Court Cuts: SC slaps litigant with Rs 25k costs for awful grammar & syntax translation of Hindi order

The Supreme Court on Friday imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on a petitioner in a criminal case for filing an erroneous English translation of a judicial order in Hindi which was wrong on grammar, construction of sentences, usage of words and punctuation.

Asking the petitioner to deposit the cost within 24 hours with the legal service authority, the vacation bench of Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Ashok Bhushan said that the cost would continue to increase in the event of failure to deposit the amount within the stipulated time.

The displeased judges said that they had to struggle for one hour to figure out the sense of the order, and that they have never come across an order blended with such grammatical and other mistakes.

The court imposed the cost after lawyer Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for petitioner Vardha Ram, told the bench that the grammatical errors that the court was finding in the high court’s order were in fact on account of a faulty translation from the original order in Hindi.

Initially, the apex court bench had objected to the lower court judge passing an order in English with so many errors, including in grammar, syntax, word usage and punctuation, and sent the order back to the subordinate court to pass a fresh order.

However, after Bhati admitted to a mistake by the “official translator” of the court, the vacation bench has now instead imposed costs on the petitioner.

“You should have seen it (translation) yourself,” the court told the lawyer.

“You should be sorry,” the bench said.

Comments

OUCH 20 May 2016, 13:15
+5 -1
The translator is a court translator. How is a correct translation the petitioner's responsibility. Even if the petitioner should have taken due diligence, I don't see why costs should have been imposed. This is extremely unfair.
Tortured Soul 20 May 2016, 15:36
+3 -1
I completely understand what the Judges would have gone through.

Ouch, if you really want to know, please share your email and I will send you an actual english representation made by a doctor which I had to use in court proceedings. If you (I dare you) go through it once, you will know why the Judges imposed punishment.

There are very few forms of torture which will pass through the UN Conventions and the torture of being forced to read a document which MUST be read with so many mistakes that your brain fries is definitely one of the top ones.
Rational_Being 22 May 2016, 22:39
+1 -1
Hey, as much as I understand the agony, I fail to appreciate, or even understand how was the responsibility settled on the petitioner and why the costs imposed onhim when the error was of the "court translator". If anything, the Registry or the person responsible (the actual translator) should bear the burden, and should be pulled up for the shoddy job.
Order order 24 May 2016, 07:12
+0 -0
I don't think it is as simple as that. If you read the article carefully, it says that the judges first sent the order back to the lower court judge to rewrite the order. It was only when the lawyer for the petitioner 'admitted' that it was a translation that the judges imposed that fine. I think it was a valid imposition, as much for submitting a lousy translation (regardless of who translated it) as for having misled the judges in the first place. People should think twice about misleading judges or wasting the court's time with horrible translations.