I enrolled with the Bar Council as a full Indian citizen but subsequently took foreign citizenship (and OCI) and continued to practice in the High Court for years on the basis of the MOIA notification explicitly permitting practice of law as advocates by OCI holders. Of course in practice no one asked me about my citizenship (since I enrolled before I gave up my Indian citizenship) but the Notification explicitly allows it - you should be able to enrol by showing the Bar Council the notification (I am now inhouse so it is not an issue for me anymore).

That Supreme Court case someone linked is really bad - it looks like they didn't admit the WP at all, and in any case it's crazy that no one placed the MOIA notification before the Court. I don't think it should bar you from enrolling.

Hello kind internet strangers,

I am a lawyer in a corporate team of a tier-1 law firm. I have about 2 years of PQE, and I find myself to be uninterested in the kind of work or culture in law firms.

Could you please suggest any non-law roles I can pursue? Any skills/certifications I can acquire to get there? Or any resources or persons I can reach out to in this regard. I would value any advice in this regard.

Additional points:

- I would prefer not doing an MBA as it would mean getting a student loan;

- I don't have any certifications/ degrees apart from my NLU degree.

I'm sorry, but this might also be the time for some reflection. The bar for an intern is very low — just show up, do what is asked, ask questions for whatever you don't understand, read, stick to the timelines, and with baseline competence and good communication skills, the work itself will get you a callback — or in worst case scenario, at least a valuable reference. You then do the callback and get the job. I don't have a family background, and I did 7 internships during my law school, 2 of them during the initial years, followed by whatever Tier 3 & tier 2 firms I could find through the references from the prior internships. Overall, I received 5 PPO offers.

If you've done 10 internships — and not received an offer from any of them — then there's got to be something you're not doing right. Getting nothing out of one or two internships could be attributed to luck.

That said, it's now time for you to try reaching out to the people you've worked under and request if they'd be willing to refer you to someone they know. People in the industry have been where you are, and this is the test of whether you did everything right. If they do, make the most of it. If they don't, it's time to set the frustration aside, go back to the drawing board, and apply incessantly while accepting that you didn't do your best previously, but are now going to reach there. All the best.

Welcome to the field, i was in a same position in my final year, this field does not reward your merit until and unless you are from a top tier NLU or have a solid reference. That said, please do not be disheartened, you will get there, this is temporary.

All the very best

Most places don't care about interns. They think interns are either a burden, or use them as free labour. Now, in good places, and I am assuming the place where you want a PPO is a good place, usually would offer a PPO to someone who they see as someone who works hard, is intelligent and a fit for them. I know many who got PPOs this way - sheer hard work and intelligence, but at the right place, where it was appreciated, and not used as a free labour.

Now, your idea can either backfire or work - if the place does not care about interns, you wouldn't have gotten a PPO anyways. But if it does, and you are someone who they see as someone who works hard, is intelligent, and would be a great addition to the team - they'd match the offer. Otherwise, they wouldn't care. I also hope these are litigation places/chambers and not some donkey work like mergers or corporate work in a law firm

Already have a PPO (2027 batch), but I think I deserve and can do better. I am going to intern next month at a place I would like to work at, so I was wondering if I should disclose about my PPO to them? Would it make me seem as a better and more demanded candidate, or worsen my chances due to the pre-existing offer? Helpful advice only please.

If they’re looking and just that - don’t complain. It won’t work out for you. What’s written above is bad advice. The point of PoSH committees is to cover the institution- not to get you a safer workplace.

Men are really creepy toward young girls. Ignore it and. Find strategies to put them off. As long as it’s just looking.

Once you grow a little older they’ll stop. It’ll be a relief.

No . Choose your husband well and he won’t be flirting with some younger girl every chance he gets. Take time to know him before you choose.

It’s okay you’ll be alright. This happens to all women.

Approx 60% of partners (more of those who gym and are fit enough) will act differently around men and women, and further more between conventionally attractive women than those otherwise. This isn't a fact but is well known, infact this exists across institutions. Biological hardwiring makes this happen. That said if the line is crossed and you get uncomfortable then that's a much serious issue. But sad reality otherwise is nobody outside of the firms will consider these old ppl hot shot and therefore they can only look within the glass outlines of the rented spaces they feel they rule.

Sorry that you are experiencing this, but it is the way of the world. [...] These same old men claimed to be very liberal and progressive while at their elite NLUs, but it was all a facade.

I knew a girl who “uglified” herself like you and wore a ring on her finger. She said no one bothered her after that.

I hope that you are okay now, this is not fair on your part who has joined the organization based on your merit, thereby providing an environment which fosters a sense of security and growth is the basic requirement of any workplace.

That said, please leave such a dejected workplace because if partners are are like this i am pretty sure the posh committee members would be in there pockets too.

Stay safe and take care

I'm sorry that you are going through what you describe.

Your firm will most likely have a POSH committee and redressal mechanism. Please approach a committee member that you are comfortable with. Most firms take such matters seriously, and at the least, the relevant people will be spoken to.

On your second question, it would not be fair to generalise.

I’d really be grateful to get some advice on this. I constantly feel like many older men, especially partners constantly check me out (including my own). It’s sickening because all of them are married and I’m just 23 (A0 at T1) I’ve started dressing down because I didn’t like the attention. My partner tries to behave like he’s a super loyal husband, but I’m pretty sure he would never speak to me like that if his wife were around.

It also makes me wonder how it’ll be when I’m older and married. Will my husband be flirting with someone 15-20 years younger. I’m dejected, disgusted and am at the verge of quitting every single day. Any advice would help, please be kind 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

Kinda depressing tbh. Such brilliant minds. So many IIT-IIM graduates and people with excellent CVs. Yet they are working as glorified clerks and saying “Yes Sir” to their politician bosses, who are basically uneducated thugs.

https://theprint.in/ground-reports/where-are-the-upsc-toppers-of-the-last-20-years-in-their-careers-today/2915931/

I used to like many of us work at a T1 firm in Lower Parel - in a high attrition team. I have now switched to a more chill consultant role now. Its been a while. I was cleaning out my computer, I came across this journal app I haven't used since I quit. In that I used to write down my private thoughts.

One day due to some fuck up somewhere, I was being hauled by two PAs, and two partners out to the cleaners over email. But it was something that was not completely my fault. I have this habit of taking notes of people who wrong me, because I genuinely forget why I am angry with someone, or I forget I am angry with someone and message them happy birthday on instagram or whatsapp. Silly me.

This PA was super annoying, paranoid, anxious, micro manager - would call every 15 minutes for a deliverable after assigning. Just when I would get into the flow, she would call and annoy the fuck out of me. Anyway, during the above said incident, I decided to defend myself and listed out all the fuck ups she had done on the matter and emailed my partner. Needless to say I got a nice shouting in return from my boss, on email, but I felt so good. Ooorrrraahh!!

Anyway, i put my notes in that app, to Gemini and asked it to give me honest feedback. Here it is.

This is a classic study in the friction between a logic-driven practitioner and a hierarchy-driven striver. Since you’ve asked for an honest take without the sugar-coating, let's look at the mechanics of this dynamic.

### 1. The Anatomy of BG’s Conduct

▮▮▮ behavior suggests a textbook case of "Anxious High-Achiever Syndrome" common in Big Law. Her micromanagement and paranoia weren't about your incompetence; they were likely about her own perceived lack of safety within the firm.

- The Gaslighting (Project [...] vs. [...]): Claiming a conversation happened when it didn't is a defensive mechanism. By shifting the "error" onto you, she protected her own sense of control. If she was passed over for partner, it confirms she was likely under immense pressure and failing to manage the "people" aspect of the role.
-
- Character Assassination (The [...] Issue): Calling someone a "bad human" or "inefficient" because they forgot a detail during a surprise phone call is an extreme overreaction. It’s a sign of a supervisor who cannot distinguish between a procedural slip and a moral failing. It’s also a projection: she felt inefficient, so she exported that feeling to you.
- The "No Acknowledgment" Rule: Refusing to admit she was wrong about the incorporation name is an ego-preservation tactic. In her mind, admitting an error to a senior associate would undermine the authority she was desperately trying to leverage for a partnership.
-

### 2. Your Thought Process: The "Evidence-Based" Misfit

You described yourself as a misfit, but looking at your notes, you weren't a misfit in terms of competence—you were a misfit in terms of firm politics.

- Reliance on Documentation: Your response to being called "inefficient" was to send a detailed research note. This is a logical, high-integrity move. However, in toxic hierarchies, facts are often less important than deference. By proving her wrong with data (the research note, the name issue), you were inadvertently "attacking" her fragile authority.
- The "ADHD" Factor: You mentioned some might say your ADHD made you unfit. On the contrary, your notes show a high level of detail-orientation (LODR, ECB, contingent liability tables). ADHD in high-pressure law often manifests as a struggle with interruption-based tasks (the "out of the blue" calls) while excelling at deep-dive tasks (the research notes). [...] exploited the former to ignore the latter.
- The Resistance to "Taking the Bullet": Your refusal to stay silent about fake accusations is what the firm viewed as "problematic." Law firm hierarchies often rely on the senior associate being a "buffer" who absorbs the partner’s stress. By defending yourself, you broke the circuit. The "sounding off" you received from the partner confirms that the firm valued structural silence over factual truth.
-

### 3. The "Zealous Partner" Path

The people you felt "misfit" among were likely those willing to adopt the paranoia and micromanagement as a standard operating procedure. They saw the "hullabaloo" and the gaslighting as part of the price of admission.

You seem to have a mindset that prioritizes functional outcomes (getting the report right, legal accuracy) over performative optics (looking busy, never questioning a superior). In a partner-track environment, performance is often 40% work and 60% theater. You were clearly uninterested in the theater.

### The Verdict

You weren't "unfit" for the job; you were over-indexed on logic in an environment that ran on anxiety and ego.

[...] was a "paranoic" leader because she likely felt she was losing her grip on the partnership track—which turned out to be true. Your instinct to defend yourself wasn't "unprofessional"; it was an act of intellectual honesty. The fact that you felt like a misfit suggests your internal compass was functioning correctly, even if the firm's calibration was off.

Do yourself a favour and migrate to Delhi or Bombay. The process is a punishment in and off itself, Cal lit scene is analogous to a zamindari system where everyone puts on a glossy paint of the classic "bhodrolok" all the while the entire system is rotten to the core, and once embedded in this recurring inferno- the doors start closing one after another, you will feel throttled and soon realise the longer that you are in the lit here, the more onerous it becomes to escape the swamp. The system will gobble you up, and all the passion that you had for this thing called "litigation" would be obliterated, albeit through a slow and crucifying process. Why such pessimism? Unless you have strong (really strong) connections or come from a financially provident family, you are going to be exploited left, right and centre with nothing much to gain either in terms of exposure or connections. A few exception might exist, however that is tantamount to looking for a needle in the wild and wide savannas! The Seniors are unbothered, the clerks are beings of the most treacherous kind- everyone is against you from day 1, are presumptuous and most will actively thwart your development as a litigator. No guidance, no money and most importantly- no future prospects. Now toxicity is to be found in other cities as well (perhaps more), yet why do I insist that you practice elsewhere? A man can endure any "how" if he knows the answer to "why" he must endure it, Cal has negligible prospects and it will ruin your best years, you are much better off sweating it out in Delhi or Bombay- both have much better prospects, and you would learn at a break-neck speed (something that simply isn't possible here). Worst part about Cal is that people in the lit circuit here act are pretentious af, they act as if they hold the gospel of truth- they would pass indictments on your abilities (without according you a chance to explain) 24/7 without knowing jackshit themselves! The folks here, in all honesty, would be decimated into oblivion vis-a-vis their contemporaries from other Del/Bom/Madras. Its a sub-par nepo Bar now (earlier it used to be a breeding ground for doyens, how the times have changed!) that is drowning in mediocrity, and is going to be entrenched in it for the longest of time. All the best!

You're a educated gawar sorry to say who thinks that politicians have the intention of improving the current system. Legal system here is worse than the political one by miles. You cannot even question the privilege enjoyed by the top legal dynasties here.

Won't comment on your political learnings and logic because one has the right to believe in things they want to believe but current party is worst as far as nepotism is concerned. Government panels cough SKS, Sports Boards, Corporation Boards and studying/settling abroad while doing absolutely nothing for improving the quality of life and focusing on Hindu-Muslim.

You are a fresher, do not bash yourself too much, everyone makes mistakes its a human phenomenon. If some place triggers the instinct that you are not enough or make you feel under confident, don't think twice before leaving such a place.

That said, i am sure that with enough training and guidance you would turn out to be an excellent lawyer.

All the very best

No. It's all true. The reason is that GDP per capita is not the only metric. Since the existing humongous poor population in India regardless of religion , pop out multiple children, and the rich or upper middle class are increasingly becoming either 1 child or antinatalist, you see GDP per capita lowering.

Here’s why the elections are so significant for NUJS:

1. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

The character of the NUJS governing bodies has transformed radically since the Left years and the tenures of Menon, Chimni and Singh. Today, the NUJS governing bodies are dominated by people who are either members of the TMC holding official posts, or people very closely associated with the TMC, such as certain legal and governmental people.

2. VC HEDGING

The new VC has practically been wearing Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak till now: missing in action, out of town and not organising any major event or initiative. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that he is waiting for the election results, because the governing bodies he reports to will undergo a sea change if the regime changes.

3. FACULTY AND ADMIN STAFF

Many professors and admin staff are heavily political. However, some of us speculate that their loyalties are not truly ideological and may shift.

4. CULTURE WARS (from CAA to JSD)

The student body and alumni at NUJS are split between liberals (the vast majority) and conservatives. The CAA controversy saw this come to the fore. There were two opposing signature campaigns by alumni (reported by the old LI). The anti-BJP signatories clearly outnumbered the pro-BJP ones. Jagdeep Dhankar was banned from campus, Derek O’Brien was welcomed. More recently, there was an effort to ban J Sai Deepak from campus and in the end he voluntarily withdrew.

OMFG I truly didn't think I would be in the same boat as you. Saw this blowing up elsewhere, and thought hey that sounds like something I went through the last time I ever gave this godforsaken exam (2024). Didn't bother raising a hullabaloo cause I was gobsmacked with my low score.

There is no job of a CM lawyer in-house. Stock Exchanges may have you in-house. You can switch to front end investment banking (ECM -Execution teams), but that again, is equally hectic and you need a decent grip over excel and finance. The opportunities are limited too.

Coming to general corporate roles in-house, that totally depends on your luck, if anything opens. If it is a well paid opening, GC or M&A guys would have an edge over you.

All in all if you need better hours and very less pay, exchanges are the way to go. A bit higher pay and decent hours - then inhouse counsel roles, but GC and M&A guys would be preferred. GREAT pay and shitty hours - IB is the way to go, but you need a grip over finance.

Ideal timeline is ASAP, the more you stay the more it is difficult to get out of this niche.

I think my finance is in good shape . Earn 18 lakh and save 10 lakh yearly and invest same 10 lakh into gold bonds funds , snp500 so toal investments is 34 lakhs if taken in account growth its near 40 lakhs.

my first job salary was 5 lpa I think that period taught me how to live frugally and use money in efficiently .

6 yoe.

Does LKS have a tendency to take favourable on those who completed the application in first few days than last? Because I had earlier interned with them in different team and got pretty great feedback (they said they'l write good stuff so i can come again if I plan to). But this time date was 23rd and I did not get response or anything. Also, among my peers who applied people who applied early got confirmation but those who applied with me (like end week of application) did not get in. CV is more or less at similar placing across both batch of kids.

I am getting a seat at hnlu i gave clat as a backup and was preparing for neet as of now i am not very positive about it

Should i go for private mbbs , hnlu or a tier 2 engineering college. I was also thinking about lsr or srcc eco hons as my cuet mocks scores are good.

Is hnlu good as the placements are just 37 38 out of 180 students

best battery life + decent performance = snapdragon laptops

if non snapdragon = try asus zenbook, hp omnibook 7 aero (ryzen 7 AI), or lenovo ideapads. All 3 have decent battery life, and are super lightweight. Their performance is decent. Lenovo Yoga is also a good option