs)N/AN/AN/AN/A
Octa Finalists15 points (except Lachs)N/AN/AN/AN/A
Honourable Mention/Other equivalent awards10 points5 pointsN/AN/AInt’l Moots only: 3 points
Stats
Number of competitions4481521
Total possible points for winners160120160225210
Total points for runners-up140100120150147

Do you agree with the scoring criteria? Should more points be given for a tier, or less points?

You can contact the Legally India MPL team, which includes Sanjay Khan and Prashanth from GNLU Gandhinagar on .

If you are a moot court committee or you want to be involved in decisions taken in respect of MPL housekeeping, etc, please sign up to the Google Group email list below.

Google Groups
Google Groups
Subscribe to Mooting Premier League (MPL)
| Email: |
| [Visit this group](http://groups.google.com/group/mooting) |

Comments

Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 00:44
+0 -0
Surana moots...sigh
False News With Balls 21 Sept 2010, 05:24
+0 -0
Seedling School of Law and Governance?? :O Is this real? Or False? My publication could tie up with such institutions. :D. Kidding. Nice to see new-comers emerge.
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 07:20
+0 -0
You ppl missed the point again... Stetson World Finals and Red Cross have national/regional qualification barriers because of which they don't have a "huge number" of international teams. Hong Kong has a direct international round because of which there are 80 teams without qualification. How does that warrant it being in tier 1? Point remains that the competition at Hong Kong, being predominantly Asian is not as tough as Vienna, Jessup or the Lachs Finals.

May be you could have a special mid tier for Hong Kong where the points are less than Jessup and Vienna but more than Red Cross and Stetson? Sorry, but someone winning Hong Kong and someone winning Vienna getting the same points just doesn't look right.
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 07:23
+0 -0
IICLAM appears twice on the list. You might want to check that.
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 15:11
+0 -0
Dear Kian,
The Amity moot might have been around for quite a while. However, the format is the worst I have seen in any moot. There are a few reasons for this:

1. From around 32 teams, there is a direct semi final round. When you bring the number down so drastically, the level of merit in the competition takes a huge dip.
2. The shortlisting is based on aggregate scores. Thus, the rankings after the prelims are highly influenced by 'high scoring' and 'low scoring' courtrooms.
3. 2 times in the last 3 years, they have promised to have quarter finals (as per the invite). This was however altered to 'direct semis' after teams reached the competition. Teams choose moots based on factors such as subject matter, format etc. and have a right to see their legitimate expectations upheld, which the organisers don't care for.

From the points that I have mentioned above, it is clear that the best team does not win the competition. Such a badly organize competition with the poorest format (direct semis + based on aggregate scores) in the country does not deserve to be in Tier 4 in any case. The moot should be shifted down to Tier 5. The only reason I'm even suggesting that the moot be retained is because it has been happening for a few years now, else I think it deserves to be removed from the system altogether.

Regards
Bishen Jeswant
4th year, NLIU
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 16:47
+0 -0
is SOEL the same as ambedkar law college?
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 20:23
+0 -0
Dear Kian,

The oxford media law moot court competition is happening in two phases this year, one is the India round which is being held in NLU Delhi from december 11-13 2010. The other is the international rounds which will be held in oxford in march 2011. The top 4 teams will qualify from the India round to the international round. The organizers have kept a cap of 30 teams for the India round.

As per the list of moots Oxford media law moot is rated as a tier three moot. I think that should be the international round and the India round should be a tier 4 moot.

Regards
Aditya
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 20:53
+0 -0
Dude, i feel its okay if hk and vienna are on the same tier...
even though many asian teams are known to participate in hk, the competition is quite tough. if any indian team does anything significant in both vis hk and vis vienna, they ought to get good recognition under tier 1
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 20:54
+0 -0
I have heard amity moot had good judging. Much better than most other tier 5 moots.
Anonymous guest 21 Sept 2010, 20:57
+0 -0
Surprising to see so many new colleges like cusat, seedling, etc perform well.

Moving IICLAM and Amity to tier 4 is a good move. I guess the tiers are just around perfect right now. Get the tables coming along.
prakhar 22 Sept 2010, 03:02
+0 -0
i havnt got a valid answer why manfreds is in tier 4..
Anonymous guest 22 Sept 2010, 06:36
+0 -0
@5 [...] get over it, and move on!!!
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 05:37
+0 -0
i think LI has got it almost right now... i guess its time LI gets everything set soon and the MPL is under way... all the best


4th year NLIU
Anonymous guest 25 Sept 2010, 23:57
+0 -0
manfred still in not tier 3 .... gawd
Anonymous guest 26 Sept 2010, 23:02
+0 -0
SOEl- School of excellence in law, it is part of the Tamil nadu Dr Ambedkar law university, Chennai. SOEL was 5 overall in MPL. This year they already had 3 wins. Surana surana international minority law moot, Surana Surana Trial advocacy moot(runner up, best speaker, 2nd best speaker, and sprit of surana) south india rounds and Christ college moot court competition.
Anonymous guest 27 Sept 2010, 00:26
+0 -0
@15: surana moots are a sham, everyone knows this. that fact that one obscure college has won so many surana moots by defeating well-known NLUs is highly suspicious.
Anonymous guest 27 Sept 2010, 01:47
+0 -0
SOEL won many prestigious moots. Probably surana surana moots are a sham but NLUs are not. "If NLUs win they deserve it and if Non nlu's win u suspect a foul play?". Mooting is serious business. Things cant be manipulated in moots. The people who judge the woot will be the present sitting judges of various high courts and supreme courts. Dont u think they have a better job to do rather than come all the way and fix a moot court competition? Many think that moots can be fixed but it not true the judges are not dunp to listen to what the organisor(Suran & Surana) say.
Anonymous guest 4 Oct 2010, 14:00
+0 -0
Surana and Surana moots are definitely not fixed. Very transparent system. If the NLUs didn't win it is because they didn't deserve it. Coming from a big law school is not enough to be guaranteed a win. They need to prove that they are worth that much hype.