Articles tagged with: Prashant bhushan
Despite BCI’s protestations, Delhi HC stays its ordering Guj disciplinary proceedings against Dushyant Dave
Senior advocate Arvind Nigam won temporary relief for Dushyant Dave who was to face disciplinary proceedings before the Gujarat bar council (SBC) for his alleged remarks before the Supreme Court in the judge BH Loya death case, reported PTI and others.
Legally Explained: Can I get my neighbour’s cell phone tower removed now, after SC applied ‘precautionary principle’
In a first of its kind, the Supreme Court on 30 March directed the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) to deactivate one of its cell phone towers, located in a residential area in Gwalior since 2003, on the mere suspicion by a petitioner that it might have caused the cancer of a resident, working in its vicinity, as first reported by the Times of India.
Dipak Misra J cryptically recuses self from hearing BCI age limit matter, possibly due to BCI counsel nexus
Supreme Court Justice Dipak Misra recused himself yesterday from hearing the writ petition by three petitioners, including by one Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access (IDIA) scholar who is an orphan, against the Bar Council of India (BCI) surprise resurrection of an age limit on studying law.
SC declines Bhushan writ that NaMo was paid cash: Sahara-Birla papers not enough evidence
Legally Explained: How has the SC managed to keep dodging its RTI obligations? [via Mint]
On 17 August, before it broke for a long weekend of four days, a three-judge Supreme Court (SC) bench of justices Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla Chandra Pant and AM Khanwilkar referred a challenge to its immunity from the Right to Information (RTI) Act to a five-judge constitution bench. The decision, made after a brief hearing, was a surprise as well as a disappointment.
SC consti bench to decide if SC is immune to RTI
A five-judge Constitution bench will decide whether the Supreme Court is exempted from disclosing information including file noting and correspondence on the appointment of judges to higher judiciary and other information under the Right to Information Act (RTI).
DJS exam: SC makes amazing common sense guidelines on how to avoid future DJS debacles
The Supreme Court has today issued guidelines to the Delhi high court on how to conduct future Delhi Judicial Services (DJS) exams, following a rejoinder petition by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) represented by Prashant Bhushan and co-petitioner and DJS candidate Sonal Gupta, represented by Sanjay Hegde, who both appeared pro bono in the case.
Bhushan PIL wants clinical trial results of allegedly lethal Bharat Biotech vaccine [READ PETITION]
The Supreme Court today issued notice to the Centre, the Department of Bio-Technology (DBT) and Christian Medical College, Vellore in a PIL filed by S Srinivasan seeking complete centre-wise results of the clinical trial of anti-diarrhea vaccine Rotavac.
Are cell phones bad for you? SC takes note of Bhushan PIL raising radiation science [READ PETITION]
The PIL titled Dr Naresh Chand Gupta v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) and Others (WP civil no 316/2016) was listed (as item no 23) for hearing today in court no 1 of the Supreme Court presided by CJI and Justice Khanwilker.
A history of violence: SC to hear Bhushan PIL over toothless animal cruelty laws
Prashant Bhushan, acting for the NGO Angel Trust, has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court that more stringent punishments should be levied against those convicted of cruelty against animals, particularly in the pet shops industry.
Why this aggression, be more polite, Justice Khehar asks attorney general Mukul Rohatgi
Shortly before lunch the matter of the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) appointment came up in Court 3 with Prashant Bhushan, counsel for petitioner, making the submissions of why the CVC’s appointment was dubious.
Court Cuts: When Justice Gogoi nearly lost his cool dictating because of P Bhushan's promptings
Tense moments were witnessed when Justice Ranjan Gogoi, sitting with Pinaki Chandra Ghose, was dictating order in the Supreme Court’s room 7 at 3:30pm earlier today, in the contempt petition against the Union of India, and the Delhi and Tamil Nadu Governments in the political advertisements case.
SC dismisses P Bhushan plea to cancel Reliance Jio 4G licence
Cong-BJP FCRA violation case set for interesting twist with sneaky carte-blanche-clause in Budget
Even as the two rival national political parties played April Fool of their actual political rivalries on 1 April by appealing together in the Supreme Court, a common judgment passed against them by the Delhi high court, The Wire has exposed a little-known fact, which promises to excel the incredible phenomenon of these two rival parties coming together on a common platform to fight a common enemy.
When BJP and Congress were on the same side before the Supreme Court today (facing P Bhushan)
The BJP and the Congress today both found defending themselves as appellants in a case before the Supreme Court, which is likely to hear it in detail after the summer vacation.
How Art of Living managed to circumvent the NGT ruling and could get away paying only Rs 2.5 cr, despite its open defiance
Those who thought the NGT’s 9 March insistence that the AoL pay a fine ofRs 5 crores before going ahead with the event at the disputed site ofYamuna was too mild, compared to the kind of devastation which it is likelyto cause to the site, must today concede that the NGT order “being mild”was probably an understatement. In today’s order (read below), the NGTappeared too willing to accept AoL’s offer of Rs 25 lakh now, and pay thebalance within three weeks.
Court confirms 12 additional Delhi judge interviews, hears writ re DJS 2014 mess

Judicial inquiry proves DJS exam was a massive mess: ‘most’ out of top-200 candidates’ marks increased, 12 new interviewees

Senior advocate Kamini Jaiswal writ seeks SIT & contempt vs the Patiala House three [READ PETITION]
Senior advocate Kamini Jaiswal has filed a fresh writ petition in the Supreme Court through advocate Prashant Bhushan, seeking to institute a Special Investigation Team to probe the incidents of attacks on 15 and 17 February at Patiala House court and also issue suo motu contempt proceeding against three advocates, accused of interfering in the administration of justice and for willfully violating the orders of the Supreme Court dated 17 February.
What really happened at Patiala House? Kanhaiya's lawyers call (obvious) BS on thug-vocates' 3-hour-beating boast
