Special Issue 7: It’s official, the BCI was/is c****** (+ scoops on Luthra promos, Cyril move & a best friend's expansion)

BCI under pressure (though certainly not from the media)
BCI under pressure (though certainly not from the media)
”)

If you believe those Supreme Court judges who say that the CBI is a caged parrot, then it might be fair to also assume that the Modi regime does not have much love lost for the Bar Council of India (BCI).

Neither did special judge Anju Bajaj Chandna, who held beyond reasonable doubt that three current and former senior Bar Council of India (BCI) members had “been seeking bribe from old and new colleges as a matter of right.

The demand in form is nothing but extortion and also amounts to professional misconduct,” she said…

But scariest / saddest thing in all this should perhaps be that not a single newspaper or website (other than LI), has so far picked up the story, despite a massive press release about the jail terms (also uploaded on the CBI’s website) and the Press Trust of India having carried the story some time last evening.

The above are censored and selected excerpts from our weekly premium-subscribers-only newsletter, which includes more frank words and some interesting scoops on Luthra & Luthra, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, and a foreign law firm best friend.

Please subscribe below to support us in more exclusive coverage and analysis of the profession that other publications, for unfathomable reasons, aren’t even trying to touch.

Comments

Guest 19 Jul 2016, 13:01
+1 -0
Possible reasons why MSM highlights medical council college recognition scam (and MCI was abolished) but ignores BCI:

1. Media wants to protect the powerful. Even Bar & Bench has censored it (the ultimate suck-up website).

2. Media does not see legal education as important (unlike medical colleges) and even we as a nation don't care (look at GLC, DU: law degrees without attendance!)
kianganz 19 Jul 2016, 14:38
+1 -0
B&B has now covered it, a little while after this post was published.

Don't think anyone else has though.

I agree with your analysis.

I think one large part is also that editors are afraid that if they write about the BCI, they might get sued by the lawyers there.

And yes, medical colleges are a far bigger audience than law schools for newspapers.

Nevertheless, they all report about law schools, judicial reform, pendency, protesting and striking lawyers, and so many more things, yet they usually seem to stop shy just before the BCI...