Head-to-head: CLAT on 22 August via centre-based computer test • NLU-D’s AILET to go online proctored on 18th

Diverging approaches as the CLAT will play it more old-school with an in-person test while the smaller AILET emulates LSAT model with online proctored exam.*

CLAT centre 2020 (artist impression)
CLAT centre 2020 (artist impression)

The 2020 Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) will be held via a computer-based test at physical test centres on Saturday 22 August 2020, the CLAT consortium has announced, while NLU Delhi has decided (see below) to hold its competing All India Law Entrance Test (AILET) on 18 August, entirely online via so-called “remote proctoring” (read this for more information on what remote proctoring could look like).

The national law universities’ consortium had met yesterday, on 29 June, and grappled with the logistics of a Covid-19 exam, deciding both against holding a traditional off-line test as well as against holding an entirely online exam (such as that envisaged by JGLS and the LSAT-India, and now NLU Delhi):

It concluded that an off-line test, as initially contemplated, would require large scale movement of students to limited centres, and significant logistics in the handling of question papers and answer scripts, which is not possible during the prevalent pandemic conditions.

Further, an on-line test at home with technological measures cannot ensure transparency, fairness and integrity of a high stakes examination process or maintain equitable access to necessary facilities.

Hence, the EC concluded that an on-line test at a large number of centres compliant with physical distancing and public health safety prescriptions is in the best interests of the health and safety of candidates and test administrators.

The CLAT date - which had previously been announced to be communicated before 1 July - has therefore been pushed again to 22 August.

The exam would be held in person at test centres (to be notified by 1 July) but via “computer-based, online” tests, which presumably means that each candidate would get access to a workstation at the test centre.

The application deadline has been extended to 10 July, with candidates also able to apply for application fee refunds (after a deduction of Rs 500, and Rs 400 for SC/ST candidates).

CLAT 2020 new plan
CLAT 2020 new plan

Trying for a healthy CLAT

Furthermore, the consortium has issued guidance for safe “social distanced computer based testing” (see PDF below for more details), which includes:

  • crowd management staff for “orderly movement”, as well as “sufficient cleaning staff” and others to help,
  • temperature measuring guns, sanitised exam centres, and availability of hand sanitiser and soap in centres.

If any unfortunate candidates should develop a temperature or other Covid-19 symptoms on the day of the exam (which is basically defined as a temperature of more than 99.14 degrees Fahrenheit), they won’t be allowed to take the test in the main exam venue but apparently a “separate isolation lab will be set up to accommodate these candidates”.

NLU Delhi AILET to go for remote proctoring online exam on 18 August

By contrast, NLU Delhi has received permission from the National Testing Agency (NTA) to hold its separate admissions test as a “remote proctored test (RPT)“, according to an announcement on its website (which also reversed the 50% Delhi reservations, following yesterday’s Delhi high court order).

The notification fixed 18 August 2020 as the exam date, noting:

Now the AILET 2020 will be conducted on August 18, 2020 from 11.00 to 12.30 Hrs (90 mts) on RPT mode. Before the test, the NTA will provide the detailed information and guidance to the aspirants for which two webinars & one mock test for the AILET 2020 will be conducted by NTA.

The schedule of the webinars & mock test will be notified shortly. In view of the change in the reservation policy & seat matrix as per orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and further change in the mode of test from pen and paper test to RPT mode, the University has decided to allow the option of withdrawal to the candidates, who want to withdraw their application for admission to B.A.LL.B.(Hons), LL.M. and Ph.D. Programmes.

[documentcloud http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6960596-Notification-for-Conduct-of-CLAT-2020.html CLAT 2020 Notification of mode of conduct and 22 August exam date][documentcloud http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6960610-NLU-Delhi-Revised-Admission-Notification-July-2020.html NLU Delhi AILET notification of 18 August exam date][documentcloud http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6960597-Medical-Precautions-CLAT-2020.html CLAT 2020 medical precautions] First photo by Michael Surran

Comments

Guest 30 Jun 2020, 11:20
+4 -26
[i]This is exactly what Jindal decided to do 3 months ago. Even this one will not work and CLAT will get postponed further. COVID-19 situation will not allow this type of exam to happen and ultimately, CLAT will have to go back to the Jindal model - 100% Online, AI-Enabled, Remote-Proctored. This is what IITs have begun to do. NLUs will have to make CLAT exactly like Jindal and then they will be able to have the CLAT. Jindal will once again provide leadership to all NLUs and all universities in India, whether it is about hiring outstanding faculty (600 plus full time faculty in the university and JGLS alone has 350 full time faculty), pursuing research (3000 publications in 11 years including 150 books), building international collaborations with the world's best universities (including Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Oxford, Cambridge and 250 other universities in 55 countries) using technology-enabled learning, online degrees (LLM in Corporate & Financial Law & MBA in Digital Finance & Banking), blended learning, online exams - just name anything and you will see, every NLU and every university in India is just following or aspiring to follow what Jindal began to do 10 years ago. Jindal is the the gold standard and a world class model of Indian higher education.[/i]
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 12:06
+21 -0
3000 publications in 11 years comes to a little bit less than 300 per year, which when divided between 600 plus faculty, comes to less than 1 publication per year by every faculty. That's what you wrote, not me.
Bijnes 1 Jul 2020, 10:00
+3 -0
OP is an idiot and is clearly JGU PR staff but so are you. 3000/11 = 300 publication per year is ok but equating that to 600 faculty is idiotic because the 600 faculty count is in year 2020 and not from day one. There were around 60 kids in first batch so even if JGLS had like 5-6 faculty they still had 1:10 ratio.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 11:54
+0 -1
So reveal the year-wise publication and year-wise faculty strength and then let people comment on that. Simple. It is absolutely misleading to claim that all the 600 plus current faculty at Jindal are regularly publishing quality papers or doing relevant research. I've met some of them and frankly, they were underwhelming at best. Some on the other hand were quite good. At best 10% would be doing regular quality research if that.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 11:41
+3 -16
Ridiculous idea by CLAT! Moreover Covid will peak in India at the time! Stop this mad obsession about access and do what JGLS and NLUD are doing! EVERYONE has a computer at home.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 12:06
+21 -0
Start a fund to buy one to everyone who doesn't, and I'll happily agree with your model.
Bijnes 1 Jul 2020, 10:01
+0 -3
I will fund it as long as you are willing to fund the cost to train them to use computers. This online test is inevitable too, it's just that your privileged ass can't be bothered with it.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 11:55
+2 -0
Nope, all the funding has to come from you or anyone who claims students in general in this country would have no problem giving an online exam. After all, if your claim is true, you won't need to provide any funding at all!
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 12:09
+14 -0
No. Everyone doesn't. Shouting that in all caps won't make it true.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 11:48
+4 -4
Ranbir Singh finally bit the bullet and copied Jindal. Yet, the CLAT VCs refuse to do so as they are full of pride and never want to admit that Jindal is right. Well guess what you fools, India will cross millions of cases by August and be in a war-like situation until December.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 12:07
+7 -2
If it is going to be a war-like situation, why would one want to spend lakhs a year to get room service from Goldman Sachs?
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 11:49
+5 -22
Why is clat taking place in August!! All the Clat aspirants should sign a petition asking the nlus to take admissions on the basis of the 12th board marks. There is no benefit in taking the clat exam in August.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 12:09
+8 -1
Start a petition.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 11:54
+14 -0
Unlike LSAT, AILET will be a cheater's haven because the questions will not be randomised. Be prepared for an invasion of junior crooks and criminals at NLUD!!
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 14:14
+9 -1
And more litigation? Faculty filing cases against admin, admin filing complaints against students, non-teaching staff filing claims against admin, now aspirants filing suits against the university. What fun! That's how a law university should be, providing steady income for lawyers.
Geoff 30 Jun 2020, 16:35
+1 -8
1.1 is so juvenile. Little does this person know that in 2009 when Jindal started, they had only 22 faculty members. And progressively, as there were more students, they ended up recruiting more faculty members and now have a globally enviable 1:9 faculty-student ration. But the irony is this person doesn’t even know that the 600 faculty members is today’s data and not what it was for the last 10 years. Kian - You need to educate your readers. By adopting a simplistic Jindal-bashing model, they are not only exposing their ignorance but are also dumbing down the discourse. Jindal is no comparison to any law school in South Asia and that’s why they are ranked Number 1 in India and South Asia In the world’s most reputed rankings organisation, QS. That’s not even the big point here. Nobody can match with Jindal in terms of vision, mission, imagination, and implementation - Jindal Global Law School alone has more 350 full time faculty members with more than 50 graduates from Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, King’s College, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Berkeley, and Columbia law schools. NLS Bangalore’s recruitment of 10 faculty members is celebrated as if martians have landed! But the reality is that these are best half hearted attempts which are best a mild pimple in the world of Indian legal education. Let’s not be in any fool’s paradise. Jindal is already top 101-150 law schools in the world. It will be very soon overtaking all major law schools in Asia including NUS in Singapore. There is no law school in China, Japan, Hong Kong. South Korea, Taiwan which is any serious match to Jindal. Let all of us at NLUs try to introspect why we are like this and what we can do to become better. What can we learn and emulate from Jindal. What an extraordinary marvel of accomplishments that Jindal has had just in one decade!
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 17:25
+5 -0
Actually, 1.1 just stated what 1 had adulated. You are carrying on the same note it seems. If you talk about publications over 11 years, you should give better data. As for your adulation, I'm yet to see the output. For all the vaunted faculty quality of Jindal (strangely, we only get to hear about most in Jindal PR), their students overall are no match for the top NLUs. In any field. Of course, there are several Jindal students who are just as good, but they are a minority at best. Simply shouting that you are the best doesn't make you so. At the end of the day, people still consider any institution's quality by the graduates that it produces. And the Jindal fee model along with the huge batch size and very little screening during admission collectively ensure that they would remain behind the minuscule NLUs with a fraction of its resources. It is really as simple as that. And please stop posing as if every one of those 350 faculty members are quality teachers. They are not. I have met many. There are of course good people too.
Lol 1 Jul 2020, 11:42
+1 -0
Well even QS who the admin are so quick to flaunt everywhere else has ranked 11 Asian universities above Jindal, I fail to see how no university compares to it. Also, I'm a Jindal student as well. Every section still has a minimum of 60 students, some even have more, and classes have to be shifted to seminar halls or near the flagpole because there's no room in the classrooms. Any my batch has 5 sections of only BA LLB, plus two more of BBA LLB. I can count the number of good professors we've had with one hand. This 9-1 ratio and claims of star faculty is more bogus than anything, considering the huge class size and number of faculty. Honestly, peddling your lies to students who read the LL comments and who decide to consider Jindal as an option is just ruining their lives.
wut 11 Jul 2020, 02:36
+0 -0
That just sounds like a load of BS.

No class has 60+ students.

No current batch of Jindal is limited to 5 sections of BA LLB + 2 sections of BBA LLB. They are all out at 5 sections EACH.

You're clearly not a Jindal student bruv.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 16:02
+11 -6
Why can't we just stop everything for this year? Everything can resume from next year. Losing one year really doesn't matter so much. Stop this madness.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 17:18
+3 -0
For universities dependent on student fees for the most part, that would mean a loss of several crores over the next five years.
guest301 1 Jul 2020, 08:10
+7 -0
here's a thing-
this one year drop might not matter to students who cleared 12th this year.. but will matter a lot to droppers like me who have been preparing for clat and ailet
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 16:06
+2 -0
Expect LSAT to further postpone as a majority of students keep jindal as backup. No one will give lakhs of admission fees than give Ailet and Nlu
Jindal izz best 1 Jul 2020, 05:18
+4 -0
Let's be honest about Jindal. The only reason why Jindal can pay it's professors so well is because of the number of students it intakes. If every batch has 500 kids and every kid pays up to 40 lakh a year, of course the university can hire the best of faculty. Reason as to why Jindal can never compete with NLUs is the student quality. Does that mean that a top student at Jindal is any less than a top student at the top 3 NLU, no but when you compare the batch in general the NLUs take the win. With any argument with Jindal the numbers matter which the Jindal PR machinery wants you to forget.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 09:42
+0 -0
@8: Jindal PR would also keep dropping tantalising hints about those scholarships, but you would not find any available record in the public domain about how many students from any batch are being given scholarships, what's the amount and how much they are paying after the scholarships. Had those stats revealed anything good, the PR machinery would have desperately semaphored them if possible!
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 10:16
+0 -1
Balraj Chauhan must resign. He has set an impossible target and will eventually have to shift to the LSAT/AILET model, but by then it will too late.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 11:56
+3 -0
The privileged cheating model you mean.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 10:18
+0 -3
Having a regular CLAT will be MORE ELITIST than an online proctored CLAT. Because of Covid, only a few centres in big cities will be ready. On the other hand, an online protrude CLAT means students in small towns can give the exam.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 13:25
+4 -0
Why is NLUD allowed to conduct its own exam?

The whole point of CLAT was to prevent students from having to pay fees to different institutions.

If NLUD is permitted, why does NLS or any other college have to go ahead with CLAT?
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 14:31
+0 -1
NLSIU and older NLUs are still bound by the SC order. Newer NLUs believe if they hold their own, so many students might not apply.
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 07:03
+4 -0
There was no order from SC to hold CLAT. In the course of proceedings the idea of a CAT-like process was floated and the Bench merely asked the MHRD, UGC and others to explore the idea. Had there been a clear direction that CLAT was the only way to gain entry into NLUs then NLUD couldn't have avoided it.

Later MHRD in an affidavit before the SC (I think it was in the case that Shamnad had initiated) clearly said that they had nothing to do with CLAT and that it was a private initiative by the participating NLUs. So, if any NLU that is part of the newly formed CLAT Consortium wishes to exit, it can. Similarly, if an NLU wants to stay away like NLUD, it can do that as well.

CLAT in a sense is perceived as being helpful by newer NLUs to not only get some revenue but also save on admin hassles relating to conducting admission tests on an all-India basis.
Guest 5 Jul 2020, 12:11
+0 -0
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.

The argument that it would save on admin hassle makes sense.
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 05:05
+4 -3
I wouldn't know about hostels in other NLUs. At NUJS, we have suffered Tihar like situation. After a big push by SJA (that was steadfastly opposed by Registrar since it would have resulted in the ejection of her acolytes from campus who had illegally stayed on) the infamous "tripling" ended. But the situation is far from satisfactory and I have no idea how NUJS is going to accommodate outstation students because the twin sharing rooms will not allow social distancing. Next the washrooms and we know their condition. The mess is, well, a mess.

I am sure NKC & Co will use this opportunity for "building construction" despite a blanket ban by the state govt as part of austerity measures. They will cite "emergency". "student demands" etc so that the "deal" moves forward. "Building construction" and related deals is the vehicle to traffic in IoUs. They will also try to revive other vehicle, distance education. So business as usual and that can only mean one thing - profits at the expense of students.

And in a state where this happens but gets reported rarely, horrors await students https://www.ndtv.com/kolkata-news/kolkata-family-forced-to-keep-mans-body-in-ice-cream-freezer-for-2-days-2255629?pfrom=home-bigstory

NUJS also has a poor record of investigating suicides transparently. Forget prevention.
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 06:04
+5 -5
You are not a student. Quit pretending to be one. You are an old troll whose writing style has by now become familiar in the comments section. If you were that unhappy on seeing the conditions of the hostel on the very first day, why didn't you leave and take admission elsewhere? Or did your parents realise that they have spoiled you crazy and a few years here would do you good? Ever ventured near Tihar in your life?
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 08:00
+4 -5
Are you denying that NUJS did not have tripling? And you were happy about it? That there were insufficient number of washrooms for the dorms in the girls' hostel? That dorm was never part of the original plan but had to be organised by converting the mess facility there? That the extra floors added to faculty accommodation could not stave off tripling? The only way tripling went away was even ND and SPS, acolytes of Registrar, were booted off campus by Lord Taluk under pressure from SJA. The aforementioned souls till then were lying that their service contract entitled them to campus accommodation but when asked by SJA (and by extension Lord Taluk) asked them to show the paperwork, they simply scooted. That ND with the help of Registrar tried (and may have succeeded) to get Rs 45K+ from the university for relocating two blocks away in a subsidized state govt housing complex.

Will you also deny that UGC allocated more than Rs 16 crores over a decade that included more than a crore for hostels alone and PIB and Co did nothing but allow embezzlement by a former Registrar and his cronies that includes ND. Read up the Justice PN Sinha Report. The Cal HC accepted that report and approved the firing of that Registrar.

Will you deny that NKC tried but couldn't avoid informing the EC that NUJS needs to return at least Rs 5 crores to UGC to avoid getting blacklisted. That the former AO was retained as a "consultant" on hefty remuneration to do "creative accounting" because the new AO declined to be involved with "whatever happened earlier". The new AO is already shaken by the fact that IT authorities froze NUJS accounts and were able to recover Rs 4 crores out of a demand of Rs 7.86 crores. The Calcutta HC is yet to issue any stay etc on this matter.

Do you deny all this? If yes, then you either don't know (go ahead and ask your great VC) or you are the troll who wants to suppress inconvenient facts

Kian, you can either censor or pursue the details that I mentioned here. Everyone knows. The faculty, both Injustice and Justice Leagues, was our source.
Guest 6 Jul 2020, 08:42
+4 -3
*yawn*
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 12:37
+5 -5
Maybe 12.1.1. is a troll. But s/he says here about UGC refunds, Justice PN Sinha Report and Income Tax authorities freezing NUJS accounts are all true. Quite a few of us heard it from a young faculty member. Maybe other faculty members have also "leaked".

Apparently, NKC also admitted before the EC that NUJS hasn't had BCI affiliation since 2011.

Kina, since there will be firefight whether all of this is motivated rumour mongering, why don't you ask your sources and talk to NKC and others to find out the real picture. Both current and prospective students need to know the truth because the charges are quite serious and in my case, the young faculty member, is a credible source.
Guest 6 Jul 2020, 06:45
+3 -5
Kian, you should follow up on the suggestion given by this commentator. Wouldn't know about the current students but prospective students will be greatly helped. Is NUJS administration hiding such matters? Please find out if NUJS really did not have BCI affiliation since 2011 (has that been sorted now, when and how? evidence of admin claim?); black listing threat by UGC (over and above NUJS' violations of UGC distance education rules) and the big refund to UGC (why, how and when?); apparently no NAAC accreditation (when many other NLUs that were established after NUJS have it, such as NLUD, RGNUL, NLUO etc) and the trouble with Income Tax authorities.
Guest 6 Jul 2020, 15:38
+3 -3
Nobody cares. Other than trolls here.
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 03:28
+2 -3
Never knew that exposing institutionalized corruption is akin to trolling. Maybe this is witch hunt https://www.telegraphindia.com/west-bengal/3-visva-bharati-university-professors-suspended/cid/1785448

Then again, something similar may happen at NUJS if the investigations are transparently done and not repeatedly diluted and stalled by NKC and his friends
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 03:55
+6 -2
*double yawn*
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 13:34
+2 -1
I see your yawn and raise it to three.
Guest 29 Jul 2020, 15:32
+1 -1
It should be postpone further from 22nd Aug due to covid