How was your physical NLU Delhi AILET today? Test centre shortages dogged, aborted at least a few candidates

The NLU Delhi entrance test, the All India Law Entrance Test (AILET), has taken place today at physical test centres via a computer-based test.

NLU Delhi’s alternative to the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) has generally drawn upwards of 20,000 candidates, though this year NLU Delhi has refused to engage or confirm any figures to date.

All of our numerous calls to NLU Delhi’s registrar Prof GS Bajpai, who administers the process, have gone unanswered (say what you will about NLSIU Bangalore’s abortive attempt to start its National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT), at least they did share some information and respond to criticism).

By contrast, NLU Delhi has faced flak from candidates for a shortage of test centres in major cities.

The problem had been that some major cities only had two or a few test centres, meaning that on a first-come-first-served basis, all seats had often been quickly snapped up by candidates.

NLU Delhi had responded via the National Testing Agency (NTA) increasing the test centres to 111 in 64 cities and 22 states.

Nevertheless, we had heard some reports from aspirants that they had given up on the Ailet, after even they didn’t manage to get a seat in their home city in time after number of test centres had been increased.

One candidate told us:

On September 16, I received an email asking me to book a slot on the portal of the national testing agency which seems to be conducting the AILET. I immediately logged into the portal but it showed there were no slots available at the only centre in Hyderabad. I tried calling the helpline number and send emails saying that I was unable to book a slot but i did not receive any response.

Two days back, I was able to finally speak to someone from NLU Delhi who informed that there was a technical glitch and that I could rebook the slot for which a link was sent. However, I was still unable to book a a slot.

The NTA is completely unresponsive. The official who till yesterday attended the call after calling them continuously said that they could not help me and that I should reach out to NTA. My correspondence with NLU Delhi is appended for your reference. It is self explanatory. I had sent them almost 20 emails and called them innumerable times over last one week but to no avail. […]

I am resigning myself to the fact that I will not be able to give the exam because the NLU Delhi has not made proper arrangements and the entire exam is left to the mercy of something like an IRCTC system.

My point is that even AILET is also being organised in a haphazard manner. I was able to get in touch with some other people from my coaching class who are also not able to attend because they were not able to book a slot. Since when did Even attending exam become a lottery.

This is also the first major physical law exam in the Covid times and the CLAT is scheduled in two days, on 28 September.

If you have any feedback or criticism of the Ailet, or suggestions for what could be improved, please share your thoughts in the comments.

Update 14:51: Several accounts of Twitter have complained of issues:

Yukti Kashyap tweeted:

Today at AILET exam there was no social distancing, computers did not login at scheduled time students sat there for 2 hours, there were cases of cheating, no invigilator in exam hall. Given it is a national exam this can’t be tolerated

— Yukti Kashyap (@YuktiKashyao) Sat, 26 Sep 2020, 14:35

Malay Pandey tweeted:

Before An hour ago I gave the Ailet 2020 exam for BALLB program. The exam ended with technical issues and more more than 10 minutes got wasted. This technical error compounded with fake promises of providing extension of time by the administration.

— Malay Pandey (@malaypandey) Sat, 26 Sep 2020, 14:28

Sanjeev Chawla tweeted:

@PMOIndia @DrRPNishank @DG_NTA Entrance exam of AILET 2020 is not happening at Sant Gyaneshwar Model School, Alipur, New Delhi, reportedly due to technical glitches. Kindly intervene at the earliest to save future of our kids

— Sanjeev Chawla (@chawla_sanjeev) Sat, 26 Sep 2020, 12:18

inconsequential gibberish tweeted:

It seems like the real entrance test is being able to allocate a test centre to appear for #AILET pg by #nludelhi and @DG_NTA . Terribly disappointed by how poorly the test is being conducted. I haven’t been able to get an admit card and a booking since the past three days.

— inconsequential gibberish (@ArnavSh52576469) Wed, 23 Sep 2020, 13:26

Comments

Aggs 26 Sept 2020, 08:20
+20 -34
Say whatever you want about NLS and Sudhir, at least they had the courtesy to engage with the candidates and respond to criticism. This was a pure shitshow, so many candidates not being able to write due to shortage of test centres. And they aren't even confirming the figures!
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 08:46
+37 -11
Say what you want about NLUD, your indefatigable defence of Sudhir in all the posts deserves applause. With all his lightning responses, he managed to bring around 35% of the interested students to give his exam. NLUD might also be not doing it properly, but somehow I feel they would get more students from those interested to actually sit for their exam.
Aggs 26 Sept 2020, 09:00
+7 -15
The actual number of people who were able to sit for the exam aren't dependent on your feelings mate. It's quite obvious that the number was lower compared to previous years because of the way nlud is hiding the numbers. Around 23k sat for nlat, while historically around 20k sit for ailet every year. Their number is quite plausibly even lower this year. Can't give them the benefit of doubt when they're the ones hiding the numbers
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 09:19
+11 -3
Around 23k out of a potential 70k. And if not more than 20k sit for AILET anyway, then it is unlikely that the number who might have missed out would be comparable with the ones NLS had 'missed'. All I'm saying is that NLUD might not implementing things ideally, but to actually compare it with the fiasco that NLAT was on every single step from conception to implementation, is laughable and befits a Sudhir Bhakt.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:38
+3 -2
The AILET 2020 indore centre(Sage university) was full of glitches many systems were not working but my exam was started at sharp 11AM but due to the the voices of invigilators and students I wasn't able to focus and in between the exam the invigilator was asking everybody to sign and pictures.
Yuval 26 Sept 2020, 10:43
+7 -2
It just seems to me that you're desperate for AILET to be shitshow more than anything so that you can save face for the actual shitshow that NLAT was. But, unlike many others I believe that mistakes are bound to happen during these exteme circumstances. So, instead a discourse about the tenable solutions would be the way to go. Furthermore evaluating the grievances of those who faced difficulties should be a priority in order to reach a reasonable conclusion which clearly isn't happening here.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 08:31
+6 -10
Twitter is full of complaints. AILET was a giant scam. The test should be cancelled and the persons responsible should be arrested.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 09:11
+14 -5
So what's new? Hasn't it always been a giant scam?
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 09:25
+26 -5
First NIRF Rank One pulls off one tragedy, then NIRF Rank Two pulls off one comedy. Clearly, government rankings aren't everything.
G 26 Sept 2020, 10:08
+12 -7
Really? I did not know that 'conducting entrance exam' was a criteria in NIRF ranking.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 11:26
+8 -4
Quality of administrative decision making should be, as the events are clearly showing.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:45
+3 -0
It should be considering that these entrance exams are the only way to ensure that the best possible talent gets attracted to these institutions. Make no mistake, without quality students, the NLUs are nothing, regardless of their boasts of foreign-return faculty and infra.
Dwarka Dynamite 26 Sept 2020, 11:02
Contested
+4 -4
The admin should respond to the complaints raised.
Although, it should be noted that Ailet had greater number of centers than Clat will.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 11:03
+10 -2
I struggled to mark options as my mouse was not working. Also the technical glitches affected my performance.
When I shifted to another PC (which had normal mouse), I had many inconvenience
K6230 26 Sept 2020, 12:38
+9 -1
Who disliked this comment? This person is damn right. The systems that were provided to us for the exam, were of average to bad quality. When I tried to click on the next question, it started showing some glitches and almost took a minute or two to get normal. This happened to me about 5-6 times. Now, you can guess how much time I really got to attempt the exam. Although the exam was easy (for me) and I'm satisfied, but it's just the inexperienced staff and poor quality system that was really disappointing.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:08
+1 -0
You can clearly figure out where all that AILET money is going.
Interesting 26 Sept 2020, 11:13
+8 -5
Hopefully all the anti-NLAT crusaders will be at the SC on Monday morning asking that this be scrapped, and that NLU Delhi be required to take CLAT ranks for entrance. This seems worse in terms of both access (definitely) and cheating (possibly)
Sudhir Bhakt 26 Sept 2020, 12:30
+8 -1
[img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/l2Jhw8Oo6kVRWvTZm/200.gif[/img]

Secondly, it's not gonna happen
Lol 26 Sept 2020, 11:20
+6 -1
Looks like lessons were not learnt. Hope this will be challenged in the SC on the same grounds as raised by NLAT petitioners. Will probably get the exam struck down
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 11:25
+6 -2
Please tell me that how can i complaint against ailet test center because of technical error , I lost 15 minutes of exam, give me guidance .
AILET Aspirant 26 Sept 2020, 11:40
+8 -4
My experience was good in Mumbai. Faced minor issues at the entrance but overall a decent experience
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 16:57
+7 -0
even i was in a mumbai based center in kandiwali .The server went off for 4 mins but the time was still reducing nd like in the middle of the examination the invigi. was clicking our pictures on his phone for attence even that took like 1 min or 2.
btw there was a question in the exam where the option were like;
a] something....
b]something....
c] BOTH A ND C
it should have been a nd b

The instructions before the starting of the exam instructed that :
answered nd marked will be in blue
ans kept in review will be in orange
But there wasn't anything like that when in the exam
My table has saw dust on it nd when i told the invigi. he blew that away[with his mouth]
So i probably have corona now .
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:10
+4 -2
MY center was manav rachna University and we gave our exam at 2pm.Many of us were unable to login and ended up waiting till 12:30. Authority never gave us anything in writing regarding there mistake. Then we were taken to the room which was already used and unsanitized. Many students even cheated in the exam including suffering on Chrome for gk answers
Chap 26 Sept 2020, 14:29
+2 -0
If you're talking about the one in Faridabad then i too di gave my exam there. I got in on time. SoP were definitely followed. I agree the exam started late due to login issues but probably 20 mina laye than the official time. I didn't witness any instances of cheating in my lab, some students had difficulties with computor not working probably. The worst part was they were doing authentication AFTER the exam started!!

Also only those who just sat outside the centre waiting for the queue to be over were late.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:15
+4 -1
I am from jammu...no social distancing .. invigilators wearing no masks. I don't know what's gonna happen with clat..
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:20
+6 -0
I appeared for the AILET 2020 exam from test centre at PES Modern college of arts, science and commerce, Ganeshkhind , Pune. Firstly, the exam did not start at the correct scheduled time of 11:00AM and secondly the computers stopped working before time and the exam got automatically uploaded. There was total mismanagement of the technical support for conduct of this exam.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:27
+11 -2
My son gave the AILET exam today ..at the Rapid Online Testing Center , Mohan Cooperative Area, Badrapur....
There were 300 kids sitting all squashed up together .. sitting in close proximity with zero social distancing.. they were asked to line up for document verification in a line again without any distancing.
The testing agency did not follow any protocols and followed any SOP's for the same..
They have not been responsible for the health and safety of these children..even after postponing thier exam for Covid sake . And promised all SOP will be in place.. and nothing was adhered to..
If anything is to happen to these children who are mostly college bound in the near future.. who will take the responsibility for their I'll.health if any ..god forbid...
They have forced children to sit at centres for the exam ...and didnt keep up any norms ...
Who do we complain to.now...since the exam is now over and we could not even see what was happening inside...as parents were not allowed...nor were phones for a justifiable reason...but no one could have had the time to take pictures to prove this point.
This is seriously illegal in nature..and that to being done by the NLU
...
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 13:19
+5 -4
@13: Aunty, I request you and your son to take this up through legal channels. NLUD must not be allowed to get away.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:33
Troll
+8 -18
As usual, hate comments are by those jealous of NLUD's NIRF rank.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:14
+11 -1
Sometime I think trolls like you should be force fed print outs of that ranking certificate every day. The sheer insensitivity and arrogance that you display without anything to show for it in the real world is astounding.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:23
+6 -2
The fact that this comment is actually getting upvoted shows how many NLUD trolls frequent the comment section here. No self-respecting rational individual would approve of this comment given the context.
K6230 27 Sept 2020, 12:05
+1 -0
It's not..about...trolling!
It's the shitty experience and glitches and minor but very disturbing & distracting issues and glitches we got to experience!
Don't you get it?
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 12:55
+0 -0
@K6230: Did you mean to reply to some other comment? Because 14.2 is saying what you did only basically.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:42
+15 -0
I think so more than AILET, it's the bad management of the centres where exams were conducted. I am from Ahmedabad and here everything was done with immense care and caution. The Covid guidelines were followed, there were no technical issues, everything was perfectly working, the invigilators were very helpful and no cheating happened here. The whole exam went very smoothly.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 19:31
+2 -2
The responsibility is still that of the authority conducting the exam, in this case that being NLUD.
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 02:50
+2 -0
Wasn't the authority conducting the exam NTA?
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 05:56
+0 -2
You should look into the concept of agent and principal.
PG aspirant 27 Sept 2020, 11:19
+0 -0
In Bangalore too, the COVID protocol was followed and numbers in each computer lab were limited to ensure social distancing.
The question paper was an odd mix - lots of questions on the Indian partnership act and on basic contracts and torts principles. Some unfamiliar thinkers were included in the jurisprudence questions.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 12:43
+1 -12
There are many students who made it to the top CLAT NLUs but got a low rank in AILET. Possibly AILET is rigged and seats can be bought, or cheaters have a free run.
Guest X 26 Sept 2020, 13:12
+6 -0
Why don't you try buying one and let us know how it goes?
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:15
+1 -3
If anyone has bought one, why would they actually admit it and risk losing it?
Guest X 26 Sept 2020, 16:09
+3 -1
For the sake of the Legally India Comments Section Fraternity. The one brotherhood that unites us more than our love for our respective NLUs and hatred/contempt for all the others.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 13:16
+12 -1
The centre alloted to was Deen Dayal Upadhaya College, south-west Delhi. In contradiction to the guidelines mentioned in the admit card we were not frisked, meaning the phones were not checked for amd neither were our IDs. Moreover, we were asked to report to the centre an hour prior to the commencement of the exam in order to wrap up any formalities. AILET being a 90 min exam with 150 questions, every second is crucial for the candidate. After the exam commenced, the invigilators started coming up to us Candidates DURING THE EXAM WHILE THE TIMER WAS STILL RUNNING ON THE SCREEN, asking us to sign the attendance sheet, take off the mask to click a picture, provide photographs and what not causing the candidates in losing several crucial minutes in the exam and therefore further depriving the candidates from an already scarrce amount of time.
K6230 27 Sept 2020, 12:07
+0 -0
That's just annoying.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 13:20
+1 -5
Kian, NLUD trolls are downvoting comments critical of NLUD. Please ban comment voting on this thread.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 13:29
+1 -2
Sharing some more disturbing tweets. SC must cancel this exam as they cancelled NLAT. In any event, it is illegal for NLUD to be part of CLAT

More than 100 students could not give their #ailet exam. Technical issues at centre, what to do now? #ailet2020isajoke
https://twitter.com/ChiragMCOC/status/1309797955776385025

I've witnessed people cheating with literally no presence of Inviligators. LLM students were helping LLB students!
https://twitter.com/Ishika24206757/status/1309842241641353216

Respected sir it is to inform you that AILET 2020 at some centers was conducted in completely unfair & indisciplined manner. No invigilator & great havoc in some labs, server crash in mid exam, some students came out without giving exam after 2 hrs, also case of cheating
https://twitter.com/AmitSin12765129/status/1309818614975922176

Test Centre Number - "DLNOR172" didn't conducted the #ailet exam. More than 100 students are affected
https://twitter.com/ChiragMCOC/status/1309799035939639296

Sir , the career of 100 students is in danger Due to the lack of management at our respective center. Centre name Krishna digital solution narela opposite cpj college plot no 25/20/2-,.please do something. Ailet exam. We were not able to give exam.
https://twitter.com/Adityap62662696/status/1309782439611441153
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:19
+1 -0
Any relief available would probably depend on number of students affected. Class action might help, though a long shot. 100 out of 20000 plus would otherwise not be enough to get the court moving.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 13:35
+0 -0
The same issue faced my me as I am from jodhpur and nlu delhi only provide one center over here. Even after increasing centre number we were unable to book slots in major city like jodhpur.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 14:25
+3 -1
No issues were there at my test centre
Typo or deliberate 26 Sept 2020, 15:13
+3 -0
Prof BS Bajpai...what do you mean by BS.

He is GS Bajpai.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 15:19
+4 -0
Myself Aniket chattopadhyay from kolkata tried to book a slot on 18th sept 2019 onwards but I am so unfortunate that I could not book. Always it was written no slot is available. In kolkata only two centres, one in behala and other one at baruipur. They should have been able to increase the no.of centres. Can we ask for a refund?
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 15:19
+2 -0
Ill conduct of AILET 2020 in Sant Gyaneshwar Model School, Alipur, New Delhi. The exam didn't commence at the promised time. Moreover, due to technical glitches in the systems provided at that center, Half of the students got the opportunity to give the examination after half of the students finished the exam.
It fills me with discontent that this is our National Level Examination in 21st Century.
No systematic arrangements were made and social distancing norms were not even feebly brought into action.
A person (who was not even wearing the mask himself) was announcing the names of the students like a lottery wherein only half of the students got the opportunity to sit and give the exam at first. Other half students had to wait for 1.5 hour and no proper information was given to the guardian accompanying the student which left them in stress.
Added to this, one of the diabetic student who came to gave the exam had to wait for 1.5 hours at the center in order to give the exam. It wasn't good for his health too.
There were immense chances of unfair practices as exam was not conducted at the same time for all the candidates. It seemed like a park where anyone can enter at any time and no proper surveillance took place.
Added to this, the servers on which we were giving the examination, they were so outdated that the mathematical symbols of the AILET questions on the screen were not visible. Abox was coming at the place of some symbols and students had to assume what it can be. The questions were not displayed in the correct manner on these screens.
I don't know how the exam was conducted in other centres, but I was truly disappointed by the conduct of AILET examination at Sant Gyaneshwar Model School, Alipur.
I didn't expect such glitch on part of NLU DELHI and NTA.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 15:31
+5 -0
I gave the AILET pg exam today and everything happened smoothly. The entire process right from admitting the students, to ensuring sanitisation and proper social distancing to taking the exam, everything took place seemlesly. There were multiple invigilators who kept supervising the exam and there were no glitches. The centres weren’t over crowded either which was a big relief. I was quite happy with how the exam was conducted.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 15:44
+4 -1
There was no centre near jalgaon, Maharashtra. Not even in Aurangabad or Nashik. People like me who don't have a car cannot reach Bombay (500kms). And we also don't have a place to stay in Bombay. I was unable to take the test and this has been a denial of my fair opportunity. I tried to contact NTA several times but the NTA was unresponsive. They also don't respond to your mails.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 15:44
+1 -0
Due to technical issues from their side , i was unable to book my seat amd ofcourse the test centres are very few and far away from my home , they have to increase test centres as same as clat and due to this i was unable to attend my exam . So disappointing. There are so many questions related to this exam. But one thing i didnt understand why it is so important to take ailet exam just two days before clat , they dont even understand that how we adjust or make reservations in a hurry .
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 16:25
+4 -0
1. The keyboard of the computer that was alloted to me wasn't working even after assistance. Therefore I was shifted to another computer.

2. During the examination while trying to click 'next' after marking my answer the system was lagging. The screen froze and I could not do anything. I lost out on a lot of time (in an examination where there already exists a time crunch). The screen froze after every question and even while trying to switch between sections.

3. Towards the end an alert appeared that said '10 minutes remaining', even after repeated efforts the pop up didn't go. The screen had frozen. I asked for help and it took another 2-3 (IN THE LAST 10 MINS) before the screen started working again.

My mindset was completely ruined and I almost broke down. After studying for over 2 years all I really wanted was a fair chance.
Sanjana Sanjay Parihar 26 Sept 2020, 16:28
+2 -0
I attempted AILET today and I did not expect this lenient behavior from the conductors. Other than the leniency they were so many technical issues and glitches. These glitches cost me around 5 min of my exam. I think the candidates performance was really affected because of all these issues. I really expect a good and fair solution for all of us.

instagram - (@x_sanjanaa)
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 17:23
+1 -0
Government testing authority for the entire country is of this shoddy quality. And then they say rely upon government rankings.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 17:36
+0 -0
Kian, isn't this the first time that NLUD was conducting AILET via this computerised mode? So far the exam had always been on a pen and paper mode, right?
Random Guest 26 Sept 2020, 18:08
+0 -0
Yes.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 17:47
+0 -0
NLUD IT Cell desperate to cover up AILET problems.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 19:17
+2 -0
I couldn't give the exam because, first of all there was no center avail in my city knowing that during this crisis traveling is quite risky, secondly there were no slots in other centers. I tried reaching to NLU delhi hundreds of time, i called in almost every number till yesterday that was 25th September one day before the exam, there was no respond, i left so many emails, still no respond.
Calling it a national law entrance exam this was not expected, its not possible to tolerate.
Ridiculous.
Guest 26 Sept 2020, 19:31
+2 -0
My test centre for AILET was at Thakur College of Engineering, Kandivli. The exam was conducted in a haphazard manner. Their server crashed 5 minutes after the exam begun and we had to wait for 15 minutes for them to solve the technical glitches. No masks provided separately, no sanitizer provided inside the classroom (as written in the Admit Card) and just one blank rough sheet instead of 5.
The attendance sheet was misplaced and my name, along with 4 other students in my class were not printed on the sheet. It created a hassle where over 7-8 invigilators were standing in our classroom trying to locate the sheet while some were not even wearing masks, completely abandoning social distancing protocol. I do not know how smoothly the other centres conducted the exam, but my centre had quite a few problems which were easily forseeable and avoidable.
Concerned 26 Sept 2020, 20:25
+0 -5
Kian, why are you silent? Why haven't you been able to utilize your senior counsel contacts in the SC to challenge this exam? If the complaints in the comment section are anything to go by, this exam must be struck down as well
WornOut 26 Sept 2020, 22:57
+2 -0
My centre was in DAV Thane,Navi Mumbai.
The centre was neat and well sanitized before hand..there was no proper social distancing norms followed by the invigilators.
1)Masks were not provided if we were already wearing ones that looked similar to theirs.(Savings u see).
2)Thermal guns used.
3)No frisking,checking for UFM,phones or using the metal detector.
4)Invigilator came at 10.45am and started verifying at 10.55am.
5)They never asked us to start our tests,it was only after all the students prompted that the exam was allowed to commence.
6)Invigilator interrupted our exam to get our photos taken and even asked us to remove our masks in the middle of the exam and wasted a good 3-4 mins.
7)Attendance sheets were passed in the middle of the exam..it was a 20-30 pg booklet and we had to skim through it in the middle of the exam and locate our id and then sign it.
8)We had a nice computer lab which was also air conditioned..(Temperatures were a little freezing though).
9)There was a 3-4 second lag between the questions in the system..which was sometimes a pain.
10)In the last 10mins we got an alert regarding the time...but it was tough to dismiss this popup..and this continued till the last 50seconds..this was pretty irritating though..
11)only 1 rough sheet was provided instead of 5..looks like they were cost cutting..

There was no major technical glitches as such in our centre...the exam went like a breeze..the centre was good and well maintained...
We only had a problem with the invigilators who came late and wasted a lot of time!
If Im not wrong..he also did not ask us to sign in our admit cards..something which has to be done in his presence only,but he turned up late!
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 03:54
+1 -0
Yesterday I gave Ailet exam in Mundka.
No one was invigilating, no social distancing, invigilators weren't wearing any mask. And not to forget the main issue system glitch. Not only me but from the sound of banging the mouse on the table I could confirm that everyone was facing problem with mouse. To make it function properly we have to bang the mouse on the table. Due to which time also got wasted. If I click on the next ques. or option now it would response after 1 or 2 minutes later. Other than mouse wasting our time, invigilators also didn't leave any chance. They were taking attendence during exam. One time they would ask Id then after some time they would come again and ask for passport photograph for pasting on attendence sheet and signature then after some time they would come for clicking photo, That time I was like, Dude! Just take everything at once' why wasting my time?
I seriously want this exam to get cancelled...
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 07:58
Troll
+3 -4
I oppose AILET, but only because I believe that NLSIU, NLUD and NALSAR should have a common "Ivy League entrance test".
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 12:09
+0 -1
That's because you are as capable an irritant as poison ivy is.
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 12:56
+0 -1
Ivy League, lol! Blowing hot air much?
Guest 27 Sept 2020, 07:59
Troll
+2 -1
I am not sure if all the complaints here are genuine. Only one person has given his name.
Pi 27 Sept 2020, 10:54
+4 -4
We need FM to now lobby to get NLUD in the CLAT fold.
Guest 2 Oct 2020, 13:57
+0 -0
WHy the f*** should there be an AILET?
If NLUD can do their own exam, why bother with the CLAT?
Guest 2 Oct 2020, 14:29
+0 -0
Ranbir Tau ki marzi! CLAT is voluntary, not mandatory. Any NLU may opt out of it with due notice. Or not join it at all, like NLUD has done.