PXV opposite NDA in early stage Patni-family TranServ VC deal

Stacks of postpay: likely to cause credit crunches
Stacks of postpay: likely to cause credit crunches
Exclusive: PXV Law Partners advised its long standing client, prepaid payments program manager TranServ, in its sale of equity to venture capital (VC) fund Nirvana Venture Advisors, which was advised by Nishith Desai Associates.

PXV Law Partners partners GT Thomas Phillippe and Deepto Roy with associate Shivani Chugh acted for Mumbai-based TranServ, which was founded last year.

Phillippe said that TranServ had been a PXV client since the company was founded. PXV was a January 2011 rebranding of RDA Legal, which was started in April 2008 in Delhi. RDA’s cofounding partner Rohit Das left PXV in February of this year over differences in the vision of the firm.

Nishith Desai Associates associates Karan Kalra and Neha Sinha acted for Nirvana Venture Advisors which is a $75m early stage VC fund co-founded by Amit Patni of Patni Computers. Partner Bijal Ajinkya had acted on the initial formation of the fund. Nirvana invests primarily in the internet, mobile and electronics payment space, according to Deal Curry.

The deal value was not disclosed by the parties to the transaction.

TranServ partnered with Nirvana to develop low-cost delivery and operating models of prepayment that would help banks and other companies who want to expand to prepaid products, according to press release.

Nirvana’s chairman Amit Patni, and managing director Rajan Mehra will join TranServ’s board of directors as part of the deal, reported VC Circle.

Photo by Andres Rueda

Comments

LI 16 Jul 2012, 17:34
+6 -0
And this deserves an entire article because? Since when did LI start reporting deals before they're done? What's with the obsession with PXV? Agreed it's an inspirational start-up, but that's it. It's not a Trilegal.
RN 17 Jul 2012, 07:07
+0 -0
Completely agree
kianganz 17 Jul 2012, 07:17
+7 -0
Appreciate your feedback, but we're damned if we do, damned if we don't... We get complaints that we are covering too much from the big firms, so we're balancing this out with small and mid-size firm coverage when we can.

In particular, PXV is an interesting firm and this the first deal of PXV's we are reporting in over a year, as well as the first deal post-split, so it is significant to see what clients have remained and what kind of work such start-up firms do in general.
Delhi Lawyer 17 Jul 2012, 11:56
+0 -0
Kian - I agree with your explanation and firmly believe that younger firms, especially start-ups deserve a mentioning. But, I don't understand why do you report a deal whose worth is not known to the readers ? I request you to refrain from publishing such deals where firms decline to disclose their worth. Thank you !
Silly boy 17 Jul 2012, 13:40
+3 -0
That's silly. The parties are the ones who have not disclosed the deal. The deal has been reported widely. If the client doesnt want to disclose the value - how can their lawyer? As for whether or not the story deserves to be published, thats a totally separate issue.