BCI chief: 'Narendra Modi is Mahatma Gandhi reborn' | NaMo: 'Never seen a court'

Namo
Namo
Prime ministerial hopeful Narendra Modi, Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra and legion of judges convened at a BCI function in Gandhinagar.

NaMo: Not seen courts or chambers (unlike Mahatma)
NaMo: Not seen courts or chambers (unlike Mahatma)
“)Narendra Modi, Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra and legion of judges convened at a BCI function in Gandhinagar. [click for photo of Mishra and Modi]

Prime ministerial hopeful Narendra Modi has said at the end of a Gandhinagar function commemorating 50 years of the Bar Council of India (BCI), as reported by the Indian Express:

“This is a field in which I am not worthy enough to say anything, because never in my life was I booked for a case of even parking on the wrong side. I have neither gone to any advocate’s office nor have seen any court premises… If I have seen courts they were only in films,” said Modi.

Meanwhile, BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra said: “Mahatma Gandhi is reborn in Narendra Modi.”

Mishra added: “We chose Gujarat for this programme after looking at the atmosphere in 2014 […] In 2013, we had invited Manmohan Singh, but after seeing the wave of 2014, we have decided to address the issues over here. It was essentially needed that our national leader should know about the plight of legal fraternity.”

The PTI reported that Modi added, on the subject of reducing the pendency of cases:

“If we focus on a policy-driven governance, if there is good governance, pendency of cases will be reduced… Numerous litigations are filed by people against the government as there is no clear policy on many issues.”

Modi also suggested that legal issues should be aired on television, akin to TV’s parliamentary broadcast: “Why shouldn’t we make a programme on legal issues which can be broadcast at least once in a week. If Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha channels can be run, why not a channel on judiciary.”

The event was attended by a battery of Supreme Court judges and high court judges and chief justices, according to the Express.

Photo by Al Jazeera

Comments

Bullshit 2 Mar 2014, 11:44
+5 -6
Bull shit... doesn't main stream media broadcast this nonsense enough ?
Arjun Sharma 2 Mar 2014, 12:06
+11 -7
Quite disgusting, the comparison of Namo to the Mahatma.
GueGue 7 Mar 2014, 07:12
+1 -2
[quote name="Arjun Sharma"]Quite disgusting, the comparison of Namo to the Mahatma.[/quote]

That you, Arjun Sharma, choose to hold Mahatma Gandhi in high esteem is surely not Manan Kumar Mishra's fault ?

Gandhi was tried for sedition and jailed in 1922. If Sharma were to be alive then, what would he have called Gandhi ? A law breaker, naturally ?

(Of course, laws changed. I know this isn't 1922).

Or, was Manan Kumar Mishra alluding to Lord Meghnad Desai's Mahatma Gandhi ? (Alert: Criticism of Gandhi, do not read except at your own risk and responsibility)

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/by-endorsing-gita-gandhi-condoned-violence_750938.html

Don't get me wrong...I certainly respect Sharma's "right to disgust", and to hold his own opinions which might be, to me, equally so!
GueGue 7 Mar 2014, 07:16
+1 -0
As he himself admits, NaMo hasn't thought much about the judiciary.

Kian, you should ask Subramanian Swamy some questions. Bar&Bench had interviewed Swamy but the article is behind a paywall.
Arjun Sharma, SAM 24 Dec 2016, 21:40
+0 -0
Still holds good
Insider 2 Mar 2014, 15:18
+6 -2
The BCI Chairman is seeking a BJP ticket to contest the Lok Sabha polls.
111 2 Mar 2014, 16:06
+4 -0
I think Mr Mishra had contested elections on a Congress ticket in 2009 (and lost). I guess he is switching to BJP now.

Would this mean that Mr Mishra will now not be dictated by the Congress politicians who are blocking foreign law firms? This could be the real story out of this. Rumour has it that P Chidambaram is blocking liberalization at the behest of his good friend You Know Who.
No 3 Mar 2014, 08:07
+1 -0
I don't know who. Pray tell? Subtle hint also good enough. Thanks
Dull 3 Mar 2014, 11:32
+3 -0
Subtle Hint: Sounds like Lyril.
Guest 2 Mar 2014, 18:03
+9 -2
narendra modi suggestion of 'a channel exclusively on legal issues' sounds a good, innovative and desirable step towards electronic tv media. this channel may telecast supreme court proceedings etc especially on constitutional issues where a constitution bench is deliberating with 'lords of the bar'. this could be a very informative and learning experience for lawyers, judges in lower courts, teachers and students of law.due to his innovative idea and approach good number of people are ready to forget the sad past of modi. people seems to be ready to give narendra modi a chance to prove his worth.
anurag deep,asso. prof. ILI, new delhi
Bullshit 3 Mar 2014, 07:59
+1 -2
With due respect. Have you been an academician from the start or have you practiced law for even one day?
Paid LI!! 2 Mar 2014, 19:20
+4 -16
Now seems LI is being paid by BJP... this is sick!! Did LI think before publishing it? Modi = Bloodshed again... Atleast dont compare him to Mahatma.. Mahatma did not kill poeople for religion!!
Anon 3 Mar 2014, 05:36
+9 -1
I don't think this means that LI is being paid by BJP. I think it's important to report this so that we know that even the Bar Council of India is filled with Modi's cronies. I am glad that LI reported this- we need to know how incredibly communalised bar associations in India can be.
kianganz 3 Mar 2014, 11:34
+0 -0
Seems like some others weren't too pleased by the political statements of the BCI chairman either:
http://www.legallyindia.com/201403034403/Bar-Bench-Litigation/bci-chief-criticised-for-playing-electoral-politics-after-namo-gives-free-food-for-7000-lawyers
Shuklaji 3 Mar 2014, 12:17
+2 -2
Since when do the Courts and legal systems have to rely on advice from a communal prick and a mass murderer? It is a shame he is being compared to Gandhi.
Bombay Legal 3 Mar 2014, 12:31
+0 -0
"Modi also suggested that legal issues should be aired on television, akin to TV's parliamentary broadcast: "Why shouldn't we make a programme on legal issues which can be broadcast at least once in a week. If Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha channels can be run, why not a channel on judiciary."

Kian, any thoughts on the possibility of LI producing the series, Bombay Legal? :P
kianganz 3 Mar 2014, 12:40
+1 -0
That'd be fun!

However, I believe someone else is actually planning a court TV channel... It's been brewing for a few months, not sure if it's public yet though...

Also, NaMo may not have been aware when he made the comment, but there are already Bloomberg's Court TV and CNN IBN's The Firm...

Without cameras in the courtroom, not sure how much more is worth doing (from NaMo's perspective)?
NAMO fan 4 Mar 2014, 15:28
+0 -0
Just pray that NAMO comes to power. India will be screwed if UPA crooks come to power again. The economy will be ruined and you will all lose your jobs.
LoL 6 Mar 2014, 06:18
+0 -0
The Courts and the lawyers come to him