CLAT opens a grievance email address until Monday 5pm, going beyond letter of SC order

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) consortium has published a grievance redressal form on its website allowing candidates to raise grievances, if any, about the 2020 CLAT one final time.

Excerpt from grievance redressal form
Excerpt from grievance redressal form

The PDF form and instructions are available here.

In summary, the form and specific supporting evidence needs to be submitted to the email address described before 5pm Monday, 12 October 2020.

Some specific grievances are specifically exlcuded, such as, “not following instructions” (presumably with an eye on the mark for review issues).

The CLAT had confirmed that 4,839 individual candidates had made complaints (out of just over 50,000), though it had not confirmed how many of those had made objections based on technical issues.

Allowing all candidates a final attempt to make their complaints heard (perhaps in a more organised manner than before), goes beyond the written order of the Supreme Court (though orally there had been discussion of allowing all candidates to raise grievances).

As such, it is a good attempt to gather better data on exactly what kind of technical issues, if any, candidates faced in the exam.

But at the pace that the admissions process is going and with vice-chancellors (VC) having little patience to postponing admissions, it seems unlikely that anything in the rank or admissions list will still change.

As such, many candidates with grievances may also have moved on by now, and may not bother spending their time on printing and scanning or virtually completing and signing a PDF.

However, if the CLAT ever does conduct a post mortem, that data may prove useful.

Comments

Guest 11 Oct 2020, 13:53
+2 -0
acc to the instructions Do I have to sign every page of the response sheet ?
Guest 11 Oct 2020, 14:17
+7 -4
In the grevience redressal form there is no option of challenging questions and answer keys . We can only challenge technical issue and discrepancy in response sheet.also we can only raise one grevience
Guest 765 11 Oct 2020, 17:09
+4 -0
Hon'ble Supreme Court has allowed aspirants to file any kind of grievances to the Grevience redressal committee. So no restrictions as such.
Anon asp 12 Oct 2020, 05:54
+2 -0
they said there's no "option" whats so hard to understand about that, didnt face any tech glitch, just wrong options
Guest 11 Oct 2020, 15:15
+7 -0
Even I have to challege questions i still think some questions have 2 answers
Guest 765 11 Oct 2020, 17:14
+12 -4
Many aspirants who felt bad for not getting the marks they deserved have moved on to other courses and not interested in filing grevience applications. So number is likely to be in small numbers.
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 06:50
+4 -4
All the Sudhir Bhakts and trolls who were gleefully predicting that CLAT would be struck down are now silent. Supreme Court struck down NLAT, but allowed CLAT to go ahead with admissions. It is clear which exam has been better conducted legally and properly. The trolls who were all about how Messiah being a 'young NLU alum with foreign degree' must be more competent than all other VCs and all other institution have got a fitting reply. Only NLSIU lost some valuable reputation in the process of pandering to the megalomania of their VC.
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 07:21
+3 -3
I have zero faith in the SC. India is a banana republic where only the rich, corrupt and powerful get justice.
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 08:24
+2 -6
Then why are you in this profession?
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 10:26
+4 -0
One side admission are taking place and another side this grievance redressal. Many students lost hope. This is just like taking ticket after train left the station.this is just a drama to satisfy the ego of consortium. Every one know the result
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 10:44
+7 -1
How is this appeasing the ego of the consortium? It would prefer to exclusively focus on the admission and nothing else! If anything, you can say that this is paying lip service to the petitioner's plea.
Guest 0 12 Oct 2020, 12:02
+1 -2
All this is happening due to negligence of consortium. Why did they give wrong Answer key. Why didn't they rectify their mistake when objections were raised. How can Resilience not mean toughness. Why did they mark answer sheets with other than what was selected by the students. If they focus on admissions why did all this mess happen leaving large number of aspirants with a painful CLAT experience after taking a drop for 1-2 years.
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 13:19
+3 -2
A and B. They have rectified that. If you do not agree with their rectification, you should take it to court. Like the petitioners did. And failed.
C. A matter of English etymological debate.
D. They never did. There has not been a single proof of that found. No applicant has substantiated their claim yet according to legal standard. If they could, the court would have decided in their favour.
E. Them focusing on admissions means that they are focusing on the people who actually have been selected.
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 14:20
+1 -0
Hey Kian, please cover the RMLNLU ragging scandal. It has been exposed on Twitter that seniors make juniors call them "Sir".
Guest 12 Oct 2020, 15:12
+6 -2
You are the only person who gives that importance enough to call it a 'scandal'.
Guest 13 Oct 2020, 00:24
+0 -0
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/nujs-gets-18-students-for-domicile-quota-seats/articleshow/78610847.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/all-nri-seats-taken-at-nujs-this-year/articleshow/78628298.cms
Guest 14 Oct 2020, 05:19
+1 -0
https://www.barandbench.com/news/mnlu-nagpur-scraps-allotment-of-seats-under-maratha-quota-after-legal-notice

What's the story with MNLU Mumbai and Aurangabad?
Guest 14 Oct 2020, 09:41
+0 -1
Those still exist?
Guest 14 Oct 2020, 18:32
+3 -0
Who is div kr Singh who has scored all India rank 4...there is no information available about him... And he has chosen mnlu Mumbai over other top colleges... Why????
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 05:14
+0 -1
Can you quit copy-pasting the same thing in all posts? Nobody cares about your 'story'.
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 06:07
+1 -0
Very poor coverage by LI of post-CLAT developments, such as merit list rank analysis and domicile quota litigation.
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 06:31
+0 -1
Nobody cares.
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 08:55
+2 -0
List of law school stories LI needs to cover:

1. Recruitment figures across NLUs and JGLS, including number unemployed
2. CLAT rankers preferences
3. Whether NLUD is joining CLAT
4. Updates on faculty hires across NLUs
5. Latest updates on NLSIU and NUJS domicile quota litigation .
6. Lack of student body at NLUJ
7. NLU Sonipat protests
8.RMLNLU ragging scam regarding addressing seniors + TOI article alleging ragging through sex acts .
9.NLSIU's plan for Institution of National Importance status
10. NLUO and CNLU VC vacancies
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 09:06
+1 -3
Meh. Boring. There are better stories and issues.
Guest 15 Oct 2020, 22:41
+2 -0
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkYbkXJU8AEHiaN.jpg[/img]
Guest 18 Oct 2020, 16:52
+1 -0
12 people have declined NLSIU this year for other NLUs. Highest ever number.
Guest 19 Oct 2020, 07:24
+0 -0
NLAT zindabad!
Guest 19 Oct 2020, 14:36
+0 -0
Hope you are keeping well Kian. No updates for a while, esp on CLAT and NLU controversies.
Guest 21 Oct 2020, 00:30
+0 -3
There are rumours about seats for sale at some NLUs for children of influential people. Govt must investigate.
Guest 21 Oct 2020, 13:36
+0 -0
is there any headups on Grievance commitee
Guest 21 Oct 2020, 17:31
+0 -0
CLAT VC mafia has got news media to shut up. Sad.