CJI Thakur - emotive or with sniffles? - argues with NaMo: How can you block judges while jails are overflowing?

India cannot achieve its economic growth without a robust judiciary overseen by an adequate number of judges, Chief Justice TS Thakur said on Sunday.

CJI Thakur delivers emotive speech (via ANI: CJI TS Thakur breaks down in front PM Modi, stresses need for more judges)
CJI Thakur delivers emotive speech (via ANI: CJI TS Thakur breaks down in front PM Modi, stresses need for more judges)

Chief Justice TS. Thakur today made an emotive appeal to the government to have more judges to ensure justice for all, prompting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to say he will tackle “the serious concerns”.

Addressing a conference of chief ministers, chief justices of high courts and Supreme Court judges, Chief Justice Thakur said India’s judiciary suffered from a poor judge-population ratio and serious vacancies even as it dealt with an “avalanches of cases”.

The ratio was dismal compared to even other developed countries, he said, looking at the prime minister who was on the dais.

The chief justice took on the government over the failure to come up with judicial reforms, said judges should be told to work extra years when they retire, and hit out at the “commercial courts”.

“It is not enough to criticise. You can’t shift the entire burden on judges,” he said, pointing out that nine judges of the American Supreme Court together decided 81 cases in a year whereas a judge in the Indian Supreme Court decided 2,600 cases a year.

“The only remedy is to establish more courts and increase the strength of the judges to 50 judges per million population.”

According to the programme schedule, the chief justice was to speak for no more than 15 minutes. But an emotive Justice Thakur spoke for more than 35 minutes as he gave vent to his frustration.

Modi offered to set up a committee of government officers and people from the judiciary to address the issues. “I will make efforts to address the serious concerns.”

India, the chief justice said, cannot achieve economic growth without a robust judiciary overseen by an adequate number of judges. This was also needed to attract foreign capital.

“Those whom we are inviting (to invest) are also concerned with the judicial system and justice delivery,” he said. “Efficacy of the judicial system is so vitally connected with the development of the country.”

He moaned that the suggestions of the apex court collegium for appointing more judges were pending with the government but “nothing really appears to be moving”.

Justice delivery system was an illusion for 30 percent of the population living below poverty line, he said. “The infrastructure in the subordinate courts needs to be upgraded and vacancies filled.”

He said more than 38 lakh cases were pending in the high courts and asked: “What is the way out?”

“We must do whatever is possible to reduce the pendency of the cases. The jails are full and overflowing.”

At the same, every year, courts in India disposed off more than two crore cases.

In 1987, the government’s Law Commission had said that India’s judicial system needed 40,000 judges at different levels. Since then the country’s population had increased by 30 crore people.

He recalled that when then chief justice Altmash Kabir told then prime minister Manmohan Singh in 2013 that nothing was being done to address the ills of the judicial system, the latter replied that it concerned state governments and they had no money.

Chief Justice Thakur took a dig at the government the way it dealt with commercial courts, saying they were not meant to draw on existing judicial infrastructure and judges strength.

The commercial courts in Dubai have “solemn and efficient environment”, he said. But the way they worked in India won’t “serve the purpose for which they were created”.

He said one way to overcome the problem was to rope in trained judges to deal with the backlog of cases. “At this stage, to ask a judge to go home (after retirement) is criminal.”

Clarification: Our initially published article noted that Thakur was emotive and tearful, following reports on Twitter. However, having watched ANI’s video below, his use of a handkerchief could just as easily be explained by a case of a seasonal cold.

The Hindu’s Krishnadas Rajagopal tweeted :

CJI Thakur breaks down during his speech at CJ-CM Conference in presence of PM Modi. Blames govt inaction for judges vacancies.

Appts of 169 HC judges pendg with govt. Jails r overflowg. 2/3rd jail inmates r undertrials, how long will u take to clear files: CJI to PM

Y don’t u reduce ur holidays. I suggested this wen I was Guj CM Was criticised: PM Modi to CJI @ CM-CJ conference.

No point of Make in India or FDI if judiciary can’t function without efficacy: CJI to PM

In 1987 ur Law Commission said there shud be 50 judges per 10 lakh population. U have done nothing till now and judges are blamed: CJI to PM

WATCH: Chief Justice of India TS Thakur breaks down during his speech at Jt conference of CMs and CJ of HCs in Delhihttps://t.co/xD1tro8rmX

— ANI (@ANI_news) April 24, 2016

Comments

dramaqueen 24 Apr 2016, 10:34
+1 -7
lol..thats hilarious!
boom 24 Apr 2016, 18:19
+8 -0
what's wrong with you?
TST 24 Apr 2016, 13:29
+5 -0
About time someone called the government's bluff. Commercial Courts improve our standing in ease of doing business but what about access to justice?
Guest 24 Apr 2016, 17:14
+1 -7
He cried because it was a big moment for him and not because of sad judiciary.
Bombay High Court Watc 24 Apr 2016, 23:31
+5 -2
This is a joke right? More judges is not the only answer. We need competent judges, better judicial infrastructure, lack of corruption in the judiciary, transparency in the collegium. Come on CJI Thakur the Indian Judiciary is a joke, physician heal thyself.
KC Jha 25 Apr 2016, 06:21
+2 -1
I fully agree. In my 20 yrs of exp as advocate, I have found more than 90% of judges at all levels either incompetent or unwilling to work. They wish to adjourn cases at the drop of hat! They accommodate and indulge defendant to such a great extent that the whole purpose of seeking justice goes away!
Watching from Bombay 25 Apr 2016, 08:07
+1 -0
Hey do i know you?
Watching from Bombay 25 Apr 2016, 08:09
+2 -0
Hon'ble Shri. PM Modi-JI also cried when he gave his first speech addressing both houses.
Justice Thakur addressed too can do that while addressing two branches of the State.
Nothing wrong.
Litigants and Lawyers always cry at the state of affairs.
I don't know why I started writing this comment, now i will stop.
limca 25 Apr 2016, 03:55
+1 -1
Stupid LI. Today's TOI quotes Thakur as saying he got emotional.So change yr headline
Guest 25 Apr 2016, 06:47
+2 -0
A great speech by hon'ble CJI for efficacious judiciar
Guest again 25 Apr 2016, 09:03
+2 -0
The justices should bring back all the officers who have gone on deputation to various organisations. Why should a PDJ or a DJ be the law secretary of a state. and why should training institutions have people who took the vow to work as judges be allowed to man the administrative wing of various institutions!! One way to reduce the vacant slots is surely to bring back all judicail officers back to their parent high courts and get them to be at the trial courts dispensing justice!!
First Hear 25 Apr 2016, 09:14
+5 -1
CJI must first learn to hear to hear more than 4 matters a day before shedding crocodile tears

Rumour in court: He was just wiping his face!
Guest 25 Apr 2016, 12:11
+0 -0
Rumour in court? What did you mean idiot?
Solomon Grundy 28 Apr 2016, 00:05
+0 -0
This is just crocodile tears. The CJI has to put his own house in order first. Just take a look at the SC calendar. If you have two holidays in a week one on Tuesday and the other on Thursday, the SC declares the whole week holiday. Have we ever heard any organization take only full week holiday for Diwali. If the Central Govt. shuts down for one full week for Diwail, will the citizens accept it. I would invite anyone to watch one full days proceedings of any court on SLP days. The list is run through in a jiffy,the judges retire to the chamber for what? Judgements are reserved and pronounced four months later. In the last two weeks, the Madras High Court had two farewell to the judges. SO the court rose at 3.15 pm as against 4.45. One day it was a swearing in of a new judge and the court sat at 11.30 a.m. instead on 10.30 a.m. Cant the courts swear in the judges at 9.30 am or provide a farewell at 5.30 p.m. The judges should understand that the litigation are waiting in a queue. Unnecessary adjournments for no reason and incompetent judges at the subordinate judiciary and at the High Courts are a curse to this nation. What can we do except to suffer silently?
Bombay High Court Watc 30 Apr 2016, 00:40
+0 -0
I have seen worse things in the Bombay High Court. The judiciary has become a laughing stock. I can go on and on and on about Judges in the Bombay High Court, their favourite lawyers, the nepotism, the incompetence, it is never ending.
PC Jain Advocate 15 Aug 2016, 07:29
+0 -0
Our Present Judges particularly collegium of Supreme Court Judges, in the name of independance of Judiciary, are all hell bent to retain the exclusive power to appoint judges in High Court and Supreme Court. All this emotion and tears are sign of frustration of loosing time to induct their choice. How a Parliament and Govt. can be bypassed by judiciary so blatently. Very serious problem.