BCI calls young judicial officers ‘incapable, inept, impolite’, vows to fight for 3-year-min practice before judges’ exam

BCI has a new idea
BCI has a new idea

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has announced its intention of banning fresh law graduates from joining the judicial services directly and instead making them slog it out in the courts for three years first.

Live Law had first tweeted the BCI press release, noting:

Bar Council of India to move Supreme Court seeking modification of the order allowing fresh law graduates to become judicial officers. “Judicial officers not having practical experience at the bar are mostly found to be incapable and inept at handling matters”, BCI says.

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) Sun, 03 Jan 2021, 08:16

The BCI in its 2 January 2021 press release, signed by secretary Srimanto Sen, the BCI also said that judges “not having practical experience at the Bar are mostly found to be incapable and inept in handling matters”.

The BCI continues:

Most of such officers are found impolite and impractical in their behaviour with the Members of the Bar and Litigants. They have lack of understanding of the aspirations and expectations of Advocates and Litigants in the matter of proper and decent behavior.

Is insulting the honourable junior judges not contempt of court? Who are we to say.

But the Supreme Court may get its say now, as the BCI has vowed to file an application before it to modify a 2002 order that had removed the previous three-year-practice restriction on taking the judicial services exam.

In some ways, perhaps the BCI is right: in an ideal world, all judges would have first seen the cut-and-thrust of litigation from the wrong side of the bench before ascending to it.

But the practical concerns against the BCI’s arguments are several:

  • the pendency of cases has continued rising non-stop in recent years, to which more and better judges may be one of the few effective long-term solutions.
  • judicial services exams have become an increasingly popular career choice amongst fresh law graduates, including at national law and other top universities, where graduates could have chosen to join the bar or law firms.
  • law firms won’t be able to absorb those law graduates, since the sector is tiny.
  • the first years at the bar are very hard for most freshers, unless you are well-off or have a godfather/mother in the profession, since many of the more senior lawyers at the bar don’t pay (much or at all) and the financial support provided by the bar councils is minimal.
  • if one were to be particularly cynical, the BCI and state bar counsels seem like they’re pitching for placing all future judges under their jurisdiction for three years before allowing them to ‘escape’ and lord it over them from the bench.

Comments

Guest 4 Jan 2021, 07:59
+21 -1
BCI is a failed institution.

It should have first thought of doing something about the 4 crore pending cases in indian courts.

Judicial system has collapsed in India.

We all are in a big mess because criminals know that pendency is not going away from next 500 years.
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 10:05
+8 -0
My blood boils.
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 10:10
+12 -0
Manan misra ji is on a trip of his own. I like this fellow. Every once in a while he pops up to eventually fade away.
Stinker 5 Jan 2021, 15:07
+2 -0
You mean poops up, raises a stink which then fades away...
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 08:20
+22 -5
This is a backlash by thuggish lawyers from obscure colleges against grads from elite law schools cracking the judicial service exam.
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 08:27
+20 -2
This will worry NLUD and NALSAR a lot. These two law schools have a very good record in judicial services exams and their students often aspire to be judicial officers. Another segment that will be worried are SC/ST/OBC students across all law schools, since they have reservations in public sector jobs and usually try for those jobs. Indeed, one way to counter-attack the BCI is to say that this will put SC/ST/OBC students at a disadvantage. No government will dare approve such a move.
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 10:06
+8 -0
[quote]Indeed, one way to counter-attack the BCI is to say that this will put SC/ST/OBC students at a disadvantage. No government will dare approve such a move.[/quote]


So true.
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 08:33
+9 -10
NLU student associations cannot sit idle and watch Manan Mishra reduce their job opportunities. They must submit a petition to the CJI and President of India condemning the BCI. Also, both the CLAT Consortium and NLU student associations should demand that paper-setting in judicial services exams be based on NLU curriculum and be outsourced to NLUs.
TrevorThinks 5 Jan 2021, 05:05
+6 -2
NLU curriculum, cause all the law schools in the country are NLUs? [img]https://media3.giphy.com/media/xT9DPJVjlYHwWsZRxm/200.gif[/img]
BuddyBuddyBuddy 5 Jan 2021, 05:16
+1 -2
Elitist much, buddy?
Guest 4 Jan 2021, 08:40
+12 -0
Ravi Shankar Prasad must be kicked out in the next cabinet reshuffle and Manan Mishra must follow his guru. The legal profession cannot be continuously held hostage by a lobby from just one state, and that too a state that is the most economically and socially backward in India. Other states must have a say and more distinguished lawyers must also have a say.
Wow 4 Jan 2021, 10:00
+11 -0
That's rich, coming from BCI. I am totally in favour of doing something to make sure that judges are at least half competent. I am a Big 6 lawyer and I have a personal case going on in a district level court (non-metro). The systemic rot their is an epidemic. But what BCI is suggesting has nothing to do with that. It is either (collective) personal grudge, or something else, something personal, where BCI wants to settle a score.
Ghalib 4 Jan 2021, 15:27
+26 -0
"Incapable, Inept, Impolite." Well, what about the BCI officers themselves? Despite loads of experience, they still have these qualities.

[i]Umar bhar Ghalib yahi bhool karta raha - dhool chehre pe thi, aur aaina saaf karta raha.[/i]
kuch bhi bc-i 5 Jan 2021, 07:34
+7 -1
how will the 3 year rule be ensured? what is stopping me from sitting at home for 3 years and then appearing. will it not be discriminatory towards in-house counsel/ purely transactional lawyers and the likes, if practice is only recognized as going to courts. also, no guarantee that after 3 years someone will magically be a rockstar judge.
Guest 5 Jan 2021, 10:35
+1 -1
Being a law graduate theory knowledge is compulsory getting experience for three years from bar council is for judiciary exam is making the younger generation not to select the law course .after finishing mbbs one can practise as a doctor by running clinic but what about law . As a law student parent i am against this when my ward settle in life year after year they are going to get practical experience . Why not bar council accept the student from first year to practice with them.
Guest 6 Jan 2021, 08:27
+1 -0
According to the new BCI notification, none of these people have recognised LLM degrees and cannot be admitted to the PhD. This should make the TLC trolls commenting here very happy.
Guest 6 Jan 2021, 10:48
+0 -0
Not really. Even the new norms don't apply retrospectively.
Grudge 12 Jan 2021, 15:03
+1 -0
The timing makes me feel it is in the wake of Mr. Venkatesh's petition. Looks like they want a teach a lesson to young grads, challenging the mighty.