CLAT 2015 allotments late, scheduled tomorrow after technical & other issues with reservations

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2015’s first university allotment list will be released tomorrow (2 June), according to a notification on CLAT’s website, after having originally been scheduled to be released yesterday (31 May).

The notification stated: “Due to some technical reasons, publication of first indicative seat allocation list is postponed for 2nd of June, 2015.”

CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow’s vice chancellor (VC) Prof Gurdip Singh has not been reachable by phone and messages since last week.

However, a source close to the process told Legally India that the delay in releasing the preference list was due to many different state and other reservations according to which ranks are allocated to candidates.

According to the Allahabad high court’s 25 May order in a writ challenging CLAT 2015 for its irregularities, RMLNLU was directed to publish the university allotment list and the question paper of the exam on its website.

Comments

guest 1 Jun 2015, 16:22
+0 -0
Now just waiting for the allotment list.
Guest 2 Jun 2015, 03:39
+0 -0
IT SEEMS THE CLAT 2015 LLM QUESTION AND ANSWER PUBLISHED IS NOT IN THE ORDER OF THE QUESTIONS GIVEN TO CANDIDATES AT THE ENTRENCE TEST THUS RENDERING CORRECTIONS VOID.
Anon 2 Jun 2015, 06:40
+0 -0
[quote name="Guest"]IT SEEMS THE CLAT 2015 LLM QUESTION AND ANSWER PUBLISHED IS NOT IN THE ORDER OF THE QUESTIONS GIVEN TO CANDIDATES AT THE ENTRENCE TEST THUS RENDERING CORRECTIONS VOID.[/quote]
All the questions and sub questions are shuffled, and just one set is released.
They don't care.
Tam 2 Jun 2015, 05:53
+0 -0
The question paper posted by clat doesn't match the answer paper.There is a lot of discrepancy.
guest 2 Jun 2015, 07:59
+0 -0
FURTHER answer to question are wrong in post graduate.. for ex in Qno.79 of pg the answer wiil be c and not "a" . according to decision of sc in state of bombay v. kathi kalu oghad the accused can be compelled to give thumb expression and it is not violative of article 20(3)..