Dear Court Witness ji: My senior’s still paying me peanuts while my litigation career continues moving sideways

“At Supreme Court for three years under a kind senior but he’s still paying me peanuts and not giving me any great work. At a loss…”

Dear Witness ji,

I have been practising in litigation at the Supreme Court for three years now under a kind senior but he’s still paying me peanuts and not giving me any great work.

I love the courts and want to stay in litigation, but I feel like I’m stagnating in my career and am at a loss as to what to do or how to improve matters.

Yours,

Stuckinarut

Court Witness says: 'Run'.
Court Witness says: 'Run'.
Dear Stuckinarut,

Run. Run for your life.

Your sweet but underpaying boss will never, ever let you go, and will find new and innovative ways of emotional blackmail to keep you working for him for peanuts.

Forever.

You have three choices depending on how much you like taking orders from others:

1. Join the litigation team of a law firm that doesn’t regularly feed its junior associates to Delhi Zoo’s tigers (too soon?)

2. Join a younger-ish lawyer who’ll give you more exposure and more opportunity to build your practice.

3. Are you doing enough to build your own practice? He might not give you anything with meat on it but on the bright side, that means you’re a free agent. And if he’s at least moderately respected, you can namedrop his name to at least open some doors to you.

In the meantime, you can drink from his fount of eternal legal wisdom and put his cases on the low-burner, as you shamelessly badger your existing friends, family and contacts for all it’s worth to get your first independent matters, even if it’s in a district court in [gulp] Ghaziabad.

Network, network, network - that’s the only way more people will know a) you exist and b) you’re a lawyer.

Drop your cards, give a knowing smile and a slightly desperate sounding “Do get in touch with me if you need anything.” Then deliver on it and kick serious ass in court.

Sooner or later, your practice will grow, bit by tiny bit. And while you won’t make a killing anytime soon, you will be inching your way closer to glorious independence, bit by bit, one glorious day.

All of this is secondary of course. The first, most important thing to do is: RUN!!

Yours,

Court Witness

What do you think Stuckinarut can do, other than run?

Court Witness is an advocate of the Supreme Court of India and tweets at @courtwitness1, whenever not counselling those younger and less fortunate. If you have a question about your litigation career or lack thereof for CW, please email .

Comments

9 28 Oct 2014, 09:08
+5 -9
This is a very depressing piece. This will dishearten future aspirants. The language is not encouraging but discouraging.
grumpy parrot 28 Oct 2014, 09:31
+1 -0
Which are these firms in Delhi who are good in litigation? Besides the big law firms, are there any young firms who are really good in litigation and pays some respectable amount to survive in Delhi?
DBS 28 Oct 2014, 10:11
+2 -2
Karanjawala & Co. i guess.
In Mumbai , all the old 4 are strong in Litigation!
Lord Denning 28 Oct 2014, 11:46
+2 -0
Dear Witness (ji) !, typical chamber litigation language.. ! Well written
Blah 28 Oct 2014, 13:14
+0 -0
He is not a "kind senior" if he is still paying you "peanuts".
Been there, done that 28 Oct 2014, 14:23
+1 -1
There are many lawyers who claim to be the highest paymasters in the country and are far from kind, in many ways more than one. We live with the choices we make.

[quote name="Blah"]He is not a "kind senior" if he is still paying you "peanuts".[/quote]
Scooty 28 Oct 2014, 13:26
+0 -0
Dear Stuckinarut, thank your lucky stars for the peanuts that you get from your senior. Many seniors don't even give that.
self starter 28 Oct 2014, 17:22
+2 -0
dear stuckinarut, 3 years of exp in SC is a great experience dear. you are a privileged person to have this kind of experience. some don't get to see SC even after 10 years of their practice. to get on your own it needs a decision from your side and then you have to stick to that decision. you may be knowing enough seniors by now. all you have to do is talk to them of the case and seek help. senior associates do help and guide adequately. i wouldn't suggest that you believe what your senior associate tell.s i would say, after the associate guides you, it becomes your duty to go and read whatever was suggested. only when you feel satisfied should you go ahead with the suggestion. this is how you start as a beginner. its certainly not easy but when you make money and feel happy about it you tend to perform better and put more efforts. when you get peanuts you don't perform better. before you get into depression please start making contacts with senior associates on whom you can rely upon before leaving your present boss.
Name 29 Oct 2014, 05:57
+0 -1
Baby doll main sone ki!
JRD 29 Oct 2014, 06:03
+0 -0
This is also the fate of so many of Mumbai's young lawyers especially those who work for not so well known Seniors. For the first 2-3 years they are very useful to their Seniors in this "Tareekh pe tareekh" culture, and the only time they stand before a a Judge/Magistrate is to get a 'date' when their Senior cannot be present. Such is life in India's courts, buddy, all I can offer is my sympathies. The bright side though is that I think the public has got totally fed up with this court culture and I believe that things may change over the next 10 years, and that you will soon have access to good legal work and get paid reasonably well, whether you are working for a senior or a law firm or you are on your own. So let's say cheers to that.
Brazilnut 30 Oct 2014, 04:16
+9 -0
Dear stuckinarut,

There is option 4:
Put a notice in the newspaper legally changing your surname to Sibal.