Madras writ hearing v foreign firms bogged down by court delays

clock-eternal-by-RobbertvanderSteeg
clock-eternal-by-RobbertvanderSteeg

The Chennai public interest litigation (PIL) against 31 foreign law firms that was scheduled for Government respondents’ filing of replies on 8 April remains unheard to date owing to judicial delays.

The case was postponed for hearing on 9 April as item no 84 after post lunch matters were not taken up by the bench on the previous day.

The matter did not come up for hearing due to shortage of time on that day.

This Monday 12 April, after the weekend holidays no matters were listed before the concerned bench sitting in court number 1.

The last the cause list placed the case as number 86 on Tuesday 13 April.

14 April was a gazetted holiday and the courts were closed.

The hearing was not listed for today and did not show up for tomorrow, according to the Madras High Court causelist.

The lead petitioner of the writ petition A K Balaji told Legally India: “Delays have been caused because there are a lot of pending matters before the court.”

“Only admissions are taken up but not adjourned admissions,” he added, explaining that the Association of Indian Lawyers, which was formed for the purpose of filing the writ petition, was also waiting for the matter to be heard but did not know when this would happen.

The writ petition names 31 international firms and legal process outsourcing (LPO) provider Integreon as co-respondents for practising law illegally in India.

It is understood that respondents other than Government departments and statutory bodies would not be served with notices until after the matter has been admitted in a preliminary hearing.

Photo by Robert van der Steeg

Comments

Anonymous guest 15 Apr 2010, 23:33
+0 -0
Leave alone foreign lawyers, even foreign judges should be permitted. That may help in reducing the delay.
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 00:06
+0 -0
Hopefully, the instant writ petition will also take a decade for disposal like the Lawyers Collective matter. Interesting, isnt i.
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 00:18
+0 -0
It'll take another 20 years to be heard! i wanna pack my bags and leave the corrupt, uncivilised, smelly, dirt-poor, fractious, polluted third world sh*thole country that is india and go abroad.

a medieval, slumdog country like india does not deserve foreign law firms. perhaps the uk firms can operate from sri lanka. it's a much better, cleaner, more educated country and the operating costs are much lower than in singapore. besides, they will welcome foreign law firms with open arms.
kianganz 16 Apr 2010, 00:31
+0 -0
Hold on, it's not like much of the warmongering/economy-busting/bigoted/near-totalitarian "first world" is paradise...

And in the UK the weather is atrocious.

Every place has its problems and India is better than many, in my humble opinion.
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 01:12
+0 -0
Yipee Kian...way to go
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 01:20
+0 -0
@3 it should be the other way round....your corrupt, uncivilised, smelly, dirt-poor, fractious, polluted sh*thole should be kicked out of this country. You seriously don't deserve to be here.
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 16:15
+0 -0
@3, if u have any principles, stand by ur word, pack ur bags and leave this very instant!! india does not need garbage like u, ur departure will help clean up the country.

n whether india deserves foreign firms or not is irrelevant. The foreign firms are falling all over themselves in their attempts to enter india, legally or surreptitiously, its not india which is which is begging them to enter. so the question should be whether foreign firms deserve to enter india, and not the other way round. So ur comments lack a foundation not only in civility and courteousness, but also pure logic based on facts.
Anonymous guest 16 Apr 2010, 17:27
+0 -0
In light of #3‘s comments, would my learned Indian brethren still root for foreign law firms and their best friends to enter into the country. In other words, should the judiciary, an organ of the constitution of free India remain the sole domain of its citizens and nationals or should the goras who were booted out in 1947 again be allowed to practice over here.

To my mind, the composition of the judiciary, legislature and the executive is sacrosanct and should always comprise Indians. I know we have a lot of people comprising the above organs who are thoroughly corrupt, lazy and inadequate leaders. Nonetheless, it is better to serve under a master coming from your fold then overseas.
Anonymous guest 17 Apr 2010, 15:44
+0 -0
Plzz somebody tell me more bout this writ pettion....... if we r over with discussing absurd issues........ to what extent these 31 respondents r liable...... and what r the laws which might hold them guilty........