Kasab may have been the lone gunman to have survived from the lot of 10 terrorists who entered India by the sea route to create a havoc in the city. But is sending him to the gallows the right route to adopt? I firmly believe that anyone who attacks my nation deserves to be slaughtered, as was the fate of the other nine! But what irks me, or rather irk is a very mild word to use, what makes my blood boil is the way the trial has been projected! It has been shown as if we are playing all fair! Now the death sentence will go to the High Court for confirmation and then an appeal in the Supreme Court will pull on for another decade. If, at all, these two stages are expedited, what happens when the clemency petition goes to the Prez? The wait is unending… For those like Kasab and Afzal Guru , who should have been hanged years ago, they might die their natural deaths waiting for clemency and the whole world will see how compassionate we are! Or how ineffective a system we have! After Dhananjay Chatterjee, we have stopped! Why not give those who deserve to die, the ultimate punishment in our books? But we go by those very books and make futile all the attempts at justice for those who have suffered the troubled times! And who gets justice are the criminals?

Comments

Anonymous guest 7 May 2010, 16:25
+0 -0
Since our whole system is unfair, we try to project how fair it is. On the other hand, a country which is otherwise fair, wouldn't go into all this debacle when its rational to bloody hang the convicted terrorist. E.g. USA didn;t hesitate to pass Patriot ACt, and despite the big deal about due process, they authorized torture like water-boarding even for suspects (which was unfortunate)
allym 7 May 2010, 17:29
+0 -0
Sometimes harsh steps have to be taken to prove that we do not let those against us rest in peace. Only problem here is, we are a bit too slow to deliver!
Vikramaditya 7 May 2010, 22:24
+1 -0
I don't think killing Kasab will be a solution in anyway. Killing an accused is no deterrent. The practice of hanging even someone like Kasab is against humanity and is not in the interest of a civilized society. It is understandable that justice must be shown and criminals must get punished. But, will killing someone in punishment serve the purpose? even, if the accused has got the award of death penalty, it would take a long time to be implemented. So, what about the mental condition of the accused who is waiting in the custody to be hanged? We should take these views in mind before coming to a conclusion.
Anonymous guest 8 May 2010, 00:42
+1 -0
Despite all my legal training, I can't be idealistic in this case. Kasab is in a different category than other convicts. And no sense of humanity would call for consideration for someone like Kasab - a cold blooded, superbly trained and ideologically indoctrinated weapon of destruction. He has been found guilty and he should be hanged. I don't understand what "purpose" we are talking about here. Of course it won't stop more Kasabs being produced. But if people like Kasab are not punished, the whole purpose of criminal justice is defeated. Law being an instrument of social control, society must have faith in the law. If the law does not punish Ksab, people will lose faith (esp. people who have suffered and will be suffering because of Kasab's actions).

If the shield of law cannot protect, then the sword must surely avenge?
Anonymous guest 12 May 2010, 00:44
+0 -0
I think by using the word 'killing', the blogger has himself used a value laden term.
allym 28 May 2010, 00:50
+0 -0
Dear Vikramaditya, I can understand what you say regarding capital punishment, but tell me how justified are we if the world believes anyone can do what they want and die at an old age in an Indian Jail?
the point is, it is not just a punishment for him but a message to the world.
dear anonymous guest 4: i am in complete agreement with you
dear anonymous guest 5: the word killing was used with the intention of not just punishment for kasab but a role reversal for a lesson. it has the value of emotions along with justice
Anonymous guest 1 Apr 2011, 17:56
+0 -0
Vague title. Killing Kasab is the solution to what? Terrorism in general? Of course not. This ongoing trial and hype around it? Maybe.

Sure i empathize with the nation, not just the people who suffered during the attacks in Mumbai. But the law is the law, and in the absence of special authorization to take an alternate course, due process must be followed.

Instead of crying for Kasab to be hanged at the earliest, let us take the opportunity to ask for genuine reforms in the way justice is administered in this country. Let us gather momentum and seek an overhaul and improvements.

Let us not forget also, that every day that Ajmal Kasab lives to appear before Court, the media reports the same - and in doing so, we are not only reminded of the trial, but the tragedy that lead to it. As Indians, we have a knack of forgetting - forgetting far too many incidents of violence and terrorism and injustice. Atleast with this trial, we will still remember - that on a day a few years ago, our security lapses were proved and we were attacked.

Always remember.
dpk 22 Nov 2011, 17:28
+0 -0
Yes keeping Kasab in jail is a lesson for all other terrorists that....INDIA IS AN EXCELLENT PLACE FOR HUNTING...EVEN IF WE GET CAUGHT THE INDIAN GOVT. WILL PROVIDE FIVE STAR FACILITIES AND SEND THE WHOLE WORLD THE MESSAGE THAT INDIA LOVES TO KEEP TERRORISTS AS PET AND SPEND CRORES OF MONEY FOR SUCH ASSHOLES RATHER THAN THE POOR HUNGRY INDIANS.................KILL THAT BASTARD USING STONE TO SEND A MSG DAT AGAIN ANY ONE TRY TO TARGET INDIAN HE SHOULD BE KILLED LIKE THIS...!!!!!!!