CLAT upper age limit to remain unchanged despite Allahabad HC judgment

The 20-year age limit to appear in the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) remains unaffected by the Allahabad high court judgment of May 2014, in which the court had noted that there can be no such restriction since the Bar Council of India (BCI) had already scrapped the maximum age limit on undergraduates.

CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU’s vice chancellor Prof Gurdip Singh commented: “In the core committee meeting we discussed this issue. It was pointed out that [the judgment] was applicable to only those [two candidates who had filed the petition before the Allahabad HC]. There is no high court judgment coming in the way [of the presently fixed eligibility criteria].”

When asked about the effect of the high court’s observation that a BCI notification had declared the age limit criteria unconstitutional, Singh said: “The core committee has the power to independently decide eligibility criteria. The order doesn’t affect the authority of the CLAT core committee as such.”

The Allahabad high court had in May directed CLAT 2014 convenor GNLU Gandhinagar to allow two 21-year-old CLAT aspirants to appear in the entrance test.

This year’s age limit relaxation has been granted to candidates from the persons-with-disabilities (PwD) category, from which candidates up to 22 years of age can now appear, as reported by Legally India. Until CLAT 2015, only candidates from the scheduled categories (SC/ST) were granted this relaxation.

Comments

K.Rajan 20 Nov 2014, 07:04
+4 -4
The supreme court by it's order on 13.11.2014,scraped the age ceiling for law college admissions for all law colleges, no exception given to CLAT eligible students. BCI also withdrew the appeal petition filed in the highest court for fixing age ceiling. No rules can go in contrary to the provisions of Advocates Act 1961.Hence, core committee norms should be replaced with provisions of Advocates Act.
Lawyer 20 Nov 2014, 10:09
+6 -3
What are you trying to say?

That apart, upper age limit on enrollment in law college and bar council is essential, to maintain decorum and dignity of the profession. Half of them who enroll these days are above 30-40-50 and well known offenders and politicos.

Is the scenario the same with MBBS/BE or any undergraduate or professional education. Will medical education be opened up for a 70+ person?

Why punish only legal profession by opening it up to all and to whomever wants to join it as and when they wish to join, at their own whims and fancies and giving competition to young lawyers, who enters profession at an young age with big dreams.

This unhealthy competition between young lawyers and old (who enrolls after 30-40) is discouraging young professionals to leave the profession for survival.
Good decision 20 Nov 2014, 22:47
+6 -6
Very good decision indeed. I was not looking forward to study with some 25-30 years old chap :/
ASHUTOSH UPRETI 22 Nov 2014, 13:10
+9 -4
Nani Palkhivala: The Courtroom Genius entered law school after he earned a master's degree in English literature
Guest 25 Nov 2014, 06:08
+6 -3
this is cotempt of court
rishabh 29 Nov 2014, 05:47
+4 -0
friends we do something if high court has give kanha and another permission to seat in exam so why should i not .. i will go to high court for permission how many of you join me
anuj rai 29 Nov 2014, 13:30
+3 -0
i ll join u or kitne log h pls support us.it is unfair...
anuj rai 29 Nov 2014, 13:31
+3 -0
i ll also want the age relAXATION
anny 29 Nov 2014, 16:48
+1 -0
me too on same point should not be biased yr
Devasheesh Pathak 30 Nov 2014, 06:51
+4 -0
Guyzz I'm from Allahabad and I'm also in same situation and going to file case In Allahabad Hughcourt regarding age limit issue...if any one has to file case then he may contact me.. 9792999444
rishabh 1 Dec 2014, 13:41
+1 -0
i m with you
utkarsh 4 Dec 2014, 17:31
+0 -0
I will mate.
My email
CLAT Aspirant 5 Dec 2014, 10:16
+1 -0
This is just blatant injustice on the part of the CLAT Core Committee.If the needful is not done I'm willing to file a Writ Petition under Article 226.It would be unfair to let 2 21 yr olds sit for the exam and then subsequently not let other students sit for the exam.The CLAT COMMITTEE.....trouble guaranteed every year. Shame on you. This is not have a national level exam should be conducted.