We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
There's contradicting information everywhere...so I'd appreciate if I can get some clarity on this. The phone numbers for any NLU doesn't get answered anyway
The biggest problem on this forum is people keep yapping about STEM, IIT-IIM without any real life experience or idea. And yes if you're wondering if I have any idea, trust me or not, but I do.
JEE is like competing with IQ 115 people and scoring 116 to win.
Half eyed King in the town of blinds is the law career.
At what stage of the on-boarding do they inform you as to whether or not you'll be receiving a stipened?
Does the LI community think his tenure will be extended further? If so, what could be the reasons?
Private law- theory I said. Please read the comment properly. When we're talking about theories of private law- that sort of research is best done in universities, industry really has no space for it. Think of the work Nigam Nuggehalli or Akshaya Kamalnath or Shyam Balaganesh or Umakanth Varottil do- theres an academic and theoretical nature to their work that doesnt translate to an industry job.
you keep saying these nothing statements like "there are good people doing all kinds of law within and outside the university"- like okay then. have a nice day.
I dont think there are any meaningful collaborations that university professors in India are engaged in to be honest. These projects are hard to sustain and hard to succeed.
My perspective is that with tech law in particular, because there are plenty of opportunities in industry and in civil society organisations , because those jobs pay more and offer more flexibility and control than university jobs- the best scholars in that specific field are probably found outside of the university system. I gave examples of those names.
Stop being so defensive- if youre offended no one thought of you/ your professor when suggesting names- perhaps you should work harder or your professor should do more impactful work. I'm done with this conversation now.
Now, coming to the interview part. There will be 2 rounds. First is the HR round and then a lawyer.
Now here is the catch. People hardly ever get through the HR round. Reading the mentioned threat, I failed to understand how come that is, but when I interviewed with their HR and answered all but one of her questions and still wasn't given a go-ahead for the lawyer round, it all started making sense.
I don't know honestly what it is that the firm is looking for. They asked the most basic HR questions. Then some random questions to see if I'm aware of any recent legal developments, if I know any of their deals and what they did in it, etc. I knew all of this since I was quite prepared before my interview. But I was shocked when they rejected me at the HR round itself.
Any updates so far??
You choose...
Meanwhile, the election results suggest that the TMC is on its way out of power, NKC will not get help from outside Bengal. Remember that the Congress and BJP are anyway against the TMC in Bengal, as is the Left. SC judges, academics and politicians outside Bengal have no reason to support NKC.
Only advice I can give you now is that there will be a bull run post 4 June even if the BJP gets a lower majority. Anything above 280 seats is fine. The bull run will be accelerated by infra stocks. Go for infra stocks where the owners/promoters are politically influential.
Please share some meaningful tips for 4th year students concerning skills one must possess (drafting contracts, term sheets etc etc). How/where to acquire such skills, please seniors... I request!
https://www.edexlive.com/news/2024/May/28/gnlu-students-extend-solidarity-with-nujs-professor-students-over-sexual-harassment-allegations-against-vc
done by all parties do including opposition
Opposition is just going to justify its failure because its Young dynamic leader cannot maintain the legacy of his family
Everything here is based on connections of students.
Some students who has good relations with sold off judges, uses their connection to harrasment student coming from humble background
My needs :
Ms office lifetime.
Good battery life.
Decent storage. (Preferably expandable)
SSD.
Casual entertainment. (No gaming)
Good webcam quality.
Servicing centers available.
Decent Ram and preferably expandable.
Size - preferably 15inches +
I know you haven't asked for this advice, but you have other options than a Stephens + JD or a Stephens + three year Indian LLB or Indian LLB + American LLM open to you. You may wish to consider these too.
I know of someone in England that did an undergrad at Stephens and then an LLB at Durham. The guy has secured a training contract at Latham & Watkins' London office (Latham being an American law firm, and one of the largest in the world). So even if the U.S. doesn't work out immediately, you still do have the other options, such as the possibility of going to England with an Indian undergraduate degree which is not in law and studying/practicing there. NB: Don't try NALSAR BALLB + LLB in England, because the visa authorities in England don't allow that kind of thing. An LLB from England would be (i) on the same academic level as your NALSAR BALLB (i.e., Bachelors degree, RQF Level 6); and (ii) in the same subject, meaning that an LLB in England after a BALLB in NALSAR wouldn't represent 'academic progression', which the British rules on student visas consider to be very important. If, like the guy I know, you were to get a TC at a big American firm in London with a combination of a Stephens BA + an LLB from a Russell Group university, you could have a few years' PQE in London, sort yourself out with a British passport and immigrate to the U.S. with that. A longer pathway, but still gets you to your eventual goal. Immigration rules justification: you could do two undergraduate degrees - a Stephens BA + a UK LLB - because, while both of them are at RQF Level 6, they are degrees in different subjects, and as they lead to a career in the law, would still constitute a credible academic plan.
Or if you really want to have all manner of experiences, some UK law schools (King's, UCL and LSE specifically) have what are called 'dual degree partnerships' with U.S. universities. Essentially, you do a four year law degree, called LLB - JD, recognised for purposes of being a practicing lawyer in both the UK and the U.S. Two of your four years are spent studying law in the UK, and two years are spent studying law in the U.S. To give you a sense of what the partnerships for such degrees look like, King's collaborates with Georgetown, giving its English and American Law degree holders a degree of LLB - JD (two years spent at King's and two at Georgetown) and both UCL and LSE have collaborations with Columbia (so, depending on where you get admitted in the UK, you would spend two years in the UK at UCL or LSE, and two years at Columbia), getting a qualifying law degree that could allow you to practice in both England and Wales and the U.S.