Janhavi Gadkar bail adjourned as defence may rely on medical care & condition

The bail hearing of Reliance Industries in-house counsel Janhavi Gadkar, who is accused of driven while drunk and killing two men, was adjourned in the Kurla metropolitan magistrate’s court yesterday to 25 June amidst arguments between counsel.

Advocate Dimple Shah, representing Gadkar, had argued that they needed access to the treatment records Gadkar had received in hospital for a fractured hand to ascertain whether she had received the correct medical care, reported Mid Day. Her bail application would rely on the medical report, Shah told the court.

Public prosecutor Prahlad Mahajan told the defence to argue for bail immediately, rather than asking for another adjournment.

The Mumbai Mirror reported that after examination in prison by an orthopaedic surgeon on 15 June, where she complained of pain in “upper left abdomen, left hand, rib region and drowsiness”, Gadkar was taken to JJ Hospital on 17 June, where she was diagnosed with a fractured wrist without normal chest X-Ray and ECG results.

Mahajan said that the defence should file a written application asking for adjournment, and that the medical care she had received was sufficient.

Comments

Avent 23 Jun 2015, 10:58
+3 -1
if she had a good set of lawyers, she would have been out by now!!!

I really doubt if she's as rich as most of us believe her to be.
Lawman 23 Jun 2015, 12:59
+1 -2
She had an Audi. Need I say more?
DBS 23 Jun 2015, 16:45
+3 -2
agreed that an Audi is an Audi but that Q3 had wheel caps & not even proper alloys which means it was the cheapest variant. But still should be 30lakh +
JLD 24 Jun 2015, 04:53
+0 -0
Hahahaa Q3 had wheel caps and not even proper alloys. Haha
Confused Zeus Says . . . . 24 Jun 2015, 05:18
+2 -0
Wow - you did a chemical analysis of the wheel caps to determine her financial status?
Scooter- 23 Jun 2015, 13:59
+5 -6
audi from alimony
Seema Sapra 24 Jun 2015, 05:19
+5 -2
More on my earlier comments on how the severe intoxication leading to mental impairment defence could help Janjavi Gadkar against the cuplpable homicide charge. I would go so far as to say that there is an arguable case that with a BAC of 0.2, Gadkar could not be attributed the knowledge that her driving in that condition 'was likely to cause death'.

Some useful decisions

Mukesh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 August, 2002
Equivalent citations: JT 2002 (6) SC 310 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1809092/

Shankar Jaiswara vs State Of West Bengal on 30 January, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006 (2) CHN 210 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/795385/

Supreme Court of India
Basdev vs The State Of Pepsu on 17 April, 1956
Equivalent citations: 1956 AIR 488, 1956 SCR 363

Sahadevan vs State Of Kerala on 16 March, 2010 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1953087/
No Thanks 24 Jun 2015, 18:15
+0 -4
You are sick. If what u r saying is true then this maniac lady should be immediately hanged. Otherwise she will be again back on the streets with a BAC of 0.2. do u even realise how pathetic u are.
Seema Sapra 25 Jun 2015, 03:23
+4 -0
Actually this lady would not have been on the street driving a car with a BAC of 0.2 if the Reliance CFO had not helped her to and into the car.
Seema Sapra 24 Jun 2015, 05:44
+7 -1
Gadkar appears well-off with a good salary, maybe with savings etc, able to afford to buy an Audi, maybe on a loan, maybe otherwise. She's unattached, no dependents, so her salary is hers to spend on herself.

But she is certainly not as wealthy as Salman Khan, the Nandas, Harish Salve, Ambani etc. She does not appear wealthy enough to manipulate the system easily, especially when more powerful interests might want to deflect attention away from the CFO aspect. Her mother was a BEST employee and is now an advisor to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation.

She probably does not have crores to spare lying in her bank account or black money stashed somewhere, or property investments all over.

Gadkar should be careful with who she selects as a lawyer too. Too me it looks she is not getting the best legal defence and her ability to pay lawyer fees is not the reason.
Dazed and Confused 24 Jun 2015, 06:44
+4 -1
Very apt suspicion about the legal counsel she is receiving. Gadkar is a recent recruit and not a long-standing member of the corporate family - they will almost certainly cut her off before she has a chance to cause any injury to more valuable corporate servants, such as the CFO.

This position was supposed to be the group's first "real" lawyer, a more professional transition from the old-timey guy who, according to Reliance and BP HR, is loyal but not really fit for modern commerce(something BP has advised the company about much of the group's upper echelons.)

The incumbent lawyer successfully downgraded the newbie's slot, and she probably damaged the whole modernization effort by turning out to be a booze-fueled killer (She had booze, and has certainly killed, Kian. The question is culpability, not her actions.)

She hardly had an academic or professional background equal to the task in the first place. BP's HR effort to advise Reliance on upgrading its upper echelon could be quite a disaster if Gadkar is on par with the rest of the hires. The clueless, pompous Brit BP sent from Houston HR for the legal hiring process should be chastened...but probably isn't. He's that kind of guy, and BP is that kind of company. And so is Reliance.
new recruit 24 Jun 2015, 07:28
+0 -0
@ dazed & confused : how about beginning a legal career at a junior level in RIL-Oil & Gas Division ?
Guest 24 Jun 2015, 11:35
+2 -1
This is not as stupid a strategy as it seems. Defence is laying the groundwork to ask for her to be shifted to hospital for judicial custody in the even bail is denied. That makes a big difference.

Bail is no biggie. She'll probably go home in a month at most even without Jethmalani & co.

Bigger issue is to ensure she gets a conviction with a long sentence.