Humbly requesting all students to stay united and ignore threats and disinformation being spread by the other side. 🙏🙏🙏

Please also ignore certain disloyal students acting on behalf of the admin. Don’t share any inside info with them, as they will leak it. Please don’t invite them to any Telegram or WhatsApp groups.

I agree with you on the vendetta point, but sometimes for strategic reasons you need to form alliances with people who are dubious. It’s why Netaji allied with the Axis powers and why a secular, centrist, liberal part like the Congress allied with parties like the Muslim League, SP, RJD and DMK.

Please see this news, guys. Mamata Banerjee has said that Rahul Gandhi is not responding to her calls and text messages. It means that Mamata has zero influence outside Bengal. It means that NUJS students have nothing to fear if they continue their protest. The Supreme Court and national media may wish to be on the right side of the Congress, but they have no incentive to be on the right side of the TMC. Thus, please keep chasing Chandrachud, The Print, The Wire etc. You may also approach CPIM Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, who is representing victims of TMC corruption pro bono. He may be able to help.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/video/watch/rahul-gandhi-not-replying-to-my-texts-mamata-drops-big-hint-of-possible-rift-in-india-bloc/vi-BB1nC6ZL?ocid=hpmsn

The ICJ and human rights activists should take note of this, as should the countless law students and profs I see posting on Palestine on Instagram.

I would like to ask the law students in LI: Why has Hamas refused to release the hostages? Why can’t they do so. They can stop the war in 1 second if they release them.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/noa-agramani-israel-hamas-hostage-israeli-woman-kidnapped-by-hamas-from-festival-freed-after-245-days-5849455#pfrom=home-Ndtv.com_topstories

I wanted to make some strong criticisms of the professor and her fellow protestors, but looking at the number of comments that have been banned, I will refrain from doing so. I will instead just say that it is strange why:

A. Only Israel is being singled out.

B. Why a protest had to held at the venue where it took place

The new person is also going to be appointed on contract basis for legal methods which she wants to teach. She wants the university to recruit the new person for ethics which she teaches.

She states that her interest lies in Legal method.

She had appeared in the interview conducted in June 2023 for tenured position and was given a 3 year contract, while she expected a tenured position.

You cannot compare a professor's teaching ability with that of professors from other institutions, for the simple reason that you have not been taught by the latter. That's why publications remain the only objective metric to do that and why your comment about his knowledge being more than most other professors lacks any foundation. Moreover, directorship in this day and age is more about contacts and has got nothing to do with knowledge, not that I'm insinuating that he lacks in knowledge.

You must be either dumb or delusional if you think that NLU rankings of 2005 apply today, or will continue to apply forever. Here's the truth. In 2005, the top 3 NLU ranking was NLSIU>NUJS>NALSAR. In 2015, it became NLSIU>NALSAR>NLUD. In 2020, it became NLSIU>NLUD>NALSAR. Now, it's NLSIU>NLUD>GNLU.

LexisNexis Law Relating to Electronic Contracts by R.K. Singh. Additionally, one of the senior faculty members is an Independent Director at NSE and serves as a director for multiple companies. Her knowledge in corporate law surpasses that of most professors in the nation. Moreover, publications are not the only metric to judge a professor. A professor must also be judged by their teaching ability. Professors in IITs have very reputed publications, but a significant number of students complain that their classes are a snooze fest.

I looked up this person online. He does not even have a Google Scholar page, which for an academic of his age and designation, is not an usual thing had he been interested in publications. However, he does have two Scopus publications that I could see and a book published by Lexis. Rest of his publications aren't too impressive. So overall, certainly not bad, though nothing exceptional, when it comes to publications and scholarship. I am not from GNLU and can't speak for his classroom teaching.

Hi , I'm an lawyer keenly interested in international arbitration. How is the pay at Chambers of Gopal Subramanianium? Are there any vacancies present? Is he currently hiring? How's the work culture?

Litigation chambers are often under a garb of secrecy, can someone please shed some light?

I am from batch of 2026 and a new set up college. Want to pursue an internship under the PE/VC team of any T1. Currently I have three law firm internship all boutique PE/VCs ranked with the VC Intelligence. Which all firm to apply to given I am not from an NLU? Who all among them also provide online internships?

well, as per my knowledge, there are people who do leave the judiciary to pursue a career in litigation.

I am not sure if they start by chosing such a career trajectory.

I mean, I gather you would want to secure the finances in judiciary before getting into litigation since getting directly into litigation without a financial base can be difficult.

However, I am not sure if this is the best idea since your selection depends on a lot of aspect. No matter how hard you study, it may still be difficult to get in. This may result in wasting a lot of time. Definitely not the idea you have in your head. So, think about the other side of it as well.

Moreover, since you are in your 4th year still, try doing internships at good places in litigation -- which pay well. Try to get a place there, if possible. At least make good connections with them.

You are anyway from T1 NLU, so maybe use that? Idk how likely you guys are to get internship at big name chambers, but perhaps more than others?

Largely, in my opinion just don't waste your time with judiciary prep. It may not turn out how you want it to be and it is incredibly lonely -- something to avoid if you are anyway thinking of leaving it in some years.

I am a 4th year BALLB student at a t1 NLU, I was wondering if it a sound strategy to pursue judicial services with the plan of stepping out and setting up independent practice 5-6 years down the line. Please give your honest options without making referencing to BC, it is not about him.

Thank you

Want to join academia or research? Then only pursue LLM. If not, GTFO ! Stop wasting years studying. Go out there and join a firm, advocate or in house.

Moreover there is presently no college in this country that can give you a proper LLM in tech. The better option would be to work in legal firm dealing with tech and use that to join an LLM abroad

While this may not be the answer that you're looking for, you can still apply for other NLUs in their vacant positions. Other than possibly NLSIU, all NLUs will have LLM vacancies after admission. I'm just saying in case a NALSAR/NLUD/NUJS LLM is considered better by you compared to your current options. There's not much difference in quality in one year LLMs offered at most of the NLUs in my opinion.

I've just finished my B.A.LLB from a local private university's law college. I have worked as a non-resident research scholar with a reg-tech think tank for a few months whilst in my final year and have set my mind on pursuing a career in technology law. I have a general thesis on how I'd want to go about this but that's for the long term. My undergrad university isn't a particularly good one and I want to do my LLM with a specialisation in Tech Law and my current options are the following -

1. JGLS (received a call-letter)
2. SLS - Pune (received a call-letter)
3. HNLU Raipur - (applied for their vacant seats) [I have secured a low 2000s rank in my CLAT-PG and ]

Here's what I specifically am looking for from you people -

1. I have spent way too many hours on LI trying to get a sense of the above unis and there's a lot of information but not specifically for LLM.

2. I want to understand the extent and actual level of placements (for LLM) offered by the above unis.

3. I want to assure you that I understand that some of you might have a general broad opinion that none of these are particularly good, or, that JGLS is all marketing heavy, or, SLS has some other specific problem. After a few good hours going through all the threads and discussions about these unis here on LI, I understand the broad complaints and issues but that's not what I'm looking for.

I just want (read: requesting) a detailed, nuanced understanding of the placement scene for the LLM programmes irrespective of them potentially being minimal. If someone has information about even a couple of placements for LLM students from these unis, I'd love to know about it.

Or, at-least, what's the scope/stats for quality assessment-internships at these places.

4. If anyone's pursued an LLM in Tech/Cyber/IT/TMT Law from these unis or any other Indian law schools, I'd love to know your insights too. How was it overall? How were the placements? Where are you working at the moment and how are future prospects?

Thank You.

P.S - Please, for the love of god, kindly refrain from giving me options that aren't these three unis (or) to not do an LLM and intern/work instead etc.

Bro, I am an Indian national and a final year law student in England. I hadn't heard of Legally India until three months ago. I think that should be some indication of how likely Soros is to have either. This site already seems to be a bit of a joke, I would gently advise you to take your conspiracy theories elsewhere.

Had a similar experience while interning at a boutique law firm in mumbai that works in M&A. Was not assigned work past 6 and had to wait until all the associates left the office. I was literally toiling my hours there and they legit did not even let me leave office until 10ish. Was asked to sit for lunch after all the associates and the support staff have eaten, which meant that I could only have lunch when it was 3.30-4 PM. I had interned at various T1 firms and have gotten a T1 job also, but this was a new experience for me. Would not recommend the firm to anyone.

Hiring is going on. There was a LinkedIn post seeking Associates with 1 to 4 PQYE. Culture is better. Recent spike in attrition level have alarmed certain people who now only chase you only when client chase them. Yet, if you are on multiple assignments, you can be open and upfront about the same. They will (have to) understand. LOL. Jokes apart, it is manageable and people understand.

Work hours are crazy since it’s banking. Pay is less, but you have the billing share thing, which will help you touch base of T1.

Overall better: ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 3 Stars