Amarchand, AZB trade places in latest $200m KKR deal for Gland Pharma

Amarchand Mangaldas advised private equity major KKR on its Rs 1,300 crore ($200m) investment into pharma products company Gland Pharma, advised by AZB & Partners, with existing investors represented by Wadia Ghandy and Tatva Legal.

Amarchand Mumbai managing partner Cyril Shroff and Bangalore corporate partner Reeba Chacko led the team of advisers for KKR, assisted by Bangalore real estate and litigation Partner Namrata Kolar and Mumbai competition partner Nisha Kaur Uberoi.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett reprised its role as KKR’s default global counsel.

AZB Mumbai partner Essaji Vahanvati acted for Gland Pharma, with tax advisers Ernst & Young in Mumbai and Hyderabad.

In April, the two Indian firm’s roles were reversed on a KKR deal, with AZB acting for KKR and Amarchand for the target Alliance Tire Group, in the $630m investment.

Private equity investor Evolvence India Life Sciences Fund, through its EILSF Co-Invest I LLC entity, instructed Wadia Ghandy Bangalore partner Ankit Majmudar with KPMG assisting on tax advice.

Agreements were signed on 27 November 2013 with conditional close pegged for 31 March 2014. “The investment is proposed through a combination of a preferential allotment by Gland Pharma and a simultaneous purchase by KKR of the entire stake held by EILSF Co-Invest I LLC, an affiliate of Evolvence India Life Sciences Fund,” stated an Amarchand press release. “The closing of the transaction is conditional upon regulatory approval, including from the FIPB and the CCI, and satisfaction of other customary conditions precedent.”

The deal is one of the largest private equity deals in the pharmaceutical sector, valuing Gland at up to Rs 4,000 crore, reported the Economic Times.

Comments

Anon 29 Nov 2013, 11:47
+3 -0
Gland... Its Gland. Amarchand and AZB are glad.
kianganz 29 Nov 2013, 11:49
+0 -0
Right you are, it is - sorry for the typos!
Debasree 30 Nov 2013, 12:14
+1 -7
The is not fully true reporting as Amarchand & Mangaldas had very little role in the deal and Simpson Thacher did all the work . Special Kudos also to Varun Chandra of AZB for putting in all the expertise on regulation of medicine industry in india. Anyways its not that big a deal for so many lawyers to be present.

Best Regards,

Debasree
Dazed and Confused 30 Nov 2013, 17:01
+1 -2
[quote name="Debasree"]The is not fully true reporting as Amarchand & Mangaldas had very little role in the deal and Simpson Thacher did all the work . Special Kudos also to Varun Chandra of AZB for putting in all the expertise on regulation of medicine industry in india. Anyways its not that big a deal for so many lawyers to be present.

Best Regards,

Debasree[/quote]

Since when did Varoon advise on [medical industry]????? Get your facts and grammer straight.
Amicus Curious 1 Dec 2013, 03:02
+3 -0
Kian, do you verify the deal team and lawyers involved before publishing a report? This report seems to be based on a press release by one of the firms involved. What if the other firm wanted to name more lawyers as having worked on the deal? It's unlikely that a deal of this size that had 4 partners and a foreign law firm on one side had only one individual representing the company.
Debasree 1 Dec 2013, 10:50
+0 -7
It is a small work so please dont says that many lawyers were involved. These days every paralegal and junior associate wants to take credit for big deals anywhichways who could not have been got by firm without the senior partners.

Best Regrads,

Debasree
Amicus Curious 1 Dec 2013, 12:29
+3 -0
Yes, advising on a matter that seems to be the biggest private equity investment in the sector, and involving some of the sharpest legal minds in the country, would truly qualify as "a small work".

Still awaiting Kian's response.
kkkkkk 2 Dec 2013, 04:37
+5 -0
[quote name="Debasree"]It is a small work so please dont says that many lawyers were involved. These days every paralegal and junior associate wants to take credit for big deals anywhichways who could not have been got by firm without the senior partners.

Best Regrads,

Debasree[/quote]

I don't understand... you say "it is a small work". Then you say "wants to take credit for big deals". First, make up your mind.

You sound so much like a senior partner already. And what is wrong if a junior associate wants to take credit? If he has worked on the deal and contributed to the deal, he or she deserves every credit.
Legally Socialist 2 Dec 2013, 15:15
+2 -0
It wasn't one individual, it was the Essaji.
Anonymous Guest 7 Dec 2013, 12:50
+0 -3
FYI, I am a senior associate and entitled to take credit. Anyways most of the junior associates and pralegals dont do any great job and I have to keep reviewing their works. It seems you are a junior associate who wants to enjoy the limelight without doing much except ordering food and billing clients. people like you lead to problems for the clients.

Best Regards,

Debasree