Wait for the impact speed to come out instead of taking the media report as the gospel. I remember the Cyrus Mystry accident where everyone was claiming the Merc crashed at 200 but turned out it was going hardly in the mid 80s.

Also don’t think the media attention would have been this much if a Dzire had ramped the couple on the bike but we love sensationalisation don’t we.

Obviously you can’t absolve the car driver too but let’s wait for clearer facts before forming a concrete opinion on the case.

And finally Helmet less riding kills quite a few people across our country annually which could easily have been avoided so please don’t take it trivially.

tired of stupid trolls like you. jj governs and establishes wrongs followed by the subsequent measures for minors, as was the case here.

from your question, i believe you expected something like a jail term or death penalty to the accused boy.

well if that’s the case, ask your political masters to bring a new statute that would amend the existing laws that’d cater to your needs and wants. why go on abusing judiciary and legal system? they dont make laws, do they?

I have had an opportunity to talk to the parents I would explain it to them with an example.

Imagine you have two bulls. You love them both equally, but one is stronger and can do more things than the other. When you give them tasks, you don't give them the same tasks because you know that wouldn't be fair. Instead, you give each bull tasks they can handle, respecting their individual abilities. This way, both bulls are treated fairly according to what they can do.

In the same way, the law treats everyone equally by applying the same rules to everyone, whether they are rich or poor. Bail is like a promise to come back to court and face justice, and it's available to everyone who can meet the conditions, not just the wealthy. Just as you wouldn't punish one bull more harshly because they can handle it better, the law doesn't punish someone more just because they have money. The purpose of bail is to ensure that the person returns for their trial, not to judge their guilt or innocence before the trial.

The accused will still face trial (and even a media trial) and be judged for their actions, but it must be done in a way that respects the rules and fairness that we all rely on in society.

Wealth(or the lack of it) should not determine pre-trial freedom; the purpose of bail is to ensure court attendance and not to punish. Applying the same bail conditions universally maintains consistency, respects the rule of law, and ensures that the legal system remains impartial and just.

If you knew a lick of sociology, you’d know that this is not what any decent sociologist would have to say about the issue. Unfortunately, for you, reading comprehension and common sense aren’t strong suits either.

and from your comment, it seems like making an argument isn’t a strong suit of yours either.

A similar issue happened years back

A rich corporate lawyer Jhanavi Gadkar (Talwar Thakkore Associates and later Reliance In House Counsel)

She drunk alcohol, drove her audi super fast and killed many members of an innocent family.

She lives Scott free. She was so rich that even her criminal case never happened.

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/247510-What-happened-to-Janhavi-Gadkar-

My list -

1) Minimum of 5K per month help to Farmers and allied sector labourers.

2) Minimum wage of labourer to be set at 500 RS per day for 8 hours of work. Over time should be like 100rs for 1 hour.

3) No tax or less than 5% tax on essential items such as Rice, Wheat, Dal, Green Vegetables, Potato, Sugar, Jaggery , Oil, Basic Spices etc.

4) Atleast 1 Lakhs of tree plantation in every district of country. Also, 80%+ growing them to full potential.

5) Providing sex education, moral and ethical education classes to middle school and high school students for better character development.

4)

Hi. I joined a rather well-known law firm in March and now I am planning to leave the place due to personal reasons that I dont wish to discuss here, or with any recruiter in future interviews.

What are some acceptable reasons for leaving which I can tell the next recruiter/ interviewer without fear of negative consequences?

This! This is the exact reason why firms don't hire from JGLS. The grade inflation is so much that it's difficult to differentiate between a good and a bad student. People studying 1 day before the exam fail in NLS while in JGLS they get a 7/8. Getting a 6/7 CGPA in NLS will put you in the top 2-3% of the batch.

Multiple factors at play here but start with this: start working with the team and give the practice area a fair shot, without any biases - what may not have worked out for other people may work for you. There is a steep learning curve in capmarks, so brace for impact for the first few months but it does get easier afterwards. If after 8-9 months of working in capmarks, you do find yourself hating it, then start looking out. You have two options here, depending on the organisation you’re currently working with: a) internal shift. This depends on your partner and firm policies but I have witnessed examples of people switching practice areas within the same firm. b) go to another firm. This isnt the easiest thing to do, but people do it and at your level it wouldnt be too difficult to convince the hiring partner to hire you, if your concepts are clear and you do a good job during interviews. You will most likely have to work as an A0 again since most firms discount experience if a candidate is switching practice area, but in the longer run, if you really want to get out of capmarks, this is a fair bargain.

Because of all this:

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/243303-working-in-capital-markets-why-are-people-so-afraid-of-it

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/321333-capital-markets-suicide-anxiety-and-everything-in-between

Now I am not scared for getting into this as taking an exit from this area would be tough and I can't do such work for whole my life.

I am an incoming associate at a T1 Cap marks team. Everyone from people who work in the team to people 10 years senior to me working in other practice areas tell me to leave this and switch to something else. But none of them tells me how do I switch.

How do I switch from Capital Markets to M&A or Disputes? Not a sound financial condition back at home, so money is a consideration for me.

I think you are talking abt Sebi here.Sebi is an apex regulator. Its known for its transparency and honesty. It does have a Settlement Division under its Enforcement Dept , so it's likely a settlement was reached in exchange for fine. Its a routine practice.

I think ur over thinking it. I don't think there's and corruption or bribery involved. Plus it would be highly unlikely that a lawyer fixing cases for Sebi.

Disagree. As a student at NLS, I've witnessed how brutally some well-intentioned but inexperienced professors were treated. They were harassed by students for six or seven trimesters until they finally learned how to deal with students properly. Notably, this professor is one of the brightest individuals I've ever encountered. They are alumni of NLS and were previously employed at a well known foreign firm.

So don’t join academia thinking it will be easy, it won’t.

You won’t be expected to deliver incredible quality from the start and there will be plenty of opportunity to learn on the job. Do the basics right - read, interpret and research properly. Make sure you’re updated as far as the law is concerned. The minimum you should do is to work hard, be diligent, be proactive, show curiosity and hunger, be a good team player and be professional. These qualities will keep you in good stead for a long time.

can you please give reasons for it? and the fees for DU is 1.9l per year and living expenses will be somewhere around 2-2.5l per year, so if we compare it with Jindal it is just few thousands cheaper plus 5year program at DU started last year only. So how can we not consider Jindal over DU?

You will not get a different practice area as a matter of a right. A partner in another practice area may prefer a lateral hire with relevant experience than an internal transfer kid who doesn't know much in that area but costs as much as someone with relevant expertise.

You may be allowed to shift practice areas if you're a high performer and the firm does not want to lose you, it would help if your partner is good and can put in a good word. It'll also help if you are willing to take a year's cut in terms of designation (at an associate level).