4 days to go: NLS exam to offer ltd pvt Rs 350 test centres in 14 cities • IDIA to also host 200+ • Exam now also Android, Mac, Linux, 512KBps

Relaxed technology requirements for NLAT though question marks remain
Relaxed technology requirements for NLAT though question marks remain

NLSIU Bangalore has relaxed the technical requirements of its National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT) that is happening in four days, to include more operating systems, to require less internet bandwidth and, in seemingly rare cases, allow candidates to take the test in test centres in 14 cities.

Test centres for all? Or just for some?

On its FAQ, NLSIU has also announced the option of test centres, though it does not seem like an option that is intended to be taken up by many candidates.

Buried in the accessibility section of its FAQs, NLS has introduced a list of exam centres in 14 cities for candidates struggling with the technical requirements of the NLAT (see full notification below).

The cost would be Rs 350, with the centres hosted by private agency Testpan India Pvt Ltd, so NLSIU explicitly stated that “arrangement is a private agreement between Testpan and the candidate and NLSIU does not bear any liability in relation to the same”.

A mobile phone number of a contact, Yogendra Chauhan, at Testpan has been provided for candidates interested in taking advantage (or risking Covid-19) at a physical test centre.

Considering there are around 70,000 candidates, let’s hope Mr Chauhan has call waiting enabled on his phone.

Seriously though, we understand from an NLSIU source that candidates are also able to contact NLSIU directly to get more details on test centres.

We have also reached out to NLSIU for a figure on how many places are available at each test centre.

It is understood that NLSIU is intending to add more test centres.

IDIA to also set up test centres

Independently and separately from NLSIU’s announcement, the Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access (IDIA), meanwhile, is also working on providing physical locations and test centres for those who need them.

According to a press release from the NGO, which works to provide access to top law schools for underprivileged candidates, the less than 10 days of prior warning provided by the NLAT to candidates had caused particular problems:

The short notice given for the examination makes it especially difficult for students from underprivileged backgrounds and remote areas to make the arrangements for the examination. As the technical requirements would create difficulties for many students who want to write NLAT, IDIA Charitable Trust (IDIA) plans to set up as many physical centers as possible for conducting the examinations in order to help the students.

Current estimate of seats available at these centers that are proposed to set up by IDIA is 200+. These physical centers would allow the digital divide to be narrowed. The centers will be in places like Telangana, Karnataka, Mumbai, New Delhi etc.

Operating systems

The technical requirements for the remote proctoring software, which effectively takes over candidates computers to monitor running software and processes, have been relaxed from requiring Windows operating systems to also include:

  • “Mac OS 10.13 and above and Linux (ubuntu versions 18.04, 16.04, 15.04 only) systems” (though the latest and very widely adopted Ubuntu version 20.04 is conspicuous by its absence), and
  • Android version 6 and later.

While welcome to widen access to the exam, which has faced serious criticisms and question marks, several questions remain on that front:

Can you even effectively take an exam on a smaller Android touchscreen?

Have tests been conducted on whether candidates on smaller Android mobile phone screens or Android tablet screens have a significant disadvantage versus those taking the exam on a larger screen.

Has the software been tested sufficiently on the new operating systems?

Has the proctoring examination software been tested sufficiently on other operating systems to ensure stability and integrity of the exam?

Support for MacOS, Linux and Android was just added in the last few days: according NLSIU’s FAQ that had been updated yesterday, “the NLSIU team is working closely with the vendors engaged for the NLAT 2020… is accessible to candidates using” those operating systems”.

However, software usually requires significant testing before roll-out, particularly something as invasive as proctoring software that is intended to take over webcams, microphones, and monitor background processes running on a computer to ensure no screen sharing or covert web browsing is taking place.

Operating systems such as MacOS and Android are generally more locked down on that front than Windows, so without more information it is impossible to say that this will go off without a hitch.

Bandwidth reduction

According to the updated technical requirements, 1 MBps internet connection is not required anymore but merely 512KBps are sufficient, which should make access easier on spotty connections.

7. Minimum Internet Bandwidth: 512 Kbps minimum; the remote proctoring software streams exam data, including audio and video, directly to the cloud as you take the NLAT 2020. In order to allow the continuous transfer of exam data, the specified minimum connection speed must be maintained at all times.

That said, due to the rapid rollout, it’s not possible to say whether those with slower speeds will face disadvantages vis-a-vis those on high-speed broadband.

For one, pages and exam questions may still load 20 times as fast on a 10 MBps connection as on a 512KBps connection, potentially gifting several seconds or more to those in cities versus rural candidates with weaker connections.

And the difference may be exacerbated if live-streaming webcam footage at the same time, which may eat up much of a 512KBps connection.

On the flipside, depending on how the bandwidth reduction has been achieved, those on lower speed connections may be transmitting webcam footage at lower quality, which could impact the effectiveness of the automatic proctoring software and human invigilators.

NLS notification of ‘accessibility’ test centre options

According to NLS’ FAQ, regarding the new test centres:

I am unable to meet the technical requirements for the NLAT at my home. What do I do?

NLSIU is committed to ensuring the NLAT 2020 is conducted in as accessible a manner as possible. Candidates can now take the NLAT 2020 at centres across India managed by Testpan India Pvt. Ltd., (“Testpan”) a national centre-based testing company. Testpan is able to provide technical equipment and space for those students who are unable to meet the NLAT 2020 test requirements in 14 cities across 14 states in India. In the interests of equity, candidates can avail these facilities at a minimal cost of Rs. 350. These centres will also strictly observe all the necessary COVID health and safety protocols.

Please note that the NLSIU is not responsible for technical problems, internet outages or any other issues that may arise at Testpan centres. The arrangement is a private agreement between Testpan and the candidate and NLSIU does not bear any liability in relation to the same.

Please also note that each centre will have limited availability and a centre-based option is in the interests of making the NLAT 2020 accessible for students who are unable to meet the requirements for a home-based exam.

Can I get more details on the Centres?

For candidates who wish to explore this option, Testpan offers centre-based testing facilities in the following cities:

Aurangabad, Maharashtra

Bhubhaneshwar, Odisha

Bikaner, Rajasthan

Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Dehradun, Uttarakhand

Gaya, Bihar

Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh

Guwahati, Assam

Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh

Jaipur, Rajasthan

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Nashik, Maharashtra

Rohtak, Haryana

Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir

This list will be updated on an on-going basis to ensure even greater accessibility.

Any candidate who wishes to explore this option may contact Mr. Yogender Chauhan, Testpan India Pvt. Ltd., +91 7428461194

Comments

Guest 8 Sept 2020, 10:51
+26 -2
It's all about Sudhir's ego now.
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 04:51
+6 -10
Stop this hate campaign against Sudhir.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 10:59
+19 -2
Sudhir is quite thick skinned it seems.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 10:59
+35 -2
See, this is why protests and dissent are important. Had everyone accepted the original decision meekly as the Sudhir-Bhakts demanded, then even these changes would not have been made. By doing this, NLSIU is already admitting that there are flaws in its original proposal. Now it is simply a case of degrees. Why should changes in the system keep happening less than a week before the exam? Why not give another week's time? And if you keep doing this, CLAT date is just 3 weeks away. What 'historical' objectives would NLSIU fulfill by giving its grads 2 weeks of extra online teaching? This simple action is itself admission of the absurdity of their decision. It shouldn't be perceived as any grand and compassionate gesture on their part.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 11:06
+3 -1
This. So much this. Thank you!
Ya no 8 Sept 2020, 13:21
+3 -23
If you seriously think that’s the chronology of events here you couldn’t be more wrong. Nls and Sudhir would have had to be working on these arrangements for days- this did not happen because of internet outrage on twitter. But this is proof of their good faith.
Bhai tu rehne de 8 Sept 2020, 13:46
+14 -0
Yeah, that's why they are making changes and additions with 5 days to go. Such a display of their efficiency and ability in thinking ahead!
Ya no 8 Sept 2020, 15:15
+1 -10
See - that would be true if they had given months of notice before the exam- but they are also working with short time frames. So yes their good faith effort in doing the best they can is why they’re doing this. If they were so cold hearted and wanted to exclude people intentionally- they needn’t have made any of these changes.

When was the last time trump/Hitler/Modi/ Tughlaq show signs of improvement.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 15:43
+9 -1
Tughlaq often did, actually. He failed because he had little clue about what his subjects needed or wanted. Rings a bell? You shouldn't neglect your history.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 16:04
+10 -0
So, Sudhir's better than Trump, Hitler et al? - Ok, accepted.

Now can we aim slightly higher?
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 17:01
+5 -1
Why? NLSIU is going all out for the 'pure English speaking urban elite' group it seems. Sounds fairly like [...] to me.
Ya no 8 Sept 2020, 19:37
+2 -1
With some people - getting them to admit that much is a start. So yes. I’ll call that a win.
Pa Pa Ya 8 Sept 2020, 14:16
+13 -2
You give too much credit to the man, as if he's some master plotter careful scheming out things. This chaos is proof that the whole thing was a clusterfu*k from the word go
Ya no 8 Sept 2020, 15:16
+2 -9
The point is that he’s not a mastermind. It’s that he’s doing the best he can. And he’s not this awful person folks want to make him out to be.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 15:43
+11 -0
If this is the best that he can do, then he doesn't deserve the chair that he occupies.
Stooge hunter 8 Sept 2020, 16:03
+13 -4
Can you stop being a stooge trying to defend the indefensible. The writing is on the wall here. I am baffled a Constitutional law scholar like him didn't figure out how arbitrary and unreasonable the decision was. And to all those posting TLC mafia messages to support Sudhir, note that two TLC profs Mustafa and Rao are now leading the fightback against the injustice
Keep at IT 8 Sept 2020, 11:39
+28 -6
As a Law School alum, I can say that everyone should keep at it, attacking Sudhir. This man is a threat to the institution. So glad that RVR has thrown his hat into this ring.
1. This exam is arbitrary - no way can such a short time be given to notify a public entrance exam
2. Access - many many people will find it difficult to access, even with these relaxations
3. Integrity - no consolidated rank list, risks of at-home exam being open to potential cheating etc. This is a huge blot on NLS as an institution itself.

Very glad Faizan is not taking this lying down. Law School will forever be indebted to the NALSAR VC for standing up to this bully.
Law School Alum 2 9 Sept 2020, 05:11
+7 -10
As a Law School Alum, I can say that Sudhir is the best thing that has happened to law school. His proposed projects and research grants for faculty, industry connections and proposed foreign collaborations with Ivy Leagues and Oxbridge are to be lauded. It's just been a year, give this man some time to reap the fruits of his labour
Alum 9 Sept 2020, 10:49
+4 -0
All well and good, but that doesn't excuse bungling this so publicly and inflicting irreparable damage on Law School.
Neither Trump nor Hitl 8 Sept 2020, 12:23
+14 -0
This reminds me of Mohommad Bin Tughluq.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 12:32
+11 -10
As someone who recruits several interns and fellow workers in his job, I usually have had an unspoken bias towards the students from top NLUs till date, won't lie about that. However, this is such a clusterfuck of a decision, that I and the people whom I work with are opposed to it on principle. We have decided that we are not going to give any internship or make any job offer to anyone from the NLSIU batch that gets taken in through this NLAT. It is not going to be a reflection on their quality, but more of a principled stand taken against this highly arbitrary, discriminatory and whimsical decision on their administration's part. I believe several other people are also thinking along the same line. People should know about this, and precisely whose fault it is for letting Law School suffer through this ignominy.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 13:12
+7 -6
With all due respect, you sound like anxiety ridden clat aspirant.
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 14:40
+2 -0
Why do you presume anyone cares about what you might think they sound like? I totally agree with comment 6. Sudhir is getting so much negative publicity for Law School with this one move that they had not got in the past one decade.
confused person 8 Sept 2020, 18:41
+2 -3
strange reasoning. while nlat is bad, i don't see why the students should be punished (see jgls and their abundant facilities...)... just don't give preference to nlus don't have to out down these kids...
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 18:31
+4 -5
Prashant Reddy (NSLIU alum and former NALSAR prof) has tweeted in favour of Sudhir and criticised RVR.

https://twitter.com/Preddy85/status/1303241494850080770
Outragekultur 8 Sept 2020, 20:06
+10 -9
Glad to see some academics are seeing sense. Nothing Prashant has said is factually untrue. The virtue signalling- especially from the likes of FM and Venkata Rao is so pathetic. And also so clever because now no one will look at the mess they created whether it was in running nls for ten years or in running nalsar now.
For those of you who don’t know Or have short memories- hundreds of Nalsar students boycotted exams earlier this semester / students from lower income/ Dalit and disable communities. And FM flatly refused to engage with them and insisted that students write weekly tests which has wreaked havoc on meeting educational goals at nalsar.
And FM had a lot more control over what happens within his own university to batches of students already admitted than Sudhir does having to work with that consortium of dinosaurs and dealing with clat aspirants whose situation and preferences change by the hour.

This is just nls choosing the best of bad choices. We cannot expect them to be perfect. No one is being perfect right now. By all means ask for as many inclusive rule changes as possible. but this Sudhir as villain and FM /RVR as hero narrative is just plain ignorant and arguably malicious.
Facts please 9 Sept 2020, 08:48
+0 -1
7.1 there is a difference between drawing conclusions from social media stories v. official notifications and interviews. Pls get more background before comparing.
nalsarite 9 Sept 2020, 10:08
+1 -0
I'm currently studying at nalsar and can vouch for the fact that students did boycott exams and faizan did refuse to acknowledge and engage with them. These are not just stories. The situation is not conducive to people reporting all of this to the media. so many people sent in emails talking about how the rules for this semester was causing them pain and making it very difficult to learn. the admin just did some drama about being hurt by the students "tone" and shut them up.
Lol 8 Sept 2020, 20:23
+0 -4
I don't see him supporting Sudhir in the tweet. Stop misquoting people.
Outragekultur 9 Sept 2020, 01:34
+4 -0
This is hilarious- does someone not know how to view tweets and replies? Click on that chat cloud to see his entire conversation with some nalsar students
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 10:28
+3 -2
Prashant's points in that thread are quite valid. Students really need to make up their mind on whether they want entrance exams this year or not. When JEE/NEET were held in offline mode, students all over were protesting at being exposed to COVID. When NLAT is being held in online mode, students are whining about other things. Yaar if you don't want an exam in the middle of the pandemic, just take a gap year and let those who want to write find their way? Instead of this endless criticism of every format possible. I am pretty sure if the offline CLAT had gone ahead on Sep 7 these same students would have been protesting against that as well.
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 11:33
+7 -2
The biggest whiners in this case seem to be Sudhir and his Bhakts. Mommy, I don't want to play with others, please let me play in an empty field and score goals like I used to back in the nervous 90s.
OutrageKultur 9 Sept 2020, 14:15
+1 -0
Ah yes name calling. The hallmark of every well made argument. Who is actually whining here and who is taking at least some action?
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 15:23
+0 -0
Oh, is that what you call what he's been doing? Taking action? I thought it is more like taking irresponsible decisions the adverse effect of which he won't have to face himself.
Guest 12 Sept 2020, 16:52
+0 -0
Somebody should ask [...] whether this NLAT fiasco is what he meant by the 'NLSIU standard' that other NLUs should aspire to before begging Sudhir to rejoin the consortium? These [...] and their misplaced delusion of grandeur about their alma! Has got no clue about existing state of legal education in the country, but has got a ready opinion on everything about it!
Guest 8 Sept 2020, 20:16
+1 -4
NEWS FLASH: Mad Mamata now declares lockdown on 12th Sep, i.e. NLAT day. LMAO.

https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/prove-it-and-ill-hold-my-ears-and-do-101-sit-ups-mamata-rubbishes-rumours-of-durga-puja-ban
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 15:25
+3 -0
12 September was a lockdown date declared much earlier. Sudhir doesn't care about such stuff because he thinks online exams are oh so cool. Despite never having given one himself back from his 'underprivileged' days of course.
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 16:53
+1 -0
St Joseph's, Bangalore waala underprivileged.