Which historical and special objectives has NLSIU fulfilled successfully till date exactly? This is like JGLS trying to use their brochure as conclusive proof! What utter crap!

NLSIU itself has been formed under a state Act. How exactly is it NOT a state university until the Central Government nationalises it or gives it INI or IOE status?

Taking a rather serious view of this argument, it is quite farcical and legally untenable. If NLSIU is not a state university under the KA government, then what exactly is it? It's certainly not a Central University or even an autonomous specialised institute like the IITs or IIMs.

They are arguing that the law school exists by itself in isolation and is a stand-alone institute but that doesn't make any sense when you appreciate the fact that NLS does not provide constitutional reservations to OBCs and EWS because the state of Karnataka doesn't make the demand for its state universities to do so. So they want the benefits of Karnataka's reservation policies but want to avoid any regulation on them altogether at the same time. Then what is stopping this "Law School" from removing even the SC/ST reservation and truly becoming the "elitest of the elite"?

The Bar Council has simply executed a power of attorney to this "star alumnus" of NLS, Mr. Banerjee who is now arguing on ridiculous grounds to get rid of the domicile quota. I seriously hope that the Karnataka High Court takes a serious view of this misleading argument while giving its final judgment, but I fear it will not because the arguments from the counsel for the state of KA seemed flimsy, unidimensional and unconvincing. I request the right well-connected people to put this kind of information out in the right domain.
This is very similar to how the NLS counsels are misleading the Supreme and High Courts by saying that NLS is the only law school with a trimester system while NLIU Bhopal clearly still has it.

For the record, I am lawyer who is fully against any kind of domicile reservation which are politically targeted (most of them are), but this slimy self-serving attempt by NLS and its alumni to preserve its own autonomy while attempting to throw other NLUs under the bus needs to be shown for what it truly is.
No one in their right mind is going to admire or respect a law school which claims to be superior by seeking to compete on an unequal playing field.

The alumni of this law school don't seem to have the basic ethical integrity that is required to command respect as truly inspiring professionals. Instead, they want to utilise their first-mover advantage to somehow concentrate more power among themselves. It's time someone calls out this BS for the sake of the rest of the legal education fraternity in India.

I do not know the role of sja in this, but alumni are helping. Hope the court stays the 30% reservations.

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/aspiring-law-students-move-hc-challenging-30-domicile-reservation-in-wbnujs-162593

Venkat rao has a no talk only [...] attitude. Please credit Subbarao sir as well. The duo are behind this.

Stand with him out in the open. Instead of your remote proctored comments. #tubaharmiltohsahi

#WedontstandwithSudhir

Let the likes and objections determine how many people stand with Sudhir.

Salute to the CLAT aspirants, shame on the SJA.

Abhi toh party shuru huyi hai!

Controversy is often a by product of people actually doing their jobs. The problem of mediocre VCs skating by because they never took any action even as their institutions crumbled around them. Or worse actually worked to destroy those institutions by their incompetence is thankfully a thing of the past.

Sudhir is making good trouble.