SC Sathasivam and Khehar factor in gender, family lineage to confirm death sentence

Supreme Court judges P Sathasivam and JS Khehar yesterday justified awarding the death penalty to the murderer of a seven-year-old boy, on the ground of his gender among other “aggravating circumstances”. Killing the sole male child of a family meant the lineage could not be carried forward, reported the Times of India.

The bench said:

The parents of the deceased had four children — three daughters and one son. Kidnapping the only male child was to induce maximum fear in the mind of his parents. Purposefully killing the sole male child has grave repercussions for the parents of the deceased…

Agony for parents for the loss of their male child, who would have carried further the family lineage, and is expected to see them through their old age, is unfathomable. Extreme misery caused to the aggrieved party certainly adds to the aggravating circumstances.

The accused lured the victim, whom he knew, away after school under some pretext, kidnapped him and called his house for ransom. After a delay in being provided the money he strangled the boy stuffed him in a gunny bag and dumped him in a water tank.

Comments

Confused 6 Feb 2013, 14:56
+10 -0
It is surprising how the SC does not realize the fact that it being gender insensitive. The fight for gender equality seriously weakens when our apex court judges decide to factor in "maleness" and the loss of lineage as an aggravating factor
Guest 7 Feb 2013, 04:02
+10 -0
Thus logically meaning that had one of the female child been kidnapped, the agony of the parents would have been far diminished!
SC judge or Khap Panchayat? 7 Feb 2013, 11:15
+0 -0
Our judges, policemen etc are not aliens, they are product of the society we live in. Would be very interested in seeing the CJI's reaction to this judgment, who wanted to join the Delhi rape protesters.