AIPMT 2015 paper leak lawyer Vaibhav Choudhary explains why Monday’s SC judgment may cancel medical entrance exam

AIPMT: Shades of Grey or black and white?
AIPMT: Shades of Grey or black and white?

India’s top undergraduate medical entrance exam the CBSE All India Pre-Medical Entrance Test (AIPMT) 2015 may be cancelled on Monday after today’s observation from Supreme Court justice Amitava Roy that the sanctity of the exam had been compromised this year. Justice Roy was hearing three writs that had asked for the 3 May exam to be cancelled.

The Indian Express reported that the bench said today: “The examination stands vitiated even if one student is being benefited illegally. We are not holding CBSE guilty as such. Taking into consideration the past such incidents, CBSE ought to have been cognisant of these things. It had been happening for last two-three years.” However, solicitor general Ranjit Kumar reportedly said for CBSE: “6.3 lakh students cannot be made to take the exam afresh when only 44 students have been found involved in taking benefits through unfair means.”

The three writs (WP 298/2015, WP 299/2015 and WP 305/2015) were filed by candidates who had appeared in the exam on 3 May, praying for its result to be stayed. The original schedule for result declaration was 5 June.

Advocate Vaibhav Choudhary explained that 22 candidates were caught cheating at various centres across the country on the date of the exam and were handed over to the police which has now, through its investigation, found 24 more such candidates, as also reported in papers.

Choudhary, who is appearing with senior advocates Jaideep Singh and Rajiv Gupta for the 21 petitioners who have filed one of the writs, told Legally India that Rohtak inspector general Shrikanth Jadhav filed the police investigation report in court today stating that although 43 candidates had so far been apprehended for use of unfair means, this number was not conclusive.

The IG’s report details the modus operandi of the cheaters. Candidates in the examination hall took snapshots of the question paper at 1030am – the minute the test commenced - and sent these over instant messaging service Whatsapp, to a person sitting in Behror, Rajasthan who solved the paper and then distributed, through Whatsapp, the answers along with the answer key to all candidates who had prepaid for this service. The police have retrieved more than 300 SIM cards which were used in the process, and have identified around 10 states in the exam centres of which candidates had cheated.

Choudhary added that the IG also submitted in court today that the mastermind behind the paper leak was the 2011 AIIMS entrance paper leak accused Ravi Attri as had been reported by Express. Attri had masterminded the 2011 leak in the same manner as the AIPMT leak.

Senior advocate Singh today advised the court that it may follow the order and guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in the 2011 AIIMS case.

The IG told the court that the investigation could go on for months, even years, and draw up more candidates who had cheated in the 3 May exam, yet the number could never be said to be conclusive.

Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, who was appearing for the CBSE alongside additional solicitor general Pinky Anand, asked the court to cancel the result of the 46 candidates who had been caught so far but to not cancel the entire exam as it will take not less than four months for the CBSE to organize a re-exam.

However the petitioners submitted instances of re-tests for major competitive exams such as that of the Aligarh Muslim University this year, or the 2004 AIPMT exam, organised in a shorter period.

The vacation bench of justices RK Agrawal and Amitava Roy observed that the sanctity of the entire exam had been compromised due to the impossibility of the police coming up with a conclusive list of candidates who had cheated the 3 May exam.

The bench will pronounce its judgment in the case on Monday (15 June).

Comments

Admirer 12 Jun 2015, 09:10
+5 -0
Go vaibhav!
raj 12 Jun 2015, 10:26
+7 -2
re test is must , un sare dreams k liye jo har student ne dekhe hai ,...
ye cbse valle sahi main bavde ho gaye hai ,..
inko yeh chinta hai ki 3 month lagengey sab arrangements main .., par iski chinta nahin hai ki kitne jane illegal doctor bannenge jo inka bhi ilaaj karengey ,.. jo desh ka naam dubayengey , apni izzat k liye to nahin , but apne nation ki PRIDE k liye re -test is must
surjitkdr 12 Jun 2015, 10:43
+4 -1
Had then kingpin of AIIMS leak been brought to justice we might not have lived to see this day. Our justice delivery system needs to be changed.
Mallika Das 12 Jun 2015, 10:44
+5 -2
It would be unfair if aipmt is not reconducted for those students who are not a part of the mass cheating.. According to CBSE results should be declared but that would hugely affect the placements of the deserving students..
Geetika 12 Jun 2015, 11:21
+5 -0
Even the UP CPMT entrance got leaked and no action has been taken yet. It too is saying that there was no leak even when they themselves know that there was. Now the result has also been declared 15 days prior to the the tentative date. It simply indicates all the corrupt system.
Can there be any way to highlight it in the media?
Abhishek 12 Jun 2015, 11:51
+2 -0
how could cbse tells that only 47 student involve in cheating later it says about 700 students involved and even before cbse officially says that NO PAPER leackage.. its bullshit.. cbse arrange exam and even arrange way for cheaters.. cancel the exam retest it..
Manoj 12 Jun 2015, 11:52
+5 -2
The cheating will affect only those candidates who have scored over the cut off marks, as they may secure a lower rank with respect to the 'cheaters'. Hence a retest for all is not necessary nor justifiable. CBSE should declare the results and then conduct an online retest for candidates who have secured above the cut off marks. This will ensure a manageable number of candidates for the online test. Also an online test will have the advantage of reduced unfair practices, quick result compilation and declaration.
kesav 12 Jun 2015, 13:03
+1 -4
It is true that conducting re-examination for more than 6.5 lakhs students is a difficult task for any organisation. CBSE is right in expressing their difficulty. The following could be a solution. Identify a cut off for each category as is done every year. Allow all students above this cut off to write the re-examination. Call it AIPMT ( advanced) & conduct the examination online. The number of candidates taking this examination will not be more than 25,000. The examination can be conducted in July & CBSE can announce the results within a week ( because it is online). Give fifty percentage weighting for AIPMT ( Main - the exam that is over) & fifty percentage for AIPMT ( advanced). All the cheaters will be out & the best candidates will be selected provided there is no cheating the second time.
rajesh kumar lodha 12 Jun 2015, 14:47
+0 -3
it is not good idia to recounduct aipmt again like rpmt
lhingkhonei mate 12 Jun 2015, 15:06
+1 -1
Conducting examination again for students above cut off after declaration of the result may come out to be a better solution this means avoiding 2nd chance to losers and filtering the cheaters too!!!
debasis 12 Jun 2015, 17:59
+4 -0
[s]conducting a re-exam for the ones who cleared the cutoff is kind a..giving a privilege to the cheaters itself...wow...lol...one more benefit of cheating by throwing out the honest students...????????#bhai India me sab chalta hai...[/s]
Guest 12 Jun 2015, 18:13
+3 -0
Plz don't play with our future. Plz re conduct the exammm plzzzzz. Because of few cheaters plz don't spoil our future.plzzzzzz
anp 13 Jun 2015, 02:54
+0 -0
iT SEEMS TO BE THAT ANY RELATIVE OF Solicitor General Ranjit Kumars HAD GONE FOR AIPMT EXAM. HE MIGHT BE NOT AWARE THAT FOR 15% SEATS ARE ONLY APPROX 2000. SAYING STOP OF 46 STUDENT ONLY.HE IS LAW QUALIFIED MUST BE AWARE ABOUT LEAKAGE OF INFORMATION LAW UNDER JURISPRUDENCE ACT AND VARIOUS LEGAL ETHICS. DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY CBSE ARGUES TO SC FOR NOT RE CONDUCTING THE EXAM.I THINK THERE IS SOME MISCHIEF. HONORABLE SC KNOWS EVERY THING AFTER RE CONDUCTING EXAM THE ALL AGENCY WHO IS IN OPPOSITION OF NOT TO RE CONDUCT THE EXAM MAY BE UNDER TRIAL INCLUDING SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THIS COUNTRY.HRD MINISTER SHOULD IMMEDIATELY INTERFERE IN THIS REGARD.CBSE PRESENTLY THE COUNTRY RUN BY HONEST PM. IN THIS REGARD BIHAR (BCECE) MUST LEARN THE LESSON FROM KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY REALY HERE TRANSPARENT AND HONESTLY. IN BIHAR STUDENT NEITHER THE QUESTION PAPER NOR OMR SHEET IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE STUDENT. EVERY THING IS IN DARK. GOD SAVE THIS COUNTRY.
padmini 13 Jun 2015, 04:38
+1 -0
cbse is right . all cheaters become afraid to join.re exam is not a good choice for those who performed well. Is sc can give guarantee to them . think . Good performer students are out of stress . But after hearing the news they are stressed and anxious. Most private medical colleges calculate this and they started admission counselling and told students to deposit original mark sheets on counselling day. they are fishing
Ayu 13 Jun 2015, 11:48
+0 -3
Re-test is not a choice. SC and CBSE should think of other option for fair admission.
Next level screening option for those aspirants who are above a cut off, may be opted to filter the cheaters, instead of re-conducting test of 6.3 lacs aspirants.
padmini 13 Jun 2015, 12:23
+0 -2
ban the result of the leaked states and publish result. give chance to leaked state as CBT then the problem solved . it will take one week. You know, in election if there any booth capture like irregularities the election not cancelled only captured booth face re election, the same thing here we need
anon 13 Jun 2015, 15:28
+0 -1
the reconduct of examination is not a good idea. for some people like me, whose paper went well, the idea of reconduct may deduct my chance of getting a seat in a government college. its a request to declare the results soon or the stress would take a toll on each candidates forcing them to take wrong steps.
Shivank 13 Jun 2015, 17:55
+3 -0
the judgement of reconduct is gud !! we cant risk the potentioal of that child who studied noght and day !! and we don't know how many are free moving and are culprits!! SC should announce the retest !! its ony the fair means!and ONLY THE JUSTICE WITH STUDENTS!!
Guest 15 Jun 2015, 06:40
+0 -0
I wud say padmini is right
JoeKidd 17 Jun 2015, 08:20
+0 -0
It is quite a sad situation. Lots of hardworking kids who celebrated success will end up again having to go thru the same fire they went thru earlier. Tension can build up in their young minds.

I wonder, if the authorities could not ensure that there was no cheating the first time, how will they be able to ensure that there is no cheating the second time?