Amarchand-Ropes, Cravath, NDA-Paul Weiss bag $1bn Bain-Genpact deal

Amarchand Mangaldas Mumbai and Delhi advised Bain Capital with US firm Ropes & Gray in the $1bn purchase of 30 per cent of shares in global outsourcer Genpact, which was advised by Cravath Swaine & Moore. Two selling private equity funds were assisted by Nishith Desai Associates and Paul Weiss.

Amarchand Mumbai partners Ashwath Rau and Vandana Pai Bharucha acted for Bain with a team led by Ropes Boston-based partners Will Shields and Newk Stillwell. Amarchand Delhi partner Naval Chopra provided Indian competition law advice on the transaction for Genpact. [Correction: An earlier version of the story erroneously stated that Chopra was instructed by Bain]

Cravath partner Sarkis Jebejian led the team for Genpact, which was founded in India in 1997 as a General Eleectric outsourcing unit, and is headquartered in Bermuda. Genpact is understood to have only required minimal Indian legal advice, according to a US-based lawyer involved on the transaction.

The selling shareholders, General Atlantic and Oak Hill Capital Partners, were advised by NDA managing partner Nishith Desai together with London-based Paul Weiss partner David Lakhdhir. Both funds will retain around 10 per cent of shares in Genpact after the transaction.

Genpact operates in 18 countries with around 55,000 employees, of whom 3,000 or 5 per cent are based in the US, reported Mint citing the company’s press release.

Ropes’ team also included private equity partners Alison Bomberg and Marcia Ellis, finance partner Byung Choi and tax partners Chris Leich, David Saltzman and Rom Watson. Intellectual property (IP) partner Harry Rubin, antitrust of counsel Deidre Johnson were also involved with a number of associates.

The Cravath team also included partner Thomas E Dunn on corporate matters, partner James C Vardell III on finance matters, partners Michael L Schler and Lauren Angelilli on tax matters and a raft of associates.

Comments

Bangalore Lawyer 23 Aug 2012, 05:17
+14 -0
Competition law advice on a Private Equity deal ?
Clarifier 23 Aug 2012, 06:42
+2 -0
Naval at Delhi advised Genpact on competition issues and Nisha at Mumbai advised Bain on competition issues.Seems the AMSS comptetition team is gaining great admiration and trust.
Clarified 23 Aug 2012, 13:18
+2 -0
Naval advised Bain. Where is Nisha advising anyone coming from? Unless you mean she advised Naval!

It seems Genpact didn't engage an Indian law firm.
Reader 24 Aug 2012, 05:13
+0 -0
See correction in the article. Naval advised Genpact on Competition Law and Nisha advised Bain.
Clarified 24 Aug 2012, 08:18
+1 -0
No conflict? or no policy?
scooter 29 Aug 2012, 09:59
+0 -0
heard of a Chinese wall?
Competition 23 Aug 2012, 08:36
+5 -0
There seems to be too much competition in the AMSS Competition Department!
A0-A1 mouthpiece 23 Aug 2012, 09:36
+7 -0
Note the lack of associates on the deal.
GC 23 Aug 2012, 09:58
+1 -0
A0-A1 mouthpiece.....So what??? Learn to do your work well and be a Partner first rather than complaining or better still set up your own firm and be the Managing Partner right away. Even Cravath, Paul Weiss or Ropes & Gray, does not have associate names so why should Indian firms be different whether its AMSS or NDA !!!!
A0-A1 mouthpiece 23 Aug 2012, 11:07
+19 -0
GC - Does that stand for General Counsel. If it does, I suspect you've started your own company and become its GC. Why don't you open your mind to this concept called sarcasm?

In this case, the reference to associateswas made because AMSS has been making associates take the fall for partner follies, which is probably why it makes good sense to always have an associate on all transactions.
kianganz 24 Aug 2012, 08:29
+5 -0
Actually, to clarify - Cravath and Ropes had a list of nearly a dozen-odd associates but we left that out because no one in India would know who most of those guys are, probably...

It's just a firm policy - some firms will mention, some won't. In India, I believe, some firms are worried that if they list the associates on a deal they may get poached by headhunters, which is why they may not list.
Young Lawyer 23 Aug 2012, 10:09
+17 -0
AMSS at present need to focus more on their HR policies considering the recent fiasco.
The Colonel 23 Aug 2012, 21:32
+15 -0
The story and the PR goes to show how the AMSS Partners take all the credit about a deal and leave the debits for the associates, as they did in the CLB disaster. Some folks never learn....
Name/Nickname/Title 24 Aug 2012, 15:27
+16 -0
Was AM involved in the Birla+Pantaloon transaction that was kicked out by the CCI this week? That's a real fiasco.

If so, not a good week for them.
Sour grapes? 28 Aug 2012, 18:09
+0 -0
Congratulations to Shwetha and Delhi team for obtaining approval on the ADitya birla - Living Media deal. As an in-house counsel who keeps a close watch of this sector I am very impressed by all in Amarchand competition team.
Pallavi, well done on guiding your young ones (literally) - Shwetha and Naval are solid.
Best wishes,
A
Major Minor 29 Aug 2012, 01:33
+2 -0
Some good news for them is probably welcome in the light of the last few weeks of news for amss.

But I would really be interested in knowing what happened on the Pantaloons deal that was rejected. From the name of the poster "Sour Grapes", it seems safe to assume that amss was on this deal? Who were the lawyers on this, where there other firms, and what actually happened? Kian-can you get more details on what happened because this seems very unusual occurence?

I also thought there was a Bombay AM competition team? Is that not the case?
scooter 29 Aug 2012, 10:03
+0 -0
the lawyers dont change facts of a deal. if the deal is anti-competitive, it will be rejected. it is not because of the lawyers.
associate 29 Aug 2012, 03:46
+0 -0
A $ 1 billion deal! Very impressive for all the firms involved!