CLAT postponed indefinitely until further notice • Sept date mooted but no commitment made [UPDATE-3]

Exclusive: CLAT now unlikely to be held any time soon*

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2020 has been postponed indefinitely for now, according to a notification by the committee, an early copy of which we have seen.

Update 21:30: Unlike the draft copy that we had published earlier, the official notification does not commit to announcing a new date by 1 September but literally postpones the CLAT indefinitely “until further notice”. While we understand that mid-September had been discussed in the meeting as a potential and tentative date, in light of the unpredictable and constantly developing Covid-19 situation and lockdowns, it seems reasonable that the consortium did not want to formally announce or commit to that.

As we had reported on Monday, the CLAT consortium’s committee of national law university (NLU) vice chancellors (VC) had held a meeting today to decide the fate of the 22 August test, against a backdrop of lockdowns in several states and a central government order prima facie preventing mass academic gatherings.

Several NLUs’ VCs, for instance, had expressed concerns about lockdowns in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, scheduled for the entire month, and several VCs we had spoken to over the past weeks had repeatedly stressed that the safety of candidates should come first.

The postponement will be a relief to those aspirants who may have had concerns about braving a physical exam centre in the midst of a pandemic.

On the other hand, some other candidates may have wanted to just get the exam, which they may have long prepared for, over with.

For the NLUs themselves, the delay will also be a major concern: most would have been hoping (Covid notwithstanding) to begin the new semester for freshers in early September 2020.

That is now all but impossible on the current roadmap.

Notification
Notification

Update 21:15: The official website and social media channels have now been updated with the announcement above, which is slightly different from the draft announcement we had published earlier.

Notably, it does not commit to announce any date in September anymore but actually postpones it indefinitely “until further notice”.

Update 23:40: The above notification seems to now have been removed from social media channels and the website of the CLAT. We will update this article when we hear anything.

Update 23:53: The website has been updated, noting that registrations have closed and that the exam has been “postponed until further notice”. Telegram and other social media channels have not yet been re-updated.

The older, superseded draft announcement

Early draft announcement
Early draft announcement

Comments

What?? 5 Aug 2020, 12:28
+23 -1
Good decision.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 12:29
+12 -0
how did legallyindia get the press release even though it is not released on the official website till now
LI 5 Aug 2020, 14:06
+22 -2
Simple: they infiltrated Sudhir's kitchen.


Let's be honest, that's where Sudhir was during the meeting.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 14:45
+8 -1
The poor chap is indeed in a pressure-cooker situation, so to speak.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 16:29
+1 -5
LI has been unethically leaking all sorts of internal documents.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 13:52
+4 -0
Kian your website was done for few minutes and it was showing access denied.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 13:58
+10 -3
is this true? why hasn't there been a press release notif on the consortium website?
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 14:46
+2 -0
True enough. Just spoke with one of the VCs from the South. They will get around to updating the website soon enough.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 15:31
+1 -1
It's now getting rough and tough as far as the clat exam is heading
Chill 5 Aug 2020, 15:55
+24 -2
Clat is nothing ! The whole world is on standby. Chill for another six months and let your family survive.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 15:56
+12 -41
I'm sorry, but at this point, I would rather have COVID than delay the exams further.
Appearing for Clat 5 Aug 2020, 16:12
+2 -9
Wouldn't you rather have the clat at home?
But ? 5 Aug 2020, 16:22
+3 -6
You may want to. But, think of others ?

"Place others above you" is a mantra a law student should be prepared digest. If he cannot, its time he reconsidered his idea for being a lawyer.
What the? 5 Aug 2020, 18:04
+7 -1
You might want to Sir, but not others. We've no interest in infecting ourselves with a disease which has the potential to kill us. I know the delay is frustrating, but getting Covid is painful. Keep studying, you'll get your chance whenever it is meant to happen.
common lawguy 5 Aug 2020, 16:15
+2 -1
Don't know why Legally India though the earlier notice to be true since it's formatting is off (5th August 2020 should be in the right side but 2020 comes in the middle) and has a few grammatical mistakes.

It would have been much better if consortium would have given a date and ended any kind of ambiguity.
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 16:27
+6 -16
I have been saying from day 1 that this had to happen. Nothing can be done because India will soon be #1 in Covid cases. It is a war-like situation. Sorry batch of 2020, but you will have to lose a year.
Yes 6 Aug 2020, 05:44
+3 -7
What's the harm if we shut everything down till covid ends? Even if it takes 3 years
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 16:30
+8 -1
Kian, why no reports on LSAT cheating?
Guest is Stupid 6 Aug 2020, 07:28
+2 -5
Do you've any evidence? Do you realise it's utterly dumb to cheat in LSAT because of the kind of paper it is? Attack LSAT trolls all you want but stop manufacturing stories and if you've evidence, put it on a public forum.
Not an LSAT troll but 6 Aug 2020, 07:34
+5 -0
I genuinely think the CLAT consortium has somehow lost the plot. They had been fairly good in keeping us updated through July, been quite interactive on social media platforms. Suddenly they decided to delete all comments on Insta and disable the forum. The current postponement is also the worst of all the announcements simply because of the botched roll out. First they put out the press release, then withdrew it and only those who go into the website get the postponement announcement. Secondly, they also didn't specify an advance notice timeline. I understand that it's difficult to give an assurance that we'll announce by so and so date when exam is and an indefinite postponement makes sense but at least assure students that you'll give them a 10-15 day notice, like AILET did. It's disappointing to see this.
David Ignatius 5 Aug 2020, 17:49
+2 -27
The problem with most people is that they don’t understand the reality till it kicks them hard. I have been writing in these pages that every NLU should have decided what Jindal decided nearly 3 months ago. Everything that is innovative, creative, imaginative, farsighted and indeed relevant is being done by Jindal. Even if NLUs can’t do it on their own, the least they can do is to just follow Jindal. LSAT-India went fantastically well, contrary to what some people believe.
There is a reason why it went well. Because LSAC is a very old and reputed organisation. LSAT, GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT are very seasoned tests conducted by world renowned testing organisations. They have just mastered it over half a century.
What I pity today is that the CLAT aspirants may lose an entire year. Unless CLAT decides to request LSAC to help them, there is no way an entrance exam of the kind the CLAT consortium wanted can happen. This is obstinancy of the highest order which NLUs could have avoided.
What is strange to me is that I don’t live in India and left India 3 decades ago and I worry that nothing much has changed in a large part. I wish NLUs had read this article that was published 75 days when the authors gave a road map for Indian legal education to follow during this pandemic:

https://www.livelaw.in/columns/why-indian-law-schools-need-to-adopt-the-online-law-entrance-exam-in-2020-the-re-imagination-of-the-law-school-admissions-process-156967
Lolok 5 Aug 2020, 18:07
+27 -1
Just chill with the PR
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 18:31
+9 -1
Since you don't live in india, then you should stop worrying so much about our students, unless you are worried that unless they get themselves admitted en mass in Jindal, your troll tax won't be paid by the latter. So much worrying is bad for the stress level [...].
Hunter 6 Aug 2020, 08:22
+7 -0
You want CLAT to be conducted like LSAT. Your argument is just baseless. Reasons:
1)- LSAT is taken by 5-6k students. On the other hand more than 60k students write CLAT
2)- LSAT is taken by well to do students (considering that they are targeting OP Jindal). They can easily get the required infrastructure to take the test. In case of CLAT, students from all types of backgrounds appear for it and most of them can't afford a Laptop and a WiFi connection.

India is still captured in the shackles of poverty. We know the scenario better than you know. So, it would be better if you stop comparing the two exams, for the simple reason that they cannot be compared.
Jackal 7 Aug 2020, 13:20
+1 -0
Left India 3 decades ago- hence assuming you must be in your 40s/50s now, if not older. Isn't it time you reconsidered your priorities? [...] than trolling on Indian legal websites at an article meant for 18 year olds? [...]
Guest 5 Aug 2020, 18:25
+12 -0
The comsortium deleted the notice , it is being so undeicise that is giving me anxieties
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 02:57
+1 -14
I had said many times that an online proctored exam like JGLS is the best solution. The objections regarding access are stupid and meaningless as 99.9%. of those giving the exam have a computer at home. Time to do that now.
Guest123 6 Aug 2020, 03:33
+8 -0
Online proctored exam sounds cool and nice but reality is not always what it seems like. The amount of cheating during these exams is uncontrollable(as seen in slat). A student even posted a video on youtube as a cheating guide for other students who were earlier thinking to write exam with honesty. The online protored exams have catastrophic effects not only on students who have worked hard for years but also on trust that exams will give equal opportunity to all. Now I think we should commend consortium for their efforts and wait till the pandemic is in control so a center based exams can be conducted.
Views expressed are personal
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 04:44
+5 -1
Is that why half the applicants for JGLS withdrew from the process after the online exams were announced?
lsat taker 6 Aug 2020, 06:26
+0 -0
this is wrong info.
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 07:31
+4 -0
LSAT rep said so himself. Are we supposed to take your word over his?
Jindalkedalal 6 Aug 2020, 06:04
+5 -0
Take a day off! How hard you work! Do they not allow you holidays :(
lsat taker 6 Aug 2020, 06:24
+4 -3
I took lsat exam on 19 july. it was superb. no cheating possible. all reasoning and comprehension questions. why not clat following same pattern? how many times they will postpone..it seems clat can't happen this year.
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 07:32
+11 -0
If you are happy with it, why even bother about CLAT? Go to superb Jindal and be merry, no?
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 06:52
+4 -5
No vaccine, no CLAT. Simple.
Guest 6 Aug 2020, 12:00
+3 -0
LegallyIndia thanks for the update but please put the newest updates on the top not in the middle because it gets confusing which is the latest and maybe add 12 hour format for time too.
Guest 7 Aug 2020, 07:31
+0 -0
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/coronavirus-seniors-may-be-back-in-school-on-september-1-others-to-follow/articleshow/77405025.cms
Guest 7 Aug 2020, 08:43
+1 -0
India has now crossed 2 million cases. Yet the bhakts are down voting comments here saying that Covid is a huge crisis in India.
Guest 7 Aug 2020, 08:45
+1 -2
Write it down: No CLAT this year.
Guest 7 Aug 2020, 08:47
+1 -0
LI is not properly covering the job crisis in the current graduating batches.
Guest 7 Aug 2020, 11:03
+1 -0
Thankyou for your sincere updates :)
Disappointed 7 Aug 2020, 16:36
+1 -0
Kian, please expose LSAT india and it's online proctored test. I do not understand why you have not picked up on stories that have detailed instances of cheating. Is it because you are on LSAT/Jindal's payroll?
Guest 8 Aug 2020, 02:03
+4 -1
Jindal people are now going all out in social media denouncing CLAT and saying online remote exams are the only way to go. They even have the temerity to claim that all CLAT aspirants must have access to internet and computer and necessary skills, and are using anecdotal evidence to establish the truth of this ridiculous claim, all the while having no clue of the real world. Especially the claims made by their PR guy, who has written here too, [Ed: please share link to FB post] (Kian, no need to censor this post, he has actually written all of that on his Facebook page and you can check it). His logic is that paying 4000 for the exam means you are rich enough to have all such access and privilege, which is laughable at best and reveals his own ignorance and privilege. How someone can make claims about 60000 people after having tested merely 5000 belonging to an exclusive group is beyond reason. I don't have any issue with Jindal people bragging about their institute or their exam. But they are not in a position to make claims about CLAT at least. I won't be surprised if the troll David Ignatius who has been ranting all over the comments section also turns out to be a Jindal guy specially paid to do so.
Guest 8 Aug 2020, 06:05
+0 -0
@Kian: Since you asked for the link.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10158599419919525&id=614724524