Nalsar students & admin step up to deal with open letter alleging campus sexual assault

Nalsar figures out how to deal with an open letter that has opened a rather complex can of worms
Nalsar figures out how to deal with an open letter that has opened a rather complex can of worms

The Nalsar Hyderabad student bar council (SBC) has issued an official statement on the alleged campus sexual harassment and assault that was first revealed in an anonymous open letter published on the Facebook page of The Nalsar Community. The post has since gone viral and been picked up by some non-legal media.

The SBC impressed the importance of respecting the “choice and consent of the aggrieved in choosing to approach the appropriate forums”, while also requesting vice chancellor Faizan Mustafa not to “roll back or compromise” on the liberal environment prevailing on campus by introducing “outdated regressive rules”.

SBC president is Yugal Jain told us that the vice chancellor had been very supportive and that there was no suggestion that the university would introduce regressive rules. The statement, he explained, was merely precautionary, in case external pressure would force the college’s hand to institute stricter norms.

The statement added that the SBC would seek to foster “discussion and sensitization” on campus over the issue.

Jain added that the university was “taking all necessary steps to support her (if she comes forward) but at a larger level we’ve already started all those student discussions with the administration and student body”.

The original open letter was one unnamed student’s very personal account of how she is trying to come to terms with the alleged sexual harassment and assault by her unnamed best friend.

We understand that the author of the open letter has remained anonymous and that her identity is not widely known on campus.

Nalsar associate professor of law Nimushakavi Vasanthi, who heads the college’s committee against sex harassment (CASH) has already circulated a detailed email to students with advice.

Nalsar professor Amita Dhanda had left the following messages under the original Facebook post:

Keep strong and keep well. I think it is important to speak out both in public and private as to what is meant by consent. How each process in a relationship needs to be consented. A consent to spend an evening drinking together, holding hands and teasing each is a consent for just that and no more. In not seeking consent each step of the way be it man or woman is not only being disrespectful of the other, it is also robbing yourself of the high of finding pleasure through reciprocity and real acceptance. In protesting you are insisting on that reciprocity and I hope your disclosure gets all of you young women and men to honestly deliberate on this pathology of human relationships.

We have just reached out to Nalsar VC Faizan Mustafa, asking if he would like to comment and will update the story if he responds.

Update 17 September: Mustafa has sent us a comment yesterday, which we have now published here.

The Nalsar SBC statement

Recently, the NALSAR student body learnt of an alleged instance of sexual harassment.

The Student Bar Council condemns any act of sexual harassment. The Student Bar Council wishes to reassure the aggrieved and other students that such instances of sexual harassment will not be tolerated.

While we have an existing mechanism in place to address any complaint of sexual harassment, it is imperative to respect the choice and consent of the aggrieved in choosing to approach the appropriate forums.

The Student Bar Council also identifies the dire need to address the larger points raised in the Open letter.

Further, the Student Bar Council shall strive to create a conductive environment to foster discussions and sensitization on campus. Steps are also being taken to make the institutional structures more accessible and sensitive to students’ needs.

In light of this complaint, we also request the Vice Chancellor not to roll back or compromise on the extant liberal standards of campus rules. The incident should not be used to bring back outdated regressive rules.

We are convinced that a conductive debate can take place only in a liberal environment.

Photo by Anjaneyadas.

Comments

Guest 16 Sept 2016, 15:38
+7 -10
I'm sorry, but this shows the hypocrisy of the feminist-leftist brigade : there has been a rape on campus, and all they can do is issue statements. Why aren't the police being called? And what action was taken against Nalsar students msbehaving in the past, like the student arrested for sexually harassing an air hostess? http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Nalsar-student-misbehaves-with-flight-stewardess-held/articleshow/48752522.cms

Kavita Krishnan, Kanhaiya, Mihira Sood: where are you now??? Had this happened in a university with a BJP appointee, the lefties would have blamed it on Modi, Smriti Irani etc. Of late there have been rapes reported in JNU but not one word from the lefties.
huh? 17 Sept 2016, 05:46
+4 -0
Your attempt to immediately make this a political left v. right issue is really low. This constant where were you when..., where are you now... refrain is just an attempt to sideline the issue at hand. Have ever spoken up about rape? Will you ever?

At the same time I would like to add that you are factually incorrect. There were many statements about the rape reported in JNU, both from the students and also from faculty. Kavita Krishnan also made a statement.

Also, please note that it is feminist to respect the wishes of the survivor. If she wants to remain anonymous this must be respected. If she wants to approach the police or pursue disciplinary actions, make no mistake that she will be supported.
Shamirpet 2.0 16 Sept 2016, 15:42
+5 -1
A very mature response by the SBC. Its atleast better than last years incompetent SBC members.
Insider 17 Sept 2016, 07:20
+2 -2
Haha, you're out of touch with reality. The reason why the SBC even made a statement is because the VC 'forced' them to
Alumnus2cents 16 Sept 2016, 20:06
+4 -2
@Guest: Must you politicise even the most serious of issues affecting individuals? Grow a pair and let things take their course. If you have to politicise, do it in the appropriate fora.

As for the individuals you've named, each stood for something and had the sense to use public discourse to actively engage with all people. Im no leftist, but if someone messes about, it's right to raise ones voice.

Further, kudos to the SBC for issuing a pre-emptive statement. It's what one would expect from those who are expected to represent the students.

@Shamirpet 2.0: grow a pair and leave the batch oriented mindset.

@Aggreived: Whoever you are, know that there are people out there who would always be there in solidarity regardless of how people try pulling you down. There's no right way of dealing with such a situation. Only hope you're doing fine.
Guest 17 Sept 2016, 07:09
+1 -3
I agree with the comment saying this SBC is bolder than the last one. NALSAR suffers from many deficiencies. For example, the overall quality of faculty is poor, with very few alumni of NALSAR (or other NLUs). We need better faculty in corporate law, and also other subjects of commercial relevance. Also, there are issues with infrastructure. The old SBC was not concerned with anything and were pro-establishment people. I am not taking names as I do not wish to make it political, but you can guess who I am talking about.
Shamirpet 2.8 17 Sept 2016, 16:57
+1 -1
@Guest : What tripe, and utter nonsense. Not concerned with anything, it seems. I don't want to start a debate on this page on the relative merits and demerits of any policy of the SBC or the functioning of any SBC; but no SBC till now has done anything about the quality of faculty. The last years SBC started and encouraged many new initiatives - which is what is the legacy of last years 5th years.
Guest 18 Sept 2016, 07:23
+1 -0
What can the SBC do about quality of faculty? Conversely, the faculty hasn't been able to do much about student quality. That is a bigger problem!
Girl in NALSAR 18 Sept 2016, 07:41
+2 -3
I think if at all there has to be a debate it is this - should respect for the victim's privacy / agency trump the right of other people on campus/society to know that the guy in question has a history of sexual assault and does not respect consent. It is better for their safety so that they may regulate their interactions with such a person. Given that the victim describes him otherwise seemingly a 'decent' and unsuspecting guy - may be others should be beware.

Request the victim/her friends to let others know the identity of the perpetrator by word-of-mouth publicity even if she chooses against official action.

We are in a society where "Don't get raped" messages are still unfortunately relevant.
Defamation 18 Sept 2016, 16:33
+5 -1
Yes, because defamation is just yet another word that is part of your syllabus to be ignored. Perfect suggestion, do not initiate formal action against an alleged perpetrator, instead use gossip groups and social media access to generate libel and slander! I can't even figure out what all law students are being taught in these 'islands of excellence' these days! Mind you, I am NOT saying the victim is lying or dressing up the truth. Simply that while it is her choice whether to initiate formal action or not, it certainly should not be a situation where it gets restricted to one-sided versions in social media that generates further rumours with impunity. Neither law nor justice must work like that.