RamJet argues for 90 mins but HC rejects Jaya bail

The Karnataka high court Tuesday rejected the bail plea of jailed former Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa, abruptly ending frenzied celebrations by her supporters after one of her lawyers earlier said she had got conditional bail.

Justice AV Chandrashekara, who heard Jayalalithaa’s petition, also declined to suspend her four-year jail term even after Special Public Prosecutor G Bhavani Singh submitted he had no objection to her bail application.

The AIADMK leader was convicted and sentenced for four years and fined Rs.100 crore for corruption by a special court here Sep 27.

“No sufficient grounds for suspension of the sentence. The Supreme Court clearly indicated that corruption violates human rights and leads to economic imbalance,” the judge said in his interim order.

The judge also found no prime facie ground for granting bail to the 66-year-old Jayalalithaa.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani appeared for Jayalalithaa as defence counsel.

The bail petitions of Jayalalithaa’s associates - former close associate Sasikala Natarajan, estranged former foster son VK Sudhakaran and former aide J Ilavarasi - were also rejected on the same grounds.

Earlier, in his 90-minute deposition, Jethmalani assured the judge that his client (Jayalalithaa) would abide by any condition put forth for bail, as she was a law abiding citizen and would not flee the country.

But this argument cut no ice with the judge.

A special court here Sep 27 convicted Jayalalithaa for corruption when she was chief minister in 1991-96 and jailed her for four years of simple imprisonment.

She was also fined Rs.100 crore under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The other three were also sentenced to four years in jail and fined Rs.10 crore each.

The bail petitions were posted for hearing by a regular bench Tuesday by a special bench of the high court Oct 1.

Meanwhile, fearing mass protests, police imposed a ban on the assembly of five or more people in a one-kilometer area around the high court here.

In Tamil Nadu, tens of thousands of Jayalalithaa supporters across the state erupted in joy after media outlets reported, on the strength of what an AIADMK lawyer had stated, that she had got conditional bail.

AIADMK members, legislators and MPs gathered in larger numbers at the party headquarters in Chennai and at AIADMK offices across the state danced, burst crackers and distributed sweets.

But the joyous scenes came to a grinding halt when it dawned that the “news” was wrong and that Jayalalithaa’s prayer for bail had actually been turned down.

The very same AIADMK activists — men and women — then turned emotive. Many women openly wailed. The celebrations turned into angry protests. Some were too stunned to speak.

As tensions rose, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O Panneerselvan urged people to maintain calm and not to resort to any protests that would hurt the interests of ordinary citizens.

He also said that protests held by Jayalalithaa supporters should not be linked to the AIADMK government headed by him since her jailing.

Comments

pi 7 Oct 2014, 15:24
+3 -3
i wonder how much did ramjet cost? and who paid him?
The Truth 7 Oct 2014, 16:30
+13 -1
Do not wonder . You will get the same amount when you will be 92 years old or 74 years of practice
DBS 7 Oct 2014, 17:23
+2 -2
26 lakhs isn't it? Or is it the advance?!?
Commentator 8 Oct 2014, 06:00
+3 -2
It used to be 75 lakh per appearance but since this is a tough case sources say he was paid 1 cr per appearance.. Karnataka lawyers dont make that sum in a month's practice.
kianganz 8 Oct 2014, 06:02
+2 -2
Surely not Rs 1 crore per appearance... Maybe a tenth that, at most:
http://www.legallyindia.com/201210223210/Bar-Bench-Litigation/indias-most-expensive-senior-advocates-profiled-briefly
Ponty 9 Oct 2014, 03:01
+0 -0
Senior Advocates charge a whole day's fee for appearances outside Delhi. Must be around 30-35 lacs.
Bangalore Lawyer 8 Oct 2014, 07:43
+0 -1
You sure dont seem to know about Senior Counsels in Bangalore. There are pleanty of them who make that sum and more in a months practice (Agreed that it wouldnt be possible per appearance but definitley happening in a months practice. FOr that matter no SC from Bombay, Madras or even Delhi HC would be raking in that sum as mentioned by you per appearance). Get your facts about the Bangalore market and its lawyers before making a statement.
Sosamma 9 Oct 2014, 03:05
+0 -1
Ramjet is the one advocate all currept politions including Lalu, Jaya,2G and coal. If curreption should remove then remove ramjet first!!
Babubhai Vaghela 9427608632 8 Oct 2014, 05:30
+2 -0
If Laloo Yadav is out on bail, there is a little justification for Jayalalithaa not to get bail.
Commentator 8 Oct 2014, 06:01
+1 -0
Laloo yadav served 10 months in prison. did u even read the order of the High Court or are you here just to comment like the commentator?
Babubhai Vaghela 9427608632 8 Oct 2014, 06:30
+1 -0
Already read about Karnataka HC contention for denying bail to Jayalalithaa that does not seem to hold water. In what way bail to Jayalalithaa is LEGALLY related to 10 month period of Laloo Yadav is unanswered common man question. Both Laloo Yadav and Jayalalithaa should get bail or both not get. Better is corrupted Constitutional Authorities not granted bail at all even by Supreme Court.
Commentator 9 Oct 2014, 06:47
+0 -0
Because Ramjet quoted Laloo in his arguments? and that was the HC's reply. Both are different circumstances, dont compare them.
ramdbest 8 Oct 2014, 05:46
+0 -1
Ram is best its judges who are scared of aspersions being cast on them. Further there's no case and more often then not Ram does pro bono cases. Hail Ram
Who Cares ! 8 Oct 2014, 05:49
+1 -0
Who cares what he took for this bail ! Its known that he projects his retirement to extort more money from the helpless and corrupt. And, is there a lawyer out there who cannot foretell how Ammas case is going to pan out? The way I see it, this is the first of many more hearings that are to come, which will be appealed at vey possible level. Amma will get her bail and this case will close when the public at large has forgotten of her and her alleged scams.
Bangalore Advocate 8 Oct 2014, 16:07
+1 -1
Read the order passed by Karnataka High Court in rejecting bail of Jayalalitha http://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/noticeBoard/crl.a835-2014.pdf