Indira Jaising to law min: Can women be on govt lit panels only with godmothers?

India’s first woman additional solicitor general Indira Jaising wrote to the law minister Ashwini Kumar criticising the government’s decision to drop several “competent” woman lawyers from the panel of advocates for handling government litigation in the Supreme Court.

She also wrote to chief justice of India Altamas Kabir requesting for the provision of crèche facilities in the Supreme Court for the toddlers of practicing women lawyers.

Excerpts from Jaising’s letter to Kumar:

This can only send a very wrong message to the (legal) profession as a whole and to women in particular that there is no place for them in the profession. Even otherwise, the perception among people is that only those with powerful godfathers or godmothers (of which there may be very few) can progress in the profession

Several women I know who have assisted me competently have been dropped from the panels with no notice or appreciable reason

I recognize that ‘merit’ and ‘competence’ must be the guiding principles in making appointments and selection, but it is a matter of common knowledge that ‘merit’ itself is not a neutral word but a social construct, which tends to entrench the privilege of the privileged. [TOI]

Comments

Justice League 13 Dec 2012, 10:31
+0 -0
"This can only send a very wrong message to the (legal) profession as a whole and to women in particular that there is no place for them in the profession."

...Said India’s first woman Additional Solicitor General

Hypocrisy or ignorance?
srg 13 Dec 2012, 11:10
+0 -0
THERE ARE HARDLY ANY ORGANISATIONS IN INDIA THAT CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS REPUTED IN ALL RESPECTS. IF THEY EXCELL IN THEIR PRACTICE THEY ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN SAME IN OTHER SECTORS. SO IT APPLIES EQUALLY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS. DON'T THINK ANYONE IS COMPETENT PURELY ON MERITS AND ANYONE HAS COME UP ON THEIR OWN INDEPENDENTLY. YET TO SEE SUCH PERSON OR WOMAN WHO MAY HAVE COME UP TOTALLY ON HER/HIS OWN.
what nonsense 13 Dec 2012, 12:09
+0 -0
Hey Indira ji, if you are really concerned about women lawyers then push for wealthy senior advocates (including yourself) to pay better wages to their young juniors, a big chunk of whom are young women law grads. This is the number one problem plaguing the legal sector and this forces bright people to join sweatshops like Amarchand.
Darth 14 Dec 2012, 00:50
+0 -0
[quote name="what nonsense"]Hey Indira ji, if you are really concerned about women lawyers then push for wealthy senior advocates (including yourself) to pay better wages to their young juniors, a big chunk of whom are young women law grads. This is the number one problem plaguing the legal sector and this forces bright people to join sweatshops like Amarchand.[/quote]

Totally agree with this. It's incomprehensible why these fat cats, hippos, chimpanzees and buffalos who earn more in two conferences / appearances than even an amarchand lawyer earns in a month (or a young practitioner earns in a year) cannot pay their juniors a respectable salary. Thats more important to man or woman lawyer alike rather than creches for toddlers in court.

What say you ms jaising ?
* 14 Dec 2012, 11:54
+0 -0
Abey Kian go and ask her man!
publicity gimmicks 15 Dec 2012, 15:30
+0 -0
Ms. Indira Jaising is upto her usual publicity gimmicks! It is such wanton attention-seeking attitude which will actually give women lawyers a bad name...