Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India TS Thakur declined to entertain a public interest litigation demanding bringing of a uniform civil code in the country on Monday telling the petitioner that the power to do so remains with parliament and not the judiciary, reported The Times of India...

The Supreme Court refused a district-level judge relief in his petition demanding reservation for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes in the higher judiciary on Monday, reported The Hindustan Times . The petitioner judge, Kanta Prasad was seeking promotion to the Uttarakhand high court on the basis...

The term of all members of the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa ended last week (2 December) with the Goa advocate general Atmaram Nadkarni having been appointed as chairman of the bar council.

The Delhi high court on Wednesday refused to restrain the city government from enforcing it’s decision to allow even and odd number cars to ply in Delhi on alternative dates, saying the decision is on a “trial basis”. A division bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath refused to pass...

The Bombay high court on Tuesday cited several lacunae pertaining to the procedures for checking the presence of alcohol in the blood samples of Bollywood megastar Salman Khan and lack of concrete material on the issue that he had consumed liquor in a bar before the hit-and-run accident on 28 Septem...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Rajasthan government on a plea for prohibiting the use of elephants in the Amer Fort and the Elephant Village for joy rides and exhibitions and to protect them from the cruelty they were being subjected to. A bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice ...

Incarcerated Bollywood actor Sanjay Dutt, whose five-year sentence for his involvement in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts was confirmed by the Supreme Court in March 2013, will be freed from prison by 7 March, 2016, official sources said here on Tuesday. The sources indicated that barring last-minute ...

In a setback to Congress chief Sonia Gandhi and vice president Rahul Gandhi, the Delhi high court on Monday dismissed their plea to quash summons issued to them by a trial court on BJP leader Subramanian Swamy’s complaint in the National Herald case.

Justice Sunil Gaur dismissed their pleas which means the Gandhis will have to appear before the trial court in the case.

“This court is of the considered view that the gravity of the allegations levelled against petitioners has a fraudulent flavour involving a national political party and so, serious imputations smacking of criminality levelled against petitioners need to be properly looked into,” said the court.

“Without casting any reflection on the merits of this case and while leaving the larger questions raised in these petitions open, to be considered at the charge stage, these petitions and the pending applications are dismissed with afore-noted clarification.”

Apart from the Gandhis, the court also dismissed the pleas of Congress treasurer Motilal Vora, family friend Suman Dubey and party leader Oscar Fernandes who had moved the high court for quashing of summons to them by the trial court.

On 26 June, the trial court issued summons to the Congress leaders on Swamy’s complaint about “cheating” in the acquisition of Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL) by Young India Ltd. (YIL) - “a firm in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi eac h own a 38 percent stake”.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who had appeared for Sonia Gandhi, sought quashing of the proceedings initiated by the lower court against her and the others, saying that the complaint made by Swamy against them were only “allegations without any supporting proof”.

He had said there was no illegality in Young India Ltd. (YIL) taking over Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL), the publisher of the now-defunct National Herald newspaper, as per the Companies Act.

Swamy had claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, as majority shareholders of YIL, benefited from the acquisition of AJL He alleged that AJL had received an interest-free loan of Rs 90.25 crore from the Congress and that the party transferred the debt to YIL for Rs 50 lakh.

At the time, AJL, which had Vora as its chairman, claimed that it could not repay the loan and agreed to transfer the company and its assets to YIL

Saying there are sufficient grounds to summon them, the high court said: “After having considered the entire case in its proper perspective, this court finds no hesitation to put it on record that the modus operandi adopted by petitioners in taking control of AJL via Special Purpose Vehicle i.e. YIL, particularly, when the main persons in Congress Party, AJL and YIL are the same, evidences a criminal intent.”

“Whether it is cheating, criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of trust is not required to be spelt out at this nascent stage. In any case, by no stretch of imagination, it can be said that no case for summoning petitioners as accused in the complaint in question is made out.

“Questionable conduct of petitioners needs to be properly examined at the charge stage to find out the truth and so, these criminal proceedings cannot be thwarted at this initial stage.”

Filing the plea in the high court, the Congress leaders had said Swamy was a political opponent and the present criminal proceedings were initiated only with an intent to secure an oblique political objective.

On 7 December 2015 20:21:32 GMT+05:30, “KIAN GANZ (Legally India)” <kian.ganz> wrote:>>>>-------- Original Message -------->From: Stories >Sent: 7 December 2015 19:50:04 GMT+05:30>To: >Cc: >Subject: National Herald case: HC dismisses Gandhis’ plea against>summons (Second Lead)>>>New Delhi, Dec 7 (IANS) In a setback to Congress chief Sonia Gandhi and>vice president Rahul Gandhi, the Delhi high court on Monday dismissed>their plea to quash summons issued to them by a trial court on BJP>leader Subramanian Swamy’s complaint in the National Herald>case.Justice Sunil Gaur dismissed their pleas which means the Gandhis>will have to appear before the trial court in the case.”This court is>of the considered view that the gravity of the allegations levelled>against petitioners has a fraudulent flavour involving a national>political party and so, serious imputations smacking of criminality>levelled against petitioners need to be properly looked into,” said the>court.”Without casting any reflection on the merits of this case and>while leaving the larger questions raised in these petitions open, to>be considered at the charge stage, these petitions and the pending>applications are dismissed with afore-noted clarification.”Apart from>the Gandhis, the court also dismissed>the pleas of Congress treasurer Motilal Vora, family friend Suman Dubey>and party leader Oscar Fernandes who had moved the high court for>quashing of summons to them by the trial court. On 26 June, the trial>court issued summons to the Congress leaders on Swamy’s complaint about>“cheating” in the acquisition of Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL) by>Young India Ltd. (YIL) - “a firm in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi eac h>own a 38 percent stake”.Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who had appeared>for Sonia Gandhi, sought quashing of the proceedings initiated by the>lower court against her and the others, saying that the complaint made>by Swamy against them were only “allegations without any supporting>proof”. He had said there was no illegality in Young India Ltd. (YIL)>taking over Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL), the publisher of the>now-defunct National Herald newspaper, as per the Companies Act.Swamy>had claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, as majority shareholders of>YIL, benefited from the>acquisition of AJL He alleged that AJL had received an interest-free>loan of Rs 90.25 crore from the Congress and that the party transferred>the debt to YIL for Rs 50 lakh.At the time, AJL, which had Vora as its>chairman, claimed that it could not repay the loan and agreed to>transfer the company and its assets to YIL Saying there are sufficient>grounds to summon them, the high court said: “After having considered>the entire case in its proper perspective, this court finds no>hesitation to put it on record that the modus operandi adopted by>petitioners in taking control of AJL via Special Purpose Vehicle i.e.>YIL, particularly, when the main persons in Congress Party, AJL and YIL>are the same, evidences a criminal intent.””Whether it is cheating,>criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of trust is not required>to be spelt out at this nascent stage. In any case, by no stretch of>imagination, it can be said that no case for summoning petitioners as>accused in the complaint in>question is made out.”Questionable conduct of petitioners needs to be>properly examined at the charge stage to find out the truth and so,>these criminal proceedings cannot be thwarted at this initial>stage.”Filing the plea in the high court, the Congress leaders had said>Swamy was a political opponent and the present criminal proceedings>were initiated only with an intent to secure an oblique political>objective.Regards,IANS Support Team>>>>— >Kian Ganz >Publishing Editor >Legally India - News for Lawyers >http://www.LegallyIndia.com > >Tel (India): +91 900 405 6651 >Twitter: http://twitter.com/legallyindia</kian.ganz>

The Himachal Pradesh high court dismissed a bunch of petitions filed against setting up of mobile towers on health grounds, citing lack of evidence connecting emissions from the towers to decrease in human health reported Times of India . Division bench of Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmed Ali and Justice...

The Allahabad high court asked the state government to notify ‘heritage guidelines’ for the entire state including Varanasi in a Public Interest Litigation alleging illegal construction on heritage structures, reported Times of India . The division bench comprising Chief Justice Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwa...

The Madras high court stayed last month’s government order that had cancelled registration of NGO Greenpeace India, and observed that the Tamil Nadu Registrar of Societies (RoS) had failed to follow the principles of natural justice, reported Times of India . According to the NGO, the court has gran...

The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a petition seeking cancellation of bail of Bollywood star Salman Khan who was convicted and sentenced in a hit and run case. A bench of Justice FMI Kalifulla and Justice Amitava Roy refused to entertain the plea saying the order of Bombay high court doesn...

Intellectual property cases are exempt from the recently initiatiated process of transfer of small cases from the Delhi high court to Delhi’s district courts, reported Mint . Delhi high court justices GS Sistani and SD Sehgal gave a temporary order in favour of the Asian Patent Association, which ha...

Oral arguments in the sexual harassment case against Madhya Pradesh high court judge SK Gangele began today in the parliament, four months after the Supreme Court dismissed the allegations against him. Legally India understands from sources close to the process that the upper legislative house - Raj...

Justice Tirath Singh Thakur was on Thursday sworn in as the 43rd Chief Justice of India.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled the Tamil Nadu government has no suo motu power to grant remission and release the convicts accused of conspiracy in the assassination case of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. The apex court’s constitution bench headed by Chief Justice HL Dattu said that the s...

Special courts to hear corruption cases are on the Delhi government’s agenda, reported *Business Standard . The government will consult Delhi high court’s chief justice to constitute courts to hear cases under the Janlokpal Bill 2015 and Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 to dispose of these cases at...

Outgoing Chief Justice of India HL Dattu on Tuesday refused to join the ongoing debate on intolerance saying that as head of the country’s judiciary, it would not be proper for him to comment on it. “There is a debate going on in parliament and other places. As the head of an institution, if I say a...

Allahabad high court has in a landmark judgment ruled that a child born out of rape will have inheritance rights over the property of the the biological father reported NDTV . The court also discussed the need for rehabilitation of victims of rape and their children while adjudicating a matter where...

The Delhi high court requested Delhi’s Patiala House district court to video-record the trial in the 1984 riots case, in a case transfer order won by senior advocates Colin Gonsalves and HS Phoolka for riot victim Joginder Singh.