Law gets more sexy again by 20 to 54%: 40k already applied for CLATs 15 days before extended deadline

Law: Legally sexy (again)
Law: Legally sexy (again)
”)

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2015 will be attempted by at least 40,000 candidates vying for scarce undergraduate and postgraduate places, which is 20 per cent more than the 33,491 total CLAT takers last year.

CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow’s vice chancellor Gurdip Singh told Legally India that 40,000 candidates had completed their CLAT online registration, having paid application fees, as of 31 March 2015. This number includes both undergrad (LLB) and postgrad (LLM) aspirants, but there are still 14 days of applications to go under an extension to the deadline recently granted.

Singh told Legally India that around 40,000 candidates had registered for the exam and paid its application fee as on 31 March, but there were around 22,000 others who had completed CLAT’s online application form without depositing the fee but who would be likely to do so.

The application deadline was therefore extended to 14 April allow the candidates who had not yet paid the fee.

The exam for admission to 17 national law universities has seen an increase in candidates every year since its inception in 2008.

A total of 33,491 candidates appeared in CLAT 2014. However, in 2014 the year-on-year growth rate was the lowest in recent times for undergrad admissions. A total of 31,231 candidates had appeared for CLAT 2014 for LLB admissions, marking only a 5 per cent increase in the number of candidates since 2013.

However 2,260 LLM aspirants had appeared in CLAT 2014, which was a year-on-year increase of 63 per cent.

A breakdown between LLB and LLM applicants was not yet available for this year, said Singh.

Comments

Feminist 1 Apr 2015, 12:47
+21 -7
Using the term 'sexy' and posting a woman's picture!!! How could you, Kian?
kianganz 1 Apr 2015, 12:51
+17 -17
I believe I'm being trolled here, but if not, it's REESE WITHERSPOON as everyone's favourite fun and sexy legally lawyer! Who could possibly object?
Objection 3 Apr 2015, 04:40
+11 -6
Kian, the caption and the photo is quite sexist. Didn't expect this from you, unless all that you aim for is to become the Stardust of the legal world.
kianganz 3 Apr 2015, 06:28
+7 -9
Uh, have you even seen the movie Legally Blonde?

Well, I haven't for ages. :)

But as far as I remember:
1. It's about a young woman (Whitherspoon) who's more obsessed with fashion and whatever then law, but then some stuff happens and she turns out to be a kick ass lawyer. Or something along those lines.
2. She's also portrayed as a sexy lawyer in the promotional posters, etc.

To some, she single-handedly made law fun and sexy (not necessary in the sexual sense, more in the cool-sexy sense).
Be Cautious, Kian 3 Apr 2015, 06:44
+14 -7
Kian, please be afraid of NLUD misguided feminists now. You have simply played with your life. :p
Guest 7 Apr 2015, 14:37
+1 -0
[quote name="kianganz"]

To some, she single-handedly made law fun and sexy (not necessary in the sexual sense, more in the cool-sexy sense).[/quote]

Can we find this people and drive them out of the Bar? If one joins law because they were inspired by Boston Legal, The Practice or even Legally Blonde then its clear, we don't need a CLAT we need a mental health exam before admitting students to NLU's.
Guest 7 Apr 2015, 14:39
+0 -0
these* Damm this iPhone.
kianganz 7 Apr 2015, 14:43
+0 -0
With pitchforks?

Consider me in need of examination - when I was 12 or so, I saw some Robert Redford movie whose name I can't remember that made me want to be a lawyer. :)

Why else, if not for movies and books that glamorise the profession, would any normal pre-teen/teenager ever think that law is a cool subject that they should study? Maybe that's why so many drop out also when they realise it ain't all Ally McBeal? :)
Bombay Lawyer 7 Apr 2015, 14:51
+0 -0
Rumpole of the Bailey for me. :-).
kianganz 7 Apr 2015, 14:53
+0 -0
Ooh, I've never even heard of that. Will (legally) find some episodes to watch. :)

Edit: Woot, there's the pilot on YouTube:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eOOz39iA_Y[/youtube]
Bombay Lawyer 7 Apr 2015, 14:58
+0 -0
Must watch for every lawyer ever. Its brilliant.
Bombay Lawyer 7 Apr 2015, 14:45
+1 -1
Dear Objection, you have clearly gone mad if you think this is sexist. The entire movie i.e Legally Blonde is about a woman trying to be who she wants to be in a patriarchal law school environment that requires women to desexualise and dehumanise themselves in order to be taken seriously by the males.

The whole purpose of the illustration is to show how people who don't fit in to what is considered the mainstream are now choosing to do law (Not going into the merits of it). It is an appropriate cultural reference in this context. It is certainly not sexist. Also, you can't just call someone a sexist in public and not explain yourself. It shows non application of mind. If you think something is sexist the least you can do is tell is why it is so.
Bombay Lawyer 7 Apr 2015, 14:46
+1 -1
It actually has very strong pro feminist themes. This I know for a fact because the girl I was dating at the time she dragged me to watch this film was very feminist and she insisted on giving me a live feminist commentary as it was playing. However, I wasn't paying attention so I don't remember much more of what she said apart from the theme I just outlined above.
kianganz 7 Apr 2015, 14:47
+3 -0
Fun fact: Legally India was kinda named after Legally Blonde (though I've just seen it once ages ago and can only remember about 3% of it)
Bombay Lawyer 7 Apr 2015, 14:54
+0 -0
Apparently they've made a sequel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legally_Blonde_2:_Red,_White_%26_Blonde
guest 1 Apr 2015, 18:12
+3 -2
Please do a ranking of CLAT law schools plus NLUD to help students.

Also how does the number of CLAT aspirants compare with IIM CAT?
Guest 1 Apr 2015, 20:53
+2 -2
http://www.legallyindia.com/Blogs/an-attempt-at-a-new-comprehensive-law-school-ranking
ABC 2 Apr 2015, 04:32
+1 -2
This is not a ranking by Legally India. Just some individual ranking by a user. This is very misleading and I know for a fact that some coaching centres are citing this ranking and claiming it as a Legally India ranking.

Kian and Prachi, please disclaim it and ask coaching centres not to use this ranking.
kianganz 2 Apr 2015, 04:47
+1 -1
Seriously?? Coaching centres are using this? WTF?
kianganz 2 Apr 2015, 05:01
+2 -0
Have added a health warning to the top of that blog post:

[EDITOR's NOTE: This is NOT an official Legally India ranking of law schools. The safest ranking you could probably go with are 2014's CLAT preferences ( http://www.legallyindia.com/201407174887/Pre-law-student/clat-2014-preferences ), though this excludes NLU Delhi. There's also our approximate 'recruitment power ranking', which gives an indication of last year's recruitment strength at national law schools, though this also needs to be read with a pinch of salt ( http://www.legallyindia.com/201410315253/Law-schools/law-schools-recruitment-power-rankings-2013-14 ).]

That said, Ritwik Verma's ranking is probably not way off and too damaging, though in the middle the ranking could be a bit questionable since it's very hard to objectively judge between them...
NLU Delhi Mahila Mandal 1 Apr 2015, 18:32
+7 -1
Get out, you s*xist p*ig (Placard) Lol :P
Tushar 1 Apr 2015, 18:36
+0 -0
Earlier on there used to be good coverage of issues affecting legal education in Legally India. Nowadays this is missing. It will be good if there can be some in-depth reports identifying problems facing legal education, such as inadequate funding, poor quality faculty etc.
Guest 2 Apr 2015, 04:27
+0 -0
Kian you should do so story for Mint comparing CLAT with CAT. Is is easier to get into IIM A/B/C than one of the top law schools?
kianganz 2 Apr 2015, 05:02
+1 -0
I would have thought it's definitely harder getting into IITs, IIMs not sure...

Let's do some (very bad) maths to get an idea (Disclaimer: I know almost nothing about IIMs so this could be completely rubbish). Wikipedia says: 167,830 CAT applicants in 2014. Is CAT only for postgrad or also undergrad? I'll just assume postgrad.

IIM Kozhikode has 650 MBAs, Cal has 868 postgrads, Lucknow has 825 postgraduates (Source: Wikipedia).

So let's say, 800 postgrad seats are available in each college. That makes odds of getting into the 'top' one, roughly 0.47%.

Let's just assume NLS has 80 places available for general list clatters. With 40,000 applicants, that would be 0.2%.

So yes, getting into NLS (or NLS + Nalsar) is possibly as tough as the top CAT college now... (Again, not sure at all, this rough calculation could be slightly off - please do make corrections...).
Prachishrivastava 7 Apr 2015, 03:26
+1 -0
The statistical odds apart, just looking at the syllabus gives us a loud resounding NO in answer :)
Prachi? 7 Apr 2015, 06:08
+0 -1
Prachi, I do think that you need to appreciate and rather respect the difference in the syllabus, required for CLAT.

Surely, both examinations happen at different levels. While CLAT is for 12th grade students, expected to solve intriguing legal aptitude questions, CAT is expected to be undertaken by more mature students. But, I bet even they can't answer the legal aptitude questions.

Respect CLAT, Prachi. The answer is YES. It's better if LI gets rid of the dismissive tendencies. The arrogant already had a fall. :)
Prachishrivastava 7 Apr 2015, 06:25
+1 -0
Of course it is like comparing apples and oranges - comparing the level of CLAT for undergrads and CAT for grads/postgrads.

Where a 25 year old grad/postgrad is concerned (under the new, age no bar rule) hand on heart, is it really difficult to judge which one is easier?

I (not LI) wasn't being dismissive.

Best wishes,
Prachi
Bill Carson 21 May 2015, 02:28
+0 -0
Are we comparing IIMs with NLUs seriously??????
Cartman 2 Apr 2015, 09:55
+2 -1
In America magazines like the Princeton Review bring out a detailed college guide with info about colleges and have lists like best courses, best professors, best party college etc. We need such a guide in India!
MCBCI 21 May 2015, 02:29
+0 -0
No, we don't
rocksolid 31 May 2015, 06:53
+0 -0
I have following questions regarding CLAT 2015:
1. There is a interview of Mr. Gurdip Singh VC of the Lucknow Law University where he states that, since the exam in online in 2015, the candidates will get the score instantly. That is very logical but did not happen.Obviously something has gone wrong terribly that they needed 10 more days to fix the results.
2. The promise to put papers and answer sheets online is also gone awry.
3. Most high ranked candidates are from one or two institutes from UP, is one accusation. Needs to be proven, of course.
4. If each succeeding years the NLU get mired in such charges, there is no sanctity left to their words and actions.
5. Now I hear there is some litigation about wrong ranking? with such state of affairs, I wonder what is the standing of these institutes really. The local law colleges may be better.