We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
For now, because honesty about comp is important, some responses:
- Fixed Pay: We have done a benchmarking for Tier 1 scales based on information from a third-party executive search firm. This firm was chosen by the consensus of our fee earners (excluding me). It has shared ballparks for every year of PQE. We calculate our fixed as the average of this ballpark as reduced by 20%.
- Variable Pay: The variable is intended to bring the team up to Tier 1 scales. Therefore, variable benchmarks are equal to Tier 1 benchmarks + the 20% discount to fixed, subject to individual and team performance. This is a WIP and we are still young, but last year, the best performers made more than their Tier 1 colleagues.
- A0s: We do not benchmark for A0s, for two reasons: a) We are a specialist boutique and looking for people who are a good fit for the work we do. A0s usually need some time before they are able to add value; b) There is a signaling value to A0 compensation which we don't want to participate in. If compensation is the primary driving factor (to an extent that we are discussing Which Tier 1 to peg pay to, amongst a group of highly paying Tier 1s), then it's a culture mismatch i.e. we are not the right firm for you. For the same reasons, we will not put up numbers on a public platform, but we are happy to publicly share the method of calculation. This is our commitment to transparency, but is also intended to give you a sense of whether you're likely to be financially comfortable with us, because money is important. If you need more details, please reach out to us and we'd love to have a longer chat once we are able to assess each other.
Thanks for all the interest!
If fee an issue, go to DU
If BTech, go to IIT Kharagpur
If get selected prefer NLSIU over all
What problem did you solve? That is your selling point and calling card as a lawyer. In litigation or corporate law. Not a few letters adorned next to your linkedin profile or CV.
Unfortunately some people are treating these letters as a salesman would, leveraging it for credibility. That doesn't go so far as you people tend to think.
Focus on problems of the law. Work on it long enough. You start building credibility. Otherwise you're just another lawyer, like any other lawyer from a college you openly disrespect.
The idea that someone is unfit to be a judge because they didn’t attend an NLU, or never accessed Lexis/HeinOnline, is not only intellectually narrow but classist in the extreme. By that logic, the overwhelming majority of India’s legal professionals and even some of its most brilliant judges would be deemed unworthy. That’s not just elitist… it’s detached from the lived realities of legal education in India.
Law is not about how many Western academic articles you can cite or how many international moot courts you’ve attended. It’s about applying legal reasoning, understanding human context, interpreting the law justly, guess what, sometimes grinding through bare acts because that’s what people’s lives and liberties hinge on.
The CJI didn’t “diss” NLUs. he simply pointed out a truth that legal talent exists beyond elite bubbles. It’s your job as NLU students or alumni to push academic excellence without sneering at those who came up through different routes. Yes, NLUs have brought in much-needed rigor. But no, they’re not the only metric of legal ability. And acting like they are just reinforces the exact kind of ivory-tower arrogance that makes legal education so alienating for the rest of the country.
10 & 3 are probably the only regular faces.
I am very familiar with what is happening at Bombay rn. Read the comment again, and read between the lines. One gentleman (not naming him on purpose) was made to wait till he legit reached the "I've had enough" point and withdrew his consent. Read between the lines.
Shwetasree Majumder, NLSIU: ❌
Saurabh Kirpal, Cambridge:❌
CJI’s nephew, Amravati: ✅
#VishwaGuru
need to know asap, very relevant
How is that 10%, more like 1.5% lol
Horrible
Asking for a friend who has been offered a role in her team.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/cu-probe-panel-submits-law-college-rape-report/amp_articleshow/122982642.cms
What next? Abhishek Banerjee as Chancellor?
NUJS is turning into Hazra Law Colllege and the SJA is 200% complicit.
Source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DN3COcsVEpp/?igsh=N3o3anZ1MjdlcjY5
In any case, if you feel otherwise, I would recommend that you first understand the quantum which is at stake. If it is in lakhs/crores, engage a senior advocate. Their fees are exorbitant, but they are the most effective at securing relief for their client. Your current advocate can help you with that. If the quantum isn't that much, just look for similar cases on Indian Kanoon - be specific to the forum - and you will find those lawyers who have been able to secure relief in cases similar to yours. You can always approach them. All the best!
We all know how the business of such testimonials works. ▮▮▮,
To understand the true worth of a litigating lawyer is to gauge how their fellow litigators speak of them. ▮▮▮. In any case, being engaged by the Department to argue for them speaks highly of the volume of the client-side work of this team.
A friend of mine (who is a non-law student) is considering joining the MBA program at MNLU Mumbai (2-year course). Since doing an MBA at an NLU is a bit unusual, we are trying to gather as much information as possible. I would really appreciate it if any MNLU Mumbai students, alumni, or anyone who knows someone in the MBA program could help by answering any of the following questions (reply to whichever you have knowledge about):
1. How is the overall faculty for the BBA/MBA program?
2. Is it advisable to pursue an MBA from MNLU Mumbai, or should one consider other institutes instead?
3. For students in the BBA LLB program at MNLU Mumbai – how are your BBA professors?
4. Do the BBA faculty members (especially in Economics, Business Studies, and Financial Accounting) teach well and have good subject knowledge?
5. How many batches have graduated from the MBA program so far?
6. Does anyone personally know a student from the MBA program, and if yes, are they satisfied with the course and teaching?
7. Any other suggestions or advice for a non-law student planning to pursue an MBA from an NLU?
Your inputs will be extremely valuable, and any information you can share will be really helpful. Thank you in advance! 🙏
People working in Tier 1/Tier 2 Firms in WCC teams, what exactly does the work entail? Is it a sub-team within the Disputes broader contour and how does it differ from general Litigation work?