Breaking up, moving on / Issue 81

| ||

From today Indian law firms will have to get used to AZB being officially single again, Legally India can reveal. Clifford Chance and AZB broke off their best friendship late last night, which means that global CC rivals will again be more comfortable approaching AZB with referrals. “I don’t think there is any single international firm out there which has the ability to sustain any firm like ours [in terms of referrals],” one AZB lawyer summed up eloquently last week. There is no doubt that many of the global law majors, partially excluding the ones with their own local tie-ups, will again flock to what was once one of their favourite Indian firms before it went effectively monogamous in January 2009. But much has happened in those two years. Although AZB is still a market leader in areas such as M&A and is growing at a healthy rate, the firm’s bottom line has undoubtedly been hit by the decrease in global referrals. Meanwhile AZB’s rivals have not stood still and many have benefited from improved visibility and ties with foreign independents. Not to say there have been no benefits. AZB did take advantage of CC training and knowledge management infrastructure. And strong across-the-board ties with partners one of the world’s top banking firms will not hurt when the global finance markets do recover although in recent times it would have been of more limited use. Clifford Chance arguably emerges even stronger out of the tie-up. Apart from the individual relationships built - which could yet result in an eventual AZB-CC merger if the market does liberalise, however unlikely the prospect presently is – CC does now have the foot in the door of many of India’s top corporates, which should help it catch up with a few other foreign firms that have so far been ahead in some legs of the India-race. To assume that this break-up will sound a knell for the other Indian best friendships is premature – the AZB/CC relationship was always atypical because of the size of the parties. But it is safe to say that in the last two years the appetite for any further experiments and novel tie-ups has decreased markedly. Another strong rumour this week proved less solid. Newspapers and media went into a tizzy on Tuesday that law minister Veerappa Moily could be shunted out of the law ministry to another cabinet post. It was not to be. And a good thing too, although Moily was partly to blame for the AZB/CC break-up, having come into power with the ink still drying on the AZB/CC friendship agreement. If previous law minister HR Bhardwaj had stayed in power, AZB and/or Clifford Chance might by now have been known as Clifford Mody & Partners LLP. Perhaps. Bygones notwithstanding, Moily’s reform plans are ambitious and necessary, if at the moment still mostly theoretical. A change at the top of the law ministry now would do nothing but hamper legal reform. While the AZB/CC-related rumour mill was in overdrive over the past two weeks, other significant events transpired too. Young but dynamic start-up RDA Legal has renamed itself to PXV, launched a Mumbai office and hired three laterals into its lockstep. Plus, it held what could very well have been the first documented democratic managing partner election in Indian law firm history. And Luthra & Luthra celebrates two victories. The firm finally secured new office space in Mumbai, making it the most recent in a long line to flee South Mumbai to Parel and giving it the much-needed ability to expand in the financial hub. Luthra & Luthra also played to its traditional strength in project finance, topping the 2010 project finance league tables by a country mile. All things considered, however, perhaps the biggest winners this week were Titus & Co, who lifted the Turf-SILF T20 Cricket Cup for Law Firms after a gruelling competition that began last year. | At the bar and bench | | - Black money PIL: Government ‘dilly-dallies’, won’t do anything, says Divan - BCI should step in to investigate for-sale bar council elections, says Chennai lawyer - NLU Delhi now MPL 4th: Finishes 2nd in KK Luthra ahead of NLSIU but beaten by Yanks | | Deals of the week | |---| | - JSA, Wadia Ghandy structure $5m private equity cash into auto parts - Twobirds, JSA tie-up EU online food biz with Bangaloreans - Majmudar for Reliance, Dua for GE in JSA clean energy client investment - Khaitan & Co advises UAE bank on English-law outsourcing to WNS | | Top blogs of the week | |---| | - “What?? There is no hoopla at all!!!!” in notsolegal’s blog - ToI Report Lambasts NLSIU: Inaccurate, Cursory Reporting; Link to Reservation’ Demands in LegalPoet’s blog - Reality of Indian Legal System! in jpseehra’s blog - Jessica. Basanti. What’s happening after that??? in notsolegal’s blog - Right of Dr. Talwar to CBI closure reports… Aarushi Murder Case. in suchita.shah’s blog - The Sabarimala Stampede mishap, Kerela… 14th January 2011. in suchita.shah’s blog - The Times of India has lowered quality, says committee in vipulnanda’s blog |

To get future newsletters straight to your inbox every Friday for free, please enter your name and email below.

Comments

Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 04:20
+0 -0
A sad day. It is not a coincidence that this has happened after confirmation that a pro-reform person will not get the law ministry and the country is stuck with Moily till 2014. The tie up happened at a time when HR Bhardwaj had said he was in favour of foreign law firms. Then Moily the Great came and mysteriously reversed the stand. Moily has not carried out any reforms and has openly defended KGB, A Raja etc.
Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 15:06
+0 -0
Agree with #1. The attribution of even theoretical plans pending execution to Moily in cannot be accepted. In a polity today marred by systemic corruption in Congress-led governments, an even otherwise slumbering Moily can be least expected to do anything. The sad part is, AMSS will wear a smirk after all this.
kianganz 22 Jan 2011, 20:36
+0 -0
Dear All - comments are not working well at the moment in certain browser. If you find that the rotating arrow animation keeps continuing when you press post but no orange confirmation box comes up, please try to refresh the page and then repost. Otherwise, please post the comment in the Quick Message box in the left hand column of the page and we will post your comment for you.

We are currently investigating the issue and hope to have it fixed soon.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Best regards,
Kian
Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 22:38
+0 -0
Surely people saying good things about vision of Cyril and Shardul are correct to the extent that they did not enter into a similar deal with CC or anyone else in 2008, but to give AZB their due, Zia had more courage to enter into a deal and then even more courage to call it off when it did not fir with her plans. Full marks to her. She is better off with her experiences from this deal. Her people are better off by the exposure they got to one of the best firms in the world and the friends made there.

AMSS did not try not so much because of vision but because that would have meant the succession to children being put into question. Not for a moment did AZB put the interests of their children over and above doing a deal. Zia deserves the credit for having done this deal in the first place and then calling it off.

CC should have either found a smaller partner or set up its own captive in India and considering that CC was the single biggest employer of Indian lawyers in UK, this would not have been difficult to achieve. Now watch the space!
Anonymous guest 23 Jan 2011, 02:39
+0 -1
Agree with #2. Not just legal services but the Congress crooks are not implementing reforms in any sector: retail, agriculture, manufacturing etc. Our country is being run by a scam-tainted foreign lady dictator who never even went to college. The economy is ****ed up right now. On the other hand NDA leaders like Modi and Nitish have been doing so well.

I just hope the UPA is voted out in 2014. If not it is better to migrate to Pakistan.
Anonymous guest 25 Jan 2011, 05:55
+0 -0
Folks lets get rid of the hyperbole here (read- you number 5). Speaking as a foreign lawyer, I echo the opinion of some here that it certainly was courageous of AZB to tie up with CC (as well as to cut the cord when they did not see it fitting into future plans-for whatever reason). Look this is an evolving issue and speaks to the dynamism of India in general. My two cents-Indian law firms need to continue to become professional firms and continue to move away from "family run businesses". With that and greater experience handling large scale transactions, India firms will be well positioned to handle any transaction that comes their way. Remember this is a nascent space (at least as it relates to transactional law) and there will be ups and downs along the way. I do feel for some of the younger associates and their need for upward mobility. However, I don't know if the grievances of these associates will be automatically resolved by foreign law firms coming in to the fray. I think you are seeing movement of more experienced lawyers to new firms which means firms are recognizing that there is talent on the benches beyond just the "founders". If this continues, all "boats must rise".

I watch admiringly and interested from afar.