Are judgments too long and wordy? The SC thinks so...

“The judges are serious about rendering speedy justice to litigants. In most cases, the law has already been succinctly laid down and does not require further arguments to delay a verdict. Those cases need to be decided fast with crisp judgments focusing only on facts in the backdrop of the already laid down law,” a Supreme Court source told the Times of India.

The paper reported that SC judges have been “informally circulating” the message to keep judgments short and sweet under the new Chief Justice of India (CJI) HL Dattu, who is also (as pretty much every other CJI before him) trying to find ways of tackling the pendency problem.

Comments

Lawyer 3 Nov 2014, 11:28
+0 -0
A source in SC told Dhananjay Mahapatra what judges talk? Is he on his way to repeat the threat for contempt?
P M Ravindran 5 Nov 2014, 00:07
+0 -0
In reality what happens in court is that both the prosecution and defence presents certain facts, quotes certain laws and case laws justifying of those facts. In such a context the judge can as well toss a coin to decide which side he should favour and copy that side's laws and case laws to support his judgement. So what is required in the judgement is not laws and case laws supporting the judgement but how the laws and case laws quoted by the opposite party is not pertinent!