Advocate K.V.Dhananjay raises a question here; a question that he was asked – men perform the role of priests in Hindu temples; women have been traditionally and customarily barred from this role. Do women have a constitutional right to demand assignment of priest roles to them? Of course, in Hindu temples administered by the State Governments?

*****

These days are said to be a testing time for Hindu religious beliefs and practices. Two days ago, a women’s rights activist group met me with a question – can women who could show competence in the Vedas and the temple rituals stake a claim to priestly roles in temples administered by the State Governments?

I am raising that very question here. I invite readers to express their views.

Thousands of Hindu temples in South India are administered and managed by the State Governments; almost all the major temples in the South are the property of the State. So, do these temples incur a constitutional duty to allow women also to perform the role of the priests? What if a particular expression of this duty is opposed to the long-standing religious doctrine?

I am not expressing my opinion here.

Comments

Aafreen, I Year BA LLB (Honours), TNNLS 19 Apr 2016, 16:32
+1 -0
In my opinion, competent women can serve as priests in the temples. Men are serving as priests even in the temples where the deities are women. The society is expected to accept women as priests to perform pooja to the God/Goddess since it has accepted male priests to perform Pooja to the female deities. It is only the patriarchal society discriminates based on gender and not the God.
Raghav 20 Apr 2016, 04:48
+0 -0
Very interesting question Mr. Dhananjay. There seems to be a curious sort of a paradox here... If the Vedas / temple rituals (and i am including the various sutras etc. in this category) prescribe that scholarship thereof is not meant for women, how then would these women learned in such practices/texts follow them without violating them the very moment they learn them? I am not saying they shouldn't. Am just wondering how could they, in good conscience, claim they follow the 'rituals' as a priest, when the same rituals forbid them from being one?
RB 8 Oct 2017, 06:48
+0 -0
There is a degree of contradiction in all scriptures, which is unsurprising considering the long history of Hinduism (indeed, of any religion), and ever evolving social mores. The rituals themselves have therefore evolved over time. To say that rituals forbid women from being priests is merely the consequence of considering only a subset of the Hindu canon, and is also open to interpretation. For example, the vedas, as interpreted by the Arya Samaj, holds that there is no bar from women learning scriptures or becoming priests. Thus, to approach whether women should be allowed to become priests in temples should be dependent upon the social mores of today; that equality is enshrined in the constitution should be what should guide us.
Abhishek 20 Apr 2016, 07:16
+1 -0
big issue is not this either women should be allowed to be priest in the hindu temple, but the real matter is does our hindu culture and vedas will allow to do so
my view is when we can worship women's as goddess like maa durga, maa shakti etc. not only these the first origin of tridev is from maa shakti then why the women can'y be priest in temples..