SC and HCs to revisit senior advocate appointment mechanism

The higher judiciary is revamping the system of appointment of senior advocates, to weed out incompetent advocates and appointment through ‘uncle judges’. In the Delhi high court, the full court will now have to consider the name of each applicant, while in the Supreme Court five sitting judges of the SC will have to agree to the candidature of an advocate.

The Times of India reported:

Some of the advocates who have not been considered by a particular high court for such prestigious position have allegedly used clouts to get the coveted post from high courts of smaller states where the bench is relatively smaller.

Comments

2 cents 17 Jul 2013, 05:34
+0 -0
5 sitting judges of the SC are already under fire for continuous failure of the collegium system. Judges of HCs and SCs are in the news for nepotism, appointment of their kin as the government's law officers (even in the absence of the minimum eligibility), elevation of related lawyers and the practice of "uncle justice".

Full court seems fine but what happens when a few good judges find themselves in the minority. And what is the reasoning behind relying on 5 judges when the collegium system is already under fire?
Whatever 17 Jul 2013, 19:11
+0 -0
SCs ! I thought there was only one Supreme Court in this country?
kianganz 17 Jul 2013, 19:27
+0 -0
Right you are! Correcting...