Panjab University law school students have called off a hunger strike after several hours as the University caved in to their demands.

The Times of India (TOI) reported today that the Panjab University Student Union (PUSU) and the Hindustan Student Association (HSA) called for a hunger strike to protest against the increase in minimum lectures, to decrease minimum attendance requirements and to reduce the chairman’s power.

According to TOI, the students wanted the requirement of minimum lectures in each subject to be reduced from 70 to 33 per cent.

Additionally, the students called for the minimum attendance in an academic session to be reduced to 70 per cent from 75 per cent, allegedly in accordance with the Bar Council rules.

According to the Indian Express the dispute appeared to have come to a head last Friday (8 January) over various issues, including graduate LLM programme reservations for Panjab University students and migration fees to move to the university campus.

An editorial published in TOI today asked whether “Chandigarh cops [are] scared of student leaders”, having dropped charges against PUSU leaders who allegedly attempted murder and fired gun shots against a student from another local university last summer.

If all this is true, it sounds like a veritable warzone out in Punjab law school community.

Any thoughts as to what is going on?

And if any Panjab University students would like to elaborate, please get in touch with us. I for one would be interested in hearing the full story behind this.

Last year we also reported on the hunger strikes and four-year battle of students at Hidayatullah National Law University Raipur (HNLU). [SEE NOTE BELOW]

I have received a request from an HNLU student to clarify that the HNLU strikes were organised for a completely different reason and motivation from the Panjab University protests. I would therefore like to state for the record that the two are not directly related except for the fact that both involved hunger striking law students. Apologies for any confusion caused.

Comments

Anonymous 13 Jan 2010, 17:21
+2 -0
It is a mad mad jungle out there...the fault is both of the students and the administration. The students don't concentrate on studies rather they indulge in other activities. The standard of legal education is so poor in PU especially in the Department of Laws...It has all come down to politics and fights between the student bodies. A student with academic capabilities is left out in all this chaos. Ironically, I think that it is a fair demand to reduce the requirement of minimum lectures in each subject and the minimum attendance in an academic session as the quality of teachers and the lectures delivered by them is not at all satisfactory (except a handful of them-good teachers have become like the ozone layer-depleting day by day-and we are to blame for that). No doubt that there are a few good teachers in the campus (Including those in UILS), but they also need to revamp their way of teaching to produce good lawyers for the society who know LAW also and not POLITICS only. I do not doubt it that the Department of Laws produces fine graduates who excel in the fields of civil services, judicial services and other similar sectors but today that void of good academicians, teachers and all the more of worthy lawyers is felt. The corporate sector is also one such area which needs to be focused on by the Department and now there being UILS the task has become more difficult for the DoLs. PRACTICAL Training 'must' be there and by that I mean real practical training and not a mere Court visit to chillax (Chill + Relax). The students also need to put in a lot of effort to involve in the process and change it from political to an academic institute. The teachers should also change their indifferent attitude towards bright students and must pay more attention towards them which would help them improve. I understand that there are very few resources with the Department but the system needs to be changed and there needs to be more transparency and democracy in the system where every decision of the administration is put to a test. These institutes are the temples of legal education and they must perform their sacred duty as religiously as possible. I know that the points raised here by me may not be exactly related to the topic at hand but these are the essential facts which take us to the roots of the problem. Ultimately what counts is the fulfillment of the student's dreams of which he builds a picture in his mind while entering the institution.
(I am a graduate from DoLs and these are my personal views and I meant no offence to any person or institution.)
(*Note: HSA is not Hindustan Student Association-Please check that)