Government not really bothered about CLAT either way, it tells SC

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) is of no interest to the government, submitted the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) in the Supreme Court yesterday, in response to Shamnad Basheer’s challenge to the conduct of CLAT by national law universities (NLUs).

In his writ praying for the establishment of a permanent CLAT body of experts which will take over the mandate to conduct the exam from the 17 NLUs, Basheer had impleaded the central government through the MHRD

The MHRD stated in its 26 October affidavit:

“MHRD was never involved in the aforesaid CLAT examination. However,the comments of University Grants Commission, the apex body regulating higher education in the country, are that CLAT is a non-statutory body brought into existence by 17 NLUs through an instrument of MoU ”

“Conducting entrance examination for admission into programmes of study is an internal matter of the university which is autonomous to devise any such mechanism with the approval of its competent councils in the interest of quality and standard of education. UGC does not interfere with universities in such matters. The NLU conducting the CLAT examination for a particular year is responsible for a free and fair conduct of examination.”

“Hence it is submitted before the Hon’ble Court that the Union of India through secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development is not concerned with the CLAT ”

Basheer had also made the Bar Council of India (BCI) a party to his writ. After the SC fined the BCI Rs 25,000 for failing to file a response in the writ, the BCI responded last month and argued that the mandate to conduct CLAT should be handed over to the BCI on the alleged ground that the regulator had conducted the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) in a “most fair and transparent manner”.

Government response

Comments

Guest 28 Oct 2016, 08:40
+0 -0
I don't know what to say!
Two Chillars Opinion 28 Oct 2016, 14:03
+9 -1
Shamnad made a false move there, involving the BCI in this. It can turn out to be the proverbial riding the tiger scenario now that the latter has tasted blood to ruin another examination all over again. MHRD was bound to shed responsibility at the earliest opportunity. Most of the lower-rank NLUs won't let a chance to make some quick bucks by hosting CLAT and in the process, this examination has at present become one of the worst ways to judge aptitude of a potential law student, merely pandering to coaching rackets.
Guest 29 Oct 2016, 16:51
+2 -5
Agreed. Shamnad should learn to mind his now business. And if he had to file a PIL he should have filed it against NLUD seeing its inclusion in CAT, against NSLIU/NALSAR/NUJS etc for faulty faculty recruitment and corruption, and against the new NLUs for being glorified cowsheds.
insider 6 Nov 2016, 16:27
+0 -0
Asking Shamnad to mind his own business - asking pigs to fly would have been easier. He takes up one of these "causes" and tries to inject his twisted logic in the form of PIL's etc. God save the IP world.
insider 6 Nov 2016, 16:29
+0 -0
Yeah I think the LSAT is a better indicator.